提交 1bfb425b 编写于 作者: V Viresh Kumar 提交者: Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: move policy kobj to update_policy_cpu()

We are calling kobject_move() from two separate places currently and both these
places share another routine update_policy_cpu() which is handling everything
around updating policy->cpu. Moving ownership of policy->kobj also lies under
the role of update_policy_cpu() routine and must be handled from there.

So, Lets move kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() and get rid of
cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() as it doesn't have anything significant left.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
上级 41dfd908
......@@ -1076,10 +1076,20 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
kfree(policy);
}
static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
static int update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu,
struct device *cpu_dev)
{
int ret;
if (WARN_ON(cpu == policy->cpu))
return;
return 0;
/* Move kobject to the new policy->cpu */
ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
return ret;
}
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
......@@ -1090,6 +1100,8 @@ static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU, policy);
return 0;
}
static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
......@@ -1153,12 +1165,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
* the creation of a brand new one. So we need to perform this update
* by invoking update_policy_cpu().
*/
if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu) {
update_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
WARN_ON(kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &dev->kobj));
} else {
if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu)
WARN_ON(update_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev));
else
policy->cpu = cpu;
}
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
......@@ -1309,35 +1319,11 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
return __cpufreq_add_dev(dev, sif);
}
static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int old_cpu)
{
struct device *cpu_dev;
int ret;
/* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */
cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, old_cpu));
sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
if (sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, "cpufreq"))
pr_err("%s: Failed to restore kobj link to cpu:%d\n",
__func__, cpu_dev->id);
return ret;
}
return cpu_dev->id;
}
static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
struct subsys_interface *sif)
{
unsigned int cpu = dev->id, cpus;
int new_cpu, ret;
int ret;
unsigned long flags;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
......@@ -1377,14 +1363,23 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
} else if (cpus > 1) {
new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
if (new_cpu >= 0) {
update_policy_cpu(policy, new_cpu);
/* Nominate new CPU */
int new_cpu = cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, cpu);
struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(new_cpu);
if (!cpufreq_suspended)
pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d from: %d\n",
__func__, new_cpu, cpu);
sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
ret = update_policy_cpu(policy, new_cpu, cpu_dev);
if (ret) {
if (sysfs_create_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
"cpufreq"))
pr_err("%s: Failed to restore kobj link to cpu:%d\n",
__func__, cpu_dev->id);
return ret;
}
if (!cpufreq_suspended)
pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d from: %d\n",
__func__, new_cpu, cpu);
} else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册