提交 209887e6 编写于 作者: V Viresh Kumar 提交者: Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: Return 0 from ->fast_switch() on errors

CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID is a special symbol which is used to specify that
an entry in the cpufreq table is invalid. But using it outside of the
scope of the cpufreq table looks a bit incorrect.

We can represent an invalid frequency by writing it as 0 instead if we
need. Note that it is already done that way for the return value of the
->get() callback.

Lets do the same for ->fast_switch() and not use CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID
outside of the scope of cpufreq table.

Also update the comment over cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() to clearly
mention what this returns.

None of the drivers return CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID as of now from
->fast_switch() callback and so we don't need to update any of those.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
上级 d6344d4b
......@@ -1817,9 +1817,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier);
* twice in parallel for the same policy and that it will never be called in
* parallel with either ->target() or ->target_index() for the same policy.
*
* If CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID is returned by the driver's ->fast_switch()
* callback to indicate an error condition, the hardware configuration must be
* preserved.
* Returns the actual frequency set for the CPU.
*
* If 0 is returned by the driver's ->fast_switch() callback to indicate an
* error condition, the hardware configuration must be preserved.
*/
unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
......
......@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void sugov_update_commit(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
if (policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
next_freq = cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(policy, next_freq);
if (next_freq == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)
if (!next_freq)
return;
policy->cur = next_freq;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册