[PATCH] radeonfb section mismatches

Marking radeon_pci_register() as __devinit clears up all section
mismatch warnings that are caused by radeon_pci_register() calling
various __devinit function.  Is there some reason not to do this?

WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x628)
WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x6b5)
WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x6bd)
WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:radeon_probe_screens from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x7d6)
WARNING: drivers/video/aty/radeonfb.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:radeon_check_modes from .text.radeonfb_pci_register after 'radeonfb_pci_register' (at offset 0x7e5)
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net>
Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c

@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static struct bin_attribute edid2_attr = {
 };
 
 
-static int radeonfb_pci_register (struct pci_dev *pdev,
+static int __devinit radeonfb_pci_register (struct pci_dev *pdev,
 				  const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 {
 	struct fb_info *info;