提交 34d7c2b3 编写于 作者: P Paul E. McKenney 提交者: Ingo Molnar

rcu: remove list_for_each_rcu()

All of the in-tree uses of list_for_each_rcu() have been converted to
list_for_each_entry_rcu(), so list_for_each_rcu() can now be removed.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 ff9cf2ce
......@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
number of updates per grace period.
9. All RCU list-traversal primitives, which include
rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_rcu(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(),
rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(),
list_for_each_continue_rcu(), and list_for_each_safe_rcu(),
must be either within an RCU read-side critical section or
must be protected by appropriate update-side locks. RCU
......
......@@ -786,8 +786,6 @@ RCU pointer/list traversal:
list_for_each_entry_rcu
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu
list_for_each_rcu (to be deprecated in favor of
list_for_each_entry_rcu)
list_for_each_continue_rcu (to be deprecated in favor of new
list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu)
......
......@@ -198,20 +198,6 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
at->prev = last;
}
/**
* list_for_each_rcu - iterate over an rcu-protected list
* @pos: the &struct list_head to use as a loop cursor.
* @head: the head for your list.
*
* This list-traversal primitive may safely run concurrently with
* the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu()
* as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock().
*/
#define list_for_each_rcu(pos, head) \
for (pos = rcu_dereference((head)->next); \
prefetch(pos->next), pos != (head); \
pos = rcu_dereference(pos->next))
#define __list_for_each_rcu(pos, head) \
for (pos = rcu_dereference((head)->next); \
pos != (head); \
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册