提交 2813d682 编写于 作者: C Christoph Hellwig 提交者: Ben Myers

xfs: remove the i_new_size field in struct xfs_inode

Now that we use the VFS i_size field throughout XFS there is no need for the
i_new_size field any more given that the VFS i_size field gets updated
in ->write_end before unlocking the page, and thus is always uptodate when
writeback could see a page.  Removing i_new_size also has the advantage that
we will never have to trim back di_size during a failed buffered write,
given that it never gets updated past i_size.

Note that currently the generic direct I/O code only updates i_size after
calling our end_io handler, which requires a small workaround to make
sure di_size actually makes it to disk.  I hope to fix this properly in
the generic code.

A downside is that we lose the support for parallel non-overlapping O_DIRECT
appending writes that recently was added.  I don't think keeping the complex
and fragile i_new_size infrastructure for this is a good tradeoff - if we
really care about parallel appending writers we should investigate turning
the iolock into a range lock, which would also allow for parallel
non-overlapping buffered writers.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
上级 ce7ae151
......@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ xfs_ioend_new_eof(
xfs_fsize_t bsize;
bsize = ioend->io_offset + ioend->io_size;
isize = MAX(i_size_read(VFS_I(ip)), ip->i_new_size);
isize = MIN(isize, bsize);
isize = MIN(i_size_read(VFS_I(ip)), bsize);
return isize > ip->i_d.di_size ? isize : 0;
}
......@@ -126,11 +125,7 @@ static inline bool xfs_ioend_is_append(struct xfs_ioend *ioend)
}
/*
* Update on-disk file size now that data has been written to disk. The
* current in-memory file size is i_size. If a write is beyond eof i_new_size
* will be the intended file size until i_size is updated. If this write does
* not extend all the way to the valid file size then restrict this update to
* the end of the write.
* Update on-disk file size now that data has been written to disk.
*
* This function does not block as blocking on the inode lock in IO completion
* can lead to IO completion order dependency deadlocks.. If it can't get the
......@@ -1278,6 +1273,15 @@ xfs_end_io_direct_write(
{
struct xfs_ioend *ioend = iocb->private;
/*
* While the generic direct I/O code updates the inode size, it does
* so only after the end_io handler is called, which means our
* end_io handler thinks the on-disk size is outside the in-core
* size. To prevent this just update it a little bit earlier here.
*/
if (offset + size > i_size_read(ioend->io_inode))
i_size_write(ioend->io_inode, offset + size);
/*
* blockdev_direct_IO can return an error even after the I/O
* completion handler was called. Thus we need to protect
......@@ -1340,12 +1344,11 @@ xfs_vm_write_failed(
if (to > inode->i_size) {
/*
* punch out the delalloc blocks we have already allocated. We
* don't call xfs_setattr() to do this as we may be in the
* middle of a multi-iovec write and so the vfs inode->i_size
* will not match the xfs ip->i_size and so it will zero too
* much. Hence we jus truncate the page cache to zero what is
* necessary and punch the delalloc blocks directly.
* Punch out the delalloc blocks we have already allocated.
*
* Don't bother with xfs_setattr given that nothing can have
* made it to disk yet as the page is still locked at this
* point.
*/
struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
xfs_fileoff_t start_fsb;
......
......@@ -412,27 +412,6 @@ xfs_file_splice_read(
return ret;
}
/*
* If this was a direct or synchronous I/O that failed (such as ENOSPC) then
* part of the I/O may have been written to disk before the error occurred. In
* this case the on-disk file size may have been adjusted beyond the in-memory
* file size and now needs to be truncated back.
*/
STATIC void
xfs_aio_write_newsize_update(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
xfs_fsize_t new_size)
{
if (new_size == ip->i_new_size) {
xfs_rw_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
if (new_size == ip->i_new_size)
ip->i_new_size = 0;
if (ip->i_d.di_size > i_size_read(VFS_I(ip)))
ip->i_d.di_size = i_size_read(VFS_I(ip));
xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
}
}
/*
* xfs_file_splice_write() does not use xfs_rw_ilock() because
* generic_file_splice_write() takes the i_mutex itself. This, in theory,
......@@ -451,7 +430,6 @@ xfs_file_splice_write(
{
struct inode *inode = outfilp->f_mapping->host;
struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
xfs_fsize_t new_size;
int ioflags = 0;
ssize_t ret;
......@@ -465,20 +443,12 @@ xfs_file_splice_write(
xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
new_size = *ppos + count;
xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
if (new_size > i_size_read(inode))
ip->i_new_size = new_size;
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
trace_xfs_file_splice_write(ip, count, *ppos, ioflags);
ret = generic_file_splice_write(pipe, outfilp, ppos, count, flags);
if (ret > 0)
XFS_STATS_ADD(xs_write_bytes, ret);
xfs_aio_write_newsize_update(ip, new_size);
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
return ret;
}
......@@ -673,16 +643,13 @@ xfs_file_aio_write_checks(
struct file *file,
loff_t *pos,
size_t *count,
xfs_fsize_t *new_sizep,
int *iolock)
{
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
xfs_fsize_t new_size;
int error = 0;
xfs_rw_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
*new_sizep = 0;
restart:
error = generic_write_checks(file, pos, count, S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode));
if (error) {
......@@ -697,15 +664,13 @@ xfs_file_aio_write_checks(
/*
* If the offset is beyond the size of the file, we need to zero any
* blocks that fall between the existing EOF and the start of this
* write. There is no need to issue zeroing if another in-flght IO ends
* at or before this one If zeronig is needed and we are currently
* holding the iolock shared, we need to update it to exclusive which
* involves dropping all locks and relocking to maintain correct locking
* order. If we do this, restart the function to ensure all checks and
* values are still valid.
* write. If zeroing is needed and we are currently holding the
* iolock shared, we need to update it to exclusive which involves
* dropping all locks and relocking to maintain correct locking order.
* If we do this, restart the function to ensure all checks and values
* are still valid.
*/
if ((ip->i_new_size && *pos > ip->i_new_size) ||
(!ip->i_new_size && *pos > i_size_read(inode))) {
if (*pos > i_size_read(inode)) {
if (*iolock == XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED) {
xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | *iolock);
*iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
......@@ -714,19 +679,6 @@ xfs_file_aio_write_checks(
}
error = -xfs_zero_eof(ip, *pos, i_size_read(inode));
}
/*
* If this IO extends beyond EOF, we may need to update ip->i_new_size.
* We have already zeroed space beyond EOF (if necessary). Only update
* ip->i_new_size if this IO ends beyond any other in-flight writes.
*/
new_size = *pos + *count;
if (new_size > i_size_read(inode)) {
if (new_size > ip->i_new_size)
ip->i_new_size = new_size;
*new_sizep = new_size;
}
xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
if (error)
return error;
......@@ -772,7 +724,6 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write(
unsigned long nr_segs,
loff_t pos,
size_t ocount,
xfs_fsize_t *new_size,
int *iolock)
{
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
......@@ -817,7 +768,7 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write(
xfs_rw_ilock(ip, *iolock);
}
ret = xfs_file_aio_write_checks(file, &pos, &count, new_size, iolock);
ret = xfs_file_aio_write_checks(file, &pos, &count, iolock);
if (ret)
return ret;
......@@ -855,7 +806,6 @@ xfs_file_buffered_aio_write(
unsigned long nr_segs,
loff_t pos,
size_t ocount,
xfs_fsize_t *new_size,
int *iolock)
{
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
......@@ -869,7 +819,7 @@ xfs_file_buffered_aio_write(
*iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
xfs_rw_ilock(ip, *iolock);
ret = xfs_file_aio_write_checks(file, &pos, &count, new_size, iolock);
ret = xfs_file_aio_write_checks(file, &pos, &count, iolock);
if (ret)
return ret;
......@@ -909,7 +859,6 @@ xfs_file_aio_write(
ssize_t ret;
int iolock;
size_t ocount = 0;
xfs_fsize_t new_size = 0;
XFS_STATS_INC(xs_write_calls);
......@@ -929,10 +878,10 @@ xfs_file_aio_write(
if (unlikely(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT))
ret = xfs_file_dio_aio_write(iocb, iovp, nr_segs, pos,
ocount, &new_size, &iolock);
ocount, &iolock);
else
ret = xfs_file_buffered_aio_write(iocb, iovp, nr_segs, pos,
ocount, &new_size, &iolock);
ocount, &iolock);
if (ret <= 0)
goto out_unlock;
......@@ -953,7 +902,6 @@ xfs_file_aio_write(
}
out_unlock:
xfs_aio_write_newsize_update(ip, new_size);
xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, iolock);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ xfs_inode_alloc(
ip->i_update_core = 0;
ip->i_delayed_blks = 0;
memset(&ip->i_d, 0, sizeof(xfs_icdinode_t));
ip->i_new_size = 0;
return ip;
}
......
......@@ -246,8 +246,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_inode {
xfs_icdinode_t i_d; /* most of ondisk inode */
xfs_fsize_t i_new_size; /* size when write completes */
/* VFS inode */
struct inode i_vnode; /* embedded VFS inode */
} xfs_inode_t;
......
......@@ -891,7 +891,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_file_class,
__field(dev_t, dev)
__field(xfs_ino_t, ino)
__field(xfs_fsize_t, size)
__field(xfs_fsize_t, new_size)
__field(loff_t, offset)
__field(size_t, count)
__field(int, flags)
......@@ -900,17 +899,15 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_file_class,
__entry->dev = VFS_I(ip)->i_sb->s_dev;
__entry->ino = ip->i_ino;
__entry->size = ip->i_d.di_size;
__entry->new_size = ip->i_new_size;
__entry->offset = offset;
__entry->count = count;
__entry->flags = flags;
),
TP_printk("dev %d:%d ino 0x%llx size 0x%llx new_size 0x%llx "
TP_printk("dev %d:%d ino 0x%llx size 0x%llx "
"offset 0x%llx count 0x%zx ioflags %s",
MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
__entry->ino,
__entry->size,
__entry->new_size,
__entry->offset,
__entry->count,
__print_flags(__entry->flags, "|", XFS_IO_FLAGS))
......@@ -978,7 +975,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_imap_class,
__field(dev_t, dev)
__field(xfs_ino_t, ino)
__field(loff_t, size)
__field(loff_t, new_size)
__field(loff_t, offset)
__field(size_t, count)
__field(int, type)
......@@ -990,7 +986,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_imap_class,
__entry->dev = VFS_I(ip)->i_sb->s_dev;
__entry->ino = ip->i_ino;
__entry->size = ip->i_d.di_size;
__entry->new_size = ip->i_new_size;
__entry->offset = offset;
__entry->count = count;
__entry->type = type;
......@@ -998,13 +993,11 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_imap_class,
__entry->startblock = irec ? irec->br_startblock : 0;
__entry->blockcount = irec ? irec->br_blockcount : 0;
),
TP_printk("dev %d:%d ino 0x%llx size 0x%llx new_size 0x%llx "
"offset 0x%llx count %zd type %s "
"startoff 0x%llx startblock %lld blockcount 0x%llx",
TP_printk("dev %d:%d ino 0x%llx size 0x%llx offset 0x%llx count %zd "
"type %s startoff 0x%llx startblock %lld blockcount 0x%llx",
MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
__entry->ino,
__entry->size,
__entry->new_size,
__entry->offset,
__entry->count,
__print_symbolic(__entry->type, XFS_IO_TYPES),
......@@ -1031,7 +1024,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_simple_io_class,
__field(xfs_ino_t, ino)
__field(loff_t, isize)
__field(loff_t, disize)
__field(loff_t, new_size)
__field(loff_t, offset)
__field(size_t, count)
),
......@@ -1040,17 +1032,15 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_simple_io_class,
__entry->ino = ip->i_ino;
__entry->isize = VFS_I(ip)->i_size;
__entry->disize = ip->i_d.di_size;
__entry->new_size = ip->i_new_size;
__entry->offset = offset;
__entry->count = count;
),
TP_printk("dev %d:%d ino 0x%llx isize 0x%llx disize 0x%llx new_size 0x%llx "
TP_printk("dev %d:%d ino 0x%llx isize 0x%llx disize 0x%llx "
"offset 0x%llx count %zd",
MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
__entry->ino,
__entry->isize,
__entry->disize,
__entry->new_size,
__entry->offset,
__entry->count)
);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册