提交 2086d320 编写于 作者: C Christian Borntraeger 提交者: Paolo Bonzini

KVM: shrink halt polling even more for invalid wakeups

commit 3491caf2 ("KVM: halt_polling: provide a way to qualify
 wakeups during poll") added more aggressive shrinking of the
polling interval if the wakeup did not match some criteria. This
still allows to keep polling enabled if the polling time was
smaller that the current max poll time (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns).
Performance measurement shows that even more aggressive shrinking
(shrink polling on any invalid wakeup) reduces absolute and relative
(to the workload) CPU usage even further.

Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
上级 c4a8de35
......@@ -2055,12 +2055,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
out:
block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
if (halt_poll_ns) {
if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
else if (halt_poll_ns) {
if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
;
/* we had a long block, shrink polling */
else if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu) ||
(vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns))
else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
/* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册