提交 33766368 编写于 作者: J Jouni Malinen 提交者: Johannes Berg

mac80211: Fix FC masking in BIP AAD generation

The bits used in the mask were off-by-one and ended up masking PwrMgt,
MoreData, Protected fields instead of Retry, PwrMgt, MoreData. Fix this
and to mask the correct fields. While doing so, convert the code to mask
the full FC using IEEE80211_FCTL_* defines similarly to how CCMP AAD is
built.

Since BIP is used only with broadcast/multicast management frames, the
Retry field is always 0 in these frames. The Protected field is also
zero to maintain backwards compatibility. As such, the incorrect mask
here does not really cause any problems for valid frames. In theory, an
invalid BIP frame with Retry or Protected field set to 1 could be
rejected because of BIP validation. However, no such frame should show
up with standard compliant implementations, so this does not cause
problems in normal BIP use.
Signed-off-by: NJouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
上级 7ce8c7a3
......@@ -545,14 +545,19 @@ ieee80211_crypto_ccmp_decrypt(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
static void bip_aad(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 *aad)
{
__le16 mask_fc;
struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *) skb->data;
/* BIP AAD: FC(masked) || A1 || A2 || A3 */
/* FC type/subtype */
aad[0] = skb->data[0];
/* Mask FC Retry, PwrMgt, MoreData flags to zero */
aad[1] = skb->data[1] & ~(BIT(4) | BIT(5) | BIT(6));
mask_fc = hdr->frame_control;
mask_fc &= ~cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FCTL_RETRY | IEEE80211_FCTL_PM |
IEEE80211_FCTL_MOREDATA);
put_unaligned(mask_fc, (__le16 *) &aad[0]);
/* A1 || A2 || A3 */
memcpy(aad + 2, skb->data + 4, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
memcpy(aad + 2, &hdr->addr1, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册