提交 3de5e884 编写于 作者: L Lai Jiangshan 提交者: Tejun Heo

workqueue: clear POOL_DISASSOCIATED in rebind_workers()

a9ab775b ("workqueue: directly restore CPU affinity of workers
from CPU_ONLINE") moved pool locking into rebind_workers() but left
"pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED" in workqueue_cpu_up_callback().

There is nothing necessarily wrong with it, but there is no benefit
either.  Let's move it into rebind_workers() and achieve the following
benefits:

  1) better readability, POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared in rebind_workers()
     as expected.

  2) we can guarantee that, when POOL_DISASSOCIATED is clear, the
     running workers of the pool are on the local CPU (pool->cpu).

tj: Minor description update.
Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
上级 92b69f50
......@@ -4535,6 +4535,7 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
unsigned int worker_flags = worker->flags;
......@@ -4637,10 +4638,6 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
rebind_workers(pool);
} else if (pool->cpu < 0) {
restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册