提交 515d82ff 编写于 作者: J Jeff Layton 提交者: Steve French

cifs: add new "Unspecified" securityEnum value

Add a new securityEnum value to cover the case where a sec= option
was not explicitly set.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
上级 9193400b
......@@ -101,11 +101,11 @@ enum statusEnum {
};
enum securityEnum {
LANMAN = 0, /* Legacy LANMAN auth */
Unspecified = 0, /* not specified */
LANMAN, /* Legacy LANMAN auth */
NTLM, /* Legacy NTLM012 auth with NTLM hash */
NTLMv2, /* Legacy NTLM auth with NTLMv2 hash */
RawNTLMSSP, /* NTLMSSP without SPNEGO, NTLMv2 hash */
/* NTLMSSP, */ /* can use rawNTLMSSP instead of NTLMSSP via SPNEGO */
Kerberos, /* Kerberos via SPNEGO */
};
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册