提交 36620032 编写于 作者: C Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Update ring position from request on retiring

When wedged, we do not update the ring->tail as we submit the requests
causing us to leak the ring->space upon cleaning up the wedged driver.
We can just use the value stored in rq->tail, and keep the submission
backend details away from set-wedge.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
上级 2d4ecace
...@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static void advance_ring(struct i915_request *request) ...@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static void advance_ring(struct i915_request *request)
* is just about to be. Either works, if we miss the last two * is just about to be. Either works, if we miss the last two
* noops - they are safe to be replayed on a reset. * noops - they are safe to be replayed on a reset.
*/ */
tail = READ_ONCE(request->ring->tail); tail = READ_ONCE(request->tail);
} else { } else {
tail = request->postfix; tail = request->postfix;
} }
......
...@@ -1593,6 +1593,7 @@ static noinline int wait_for_space(struct intel_ring *ring, unsigned int bytes) ...@@ -1593,6 +1593,7 @@ static noinline int wait_for_space(struct intel_ring *ring, unsigned int bytes)
if (intel_ring_update_space(ring) >= bytes) if (intel_ring_update_space(ring) >= bytes)
return 0; return 0;
GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&ring->request_list));
list_for_each_entry(target, &ring->request_list, ring_link) { list_for_each_entry(target, &ring->request_list, ring_link) {
/* Would completion of this request free enough space? */ /* Would completion of this request free enough space? */
if (bytes <= __intel_ring_space(target->postfix, if (bytes <= __intel_ring_space(target->postfix,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册