drm/amdgpu: Off by one sanity checks

This is just future proofing code, not something that can be triggered
in real life.  We're testing to make sure we don't shift wrap when we
do "1ull << i" so "i" has to be in the 0-63 range.  If it's 64 then we
have gone too far.
Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c

@@ -4564,7 +4564,7 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kiq_kcq_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 		/* This situation may be hit in the future if a new HW
 		 * generation exposes more than 64 queues. If so, the
 		 * definition of queue_mask needs updating */
-		if (WARN_ON(i > (sizeof(queue_mask)*8))) {
+		if (WARN_ON(i >= (sizeof(queue_mask)*8))) {
 			DRM_ERROR("Invalid KCQ enabled: %d\n", i);
 			break;
 		}

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c

@@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_kiq_kcq_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 		/* This situation may be hit in the future if a new HW
 		 * generation exposes more than 64 queues. If so, the
 		 * definition of queue_mask needs updating */
-		if (WARN_ON(i > (sizeof(queue_mask)*8))) {
+		if (WARN_ON(i >= (sizeof(queue_mask)*8))) {
 			DRM_ERROR("Invalid KCQ enabled: %d\n", i);
 			break;
 		}

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c

@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static int set_sched_resources(struct device_queue_manager *dqm)
 		/* This situation may be hit in the future if a new HW
 		 * generation exposes more than 64 queues. If so, the
 		 * definition of res.queue_mask needs updating */
-		if (WARN_ON(i > (sizeof(res.queue_mask)*8))) {
+		if (WARN_ON(i >= (sizeof(res.queue_mask)*8))) {
 			pr_err("Invalid queue enabled by amdgpu: %d\n", i);
 			break;
 		}