提交 3842a083 编写于 作者: P Paul E. McKenney

rcu: Document same-context read-side constraints

The intent is that a given RCU read-side critical section be confined
to a single context.  For example, it is illegal to invoke rcu_read_lock()
in an exception handler and then invoke rcu_read_unlock() from the
context of the task that received the exception.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
上级 f0e7c19d
...@@ -265,6 +265,11 @@ extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void); ...@@ -265,6 +265,11 @@ extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
* *
* Checks debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot * Checks debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot
* and while lockdep is disabled. * and while lockdep is disabled.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock() and the matching rcu_read_unlock() must
* occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
* rcu_read_unlock() in process context if the matching rcu_read_lock()
* was invoked from within an irq handler.
*/ */
static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void) static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
{ {
...@@ -689,6 +694,11 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void) ...@@ -689,6 +694,11 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
* critical sections in interrupt context can use just rcu_read_lock(), * critical sections in interrupt context can use just rcu_read_lock(),
* though this should at least be commented to avoid confusing people * though this should at least be commented to avoid confusing people
* reading the code. * reading the code.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock_bh() and the matching rcu_read_unlock_bh()
* must occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
* rcu_read_unlock_bh() from one task if the matching rcu_read_lock_bh()
* was invoked from some other task.
*/ */
static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void) static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
{ {
...@@ -716,6 +726,11 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void) ...@@ -716,6 +726,11 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
* are being done using call_rcu_sched() or synchronize_rcu_sched(). * are being done using call_rcu_sched() or synchronize_rcu_sched().
* Read-side critical sections can also be introduced by anything that * Read-side critical sections can also be introduced by anything that
* disables preemption, including local_irq_disable() and friends. * disables preemption, including local_irq_disable() and friends.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock_sched() and the matching rcu_read_unlock_sched()
* must occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
* rcu_read_unlock_sched() from process context if the matching
* rcu_read_lock_sched() was invoked from an NMI handler.
*/ */
static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void) static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void)
{ {
......
...@@ -158,6 +158,11 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(struct srcu_struct *sp) ...@@ -158,6 +158,11 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(struct srcu_struct *sp)
* one way to indirectly wait on an SRCU grace period is to acquire * one way to indirectly wait on an SRCU grace period is to acquire
* a mutex that is held elsewhere while calling synchronize_srcu() or * a mutex that is held elsewhere while calling synchronize_srcu() or
* synchronize_srcu_expedited(). * synchronize_srcu_expedited().
*
* Note that srcu_read_lock() and the matching srcu_read_unlock() must
* occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
* srcu_read_unlock() in an irq handler if the matching srcu_read_lock()
* was invoked in process context.
*/ */
static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *sp) __acquires(sp) static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *sp) __acquires(sp)
{ {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册