提交 463207aa 编写于 作者: A Alex Elder 提交者: Sage Weil

libceph: use cursor for bio reads

Replace the use of the information in con->in_msg_pos for incoming
bio data.  The old in_msg_pos and the new cursor mechanism do
basically the same thing, just slightly differently.

The main functional difference is that in_msg_pos keeps track of the
length of the complete bio list, and assumed it was fully consumed
when that many bytes had been transferred.  The cursor does not assume
a length, it simply consumes all bytes in the bio list.  Because the
only user of bio data is the rbd client, and because the length of a
bio list provided by rbd client always matches the number of bytes
in the list, both ways of tracking length are equivalent.

In addition, for in_msg_pos the initial bio vector is selected as
the initial value of the bio->bi_idx, while the cursor assumes this
is zero.  Again, the rbd client always passes 0 as the initial index
so the effect is the same.

Other than that, they basically match:
    in_msg_pos      cursor
    ----------      ------
    bio_iter        bio
    bio_seg         vec_index
    page_pos        page_offset

The in_msg_pos field is initialized by a call to init_bio_iter().
The bio cursor is initialized by ceph_msg_data_cursor_init().
Both now happen in the same spot, in prepare_message_data().

The in_msg_pos field is advanced by a call to in_msg_pos_next(),
which updates page_pos and calls iter_bio_next() to move to the next
bio vector, or to the next bio in the list.  The cursor is advanced
by ceph_msg_data_advance().  That isn't currently happening so
add a call to that in in_msg_pos_next().

Finally, the next piece of data to use for a read is determined
by a bunch of lines in read_partial_message_bio().  Those can be
replaced by an equivalent ceph_msg_data_bio_next() call.

This partially resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4428Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
上级 25aff7c5
......@@ -1468,6 +1468,10 @@ static void in_msg_pos_next(struct ceph_connection *con, size_t len,
msg_pos->data_pos += received;
msg_pos->page_pos += received;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
if (ceph_msg_has_bio(msg))
(void) ceph_msg_data_advance(&msg->b, received);
#endif /* CONFIG_BLOCK */
if (received < len)
return;
......@@ -2255,23 +2259,14 @@ static int read_partial_message_bio(struct ceph_connection *con,
unsigned int data_len, bool do_datacrc)
{
struct ceph_msg *msg = con->in_msg;
struct ceph_msg_pos *msg_pos = &con->in_msg_pos;
struct bio_vec *bv;
struct page *page;
size_t page_offset;
size_t length;
unsigned int left;
int ret;
BUG_ON(!msg);
BUG_ON(!msg->b.bio_iter);
bv = bio_iovec_idx(msg->b.bio_iter, msg->b.bio_seg);
page = bv->bv_page;
page_offset = bv->bv_offset + msg_pos->page_pos;
BUG_ON(msg_pos->data_pos >= data_len);
left = data_len - msg_pos->data_pos;
BUG_ON(msg_pos->page_pos >= bv->bv_len);
length = min_t(unsigned int, bv->bv_len - msg_pos->page_pos, left);
page = ceph_msg_data_next(&msg->b, &page_offset, &length, NULL);
ret = ceph_tcp_recvpage(con->sock, page, page_offset, length);
if (ret <= 0)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册