提交 1be171d6 编写于 作者: M Michal Hocko 提交者: Linus Torvalds

memcg: track all children over limit in the root

Children in soft limit excess are currently tracked up the hierarchy in
memcg->children_in_excess.  Nevertheless there still might exist tons of
groups that are not in hierarchy relation to the root cgroup (e.g.  all
first level groups if root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy == false).

As the whole tree walk has to be done when the iteration starts at
root_mem_cgroup the iterator should be able to skip the walk if there is
no child above the limit without iterating them.  This can be done
easily if the root tracks all children rather than only hierarchical
children.  This is done by this patch which updates root_mem_cgroup
children_in_excess if root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy == false so the
root knows about all children in excess.

Please note that this is not an issue for inner memcgs which have
use_hierarchy == false because then only the single group is visited so
no special optimization is necessary.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 e839b6a1
...@@ -864,9 +864,15 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_soft_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) ...@@ -864,9 +864,15 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_soft_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
/* /*
* Necessary to update all ancestors when hierarchy is used * Necessary to update all ancestors when hierarchy is used
* because their event counter is not touched. * because their event counter is not touched.
* We track children even outside the hierarchy for the root
* cgroup because tree walk starting at root should visit
* all cgroups and we want to prevent from pointless tree
* walk if no children is below the limit.
*/ */
while (delta && (parent = parent_mem_cgroup(parent))) while (delta && (parent = parent_mem_cgroup(parent)))
atomic_add(delta, &parent->children_in_excess); atomic_add(delta, &parent->children_in_excess);
if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup && !root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy)
atomic_add(delta, &root_mem_cgroup->children_in_excess);
spin_unlock(&memcg->soft_lock); spin_unlock(&memcg->soft_lock);
} }
...@@ -6043,6 +6049,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css) ...@@ -6043,6 +6049,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
if (memcg->soft_contributed) { if (memcg->soft_contributed) {
while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))) while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)))
atomic_dec(&memcg->children_in_excess); atomic_dec(&memcg->children_in_excess);
if (memcg != root_mem_cgroup && !root_mem_cgroup->use_hierarchy)
atomic_dec(&root_mem_cgroup->children_in_excess);
} }
mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(memcg); mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(memcg);
vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure); vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册