提交 390be282 编写于 作者: F Felix Kuehling 提交者: Alex Deucher

drm/amdgpu: Don't call interval_tree_remove in amdgpu_mn_destroy

rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe can skip over some entries if
the tree is rebalanced in interval_tree_remove. interval_tree_remove
is also redundant when the tree is just about to be freed.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
上级 b8ea3783
......@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ static void amdgpu_mn_destroy(struct work_struct *work)
hash_del(&rmn->node);
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(node, next_node, &rmn->objects,
it.rb) {
interval_tree_remove(&node->it, &rmn->objects);
list_for_each_entry_safe(bo, next_bo, &node->bos, mn_list) {
bo->mn = NULL;
list_del_init(&bo->mn_list);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册