提交 1aab92ec 编写于 作者: E Eric B Munson 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code

mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this
comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated.
For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not
ideal.  Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are
allocated, this set creates a middle ground.  Pages are marked to be
placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they
are not faulted in by the mlock call.

This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags
argument along with the start address and size.  This flags argument gives
the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way,
or to be locked after the page is faulted in.  A new MCL flag is added to
mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall().

There are two main use cases that this set covers.  The first is the
security focussed mlock case.  A buffer is needed that cannot be written
to swap.  The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is
significantly less than this maximum.  With lock on fault, the buffer is
guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every
time such a buffer is created.

The second use case is focussed on performance.  Portions of a large file
are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed.
This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the
graph is not known until run time.  The entire graph is unlikely to be
used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay
resident for further processing.  Given these constraints we have a number
of options.  We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking
the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as
the entire file is read in).  We can mlock every page as we access them
without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large
overhead for each access.  The third option is mapping the entire region
with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to
mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page.  Doing this page at a
time adds a significant performance penalty.  Batching can be used to
mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect
pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in
this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler.  This is
precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing.

For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if
mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is
created not when the pages are faulted in.  For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the
user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used.  This decision was made to keep
the accounting checks out of the page fault path.

To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a
5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to
random addresses in that mapping.  The test program was run 20 times for
each setup.  Results are reported for two program portions, setup and
execution.  The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the
entire region.  For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights
the cost of faulting in the entire region.  Results are averages across
the 20 runs in milliseconds.

mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range:
Setup avg:      8228.666
Processing avg: 8274.257

mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access:
Setup avg:      0.113
Processing avg: 90993.552

mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page:
With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt
to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get:
Setup avg:      0.058
Processing avg: 69488.073
mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages:
Setup avg:      0.068
Processing avg: 38204.116

mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages:
Setup avg:      0.044
Processing avg: 29671.180

mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range:
Setup avg:      0.189
Processing avg: 17904.899

The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to
avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping.  The first
step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be
possible to lock.  The second step speculatively tries to mlock and
mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow.  There may be a clever way
to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered
by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find
it.  It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step
fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far
beyond the end of the mapping.

These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the
mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once,
otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster.

The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I
have tested (stream and kernbench).  The following are the average values
across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose
results were discarded.

Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays
Test     4.2-rc1      4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault
Copy:    10,566.5     10,421
Scale:   10,685       10,503.5
Add:     12,044.1     11,814.2
Triad:   12,064.8     11,846.3

Kernbench optimal load
                 4.2-rc1  4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault
Elapsed Time     78.453   78.991
User Time        64.2395  65.2355
System Time      9.7335   9.7085
Context Switches 22211.5  22412.1
Sleeps           14965.3  14956.1

This patch (of 6):

Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently
does not take a flags argument.  A later patch in this set will extend
mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted
in immediately and unlocked pages.  To pave the way for the new system
call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry
point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags.
Signed-off-by: NEric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 eb06f43f
......@@ -554,7 +554,8 @@ static int mlock_fixup(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **prev,
return ret;
}
static int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len, int on)
static int apply_vma_lock_flags(unsigned long start, size_t len,
vm_flags_t flags)
{
unsigned long nstart, end, tmp;
struct vm_area_struct * vma, * prev;
......@@ -576,14 +577,11 @@ static int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len, int on)
prev = vma;
for (nstart = start ; ; ) {
vm_flags_t newflags;
/* Here we know that vma->vm_start <= nstart < vma->vm_end. */
vm_flags_t newflags = vma->vm_flags & ~VM_LOCKED;
newflags = vma->vm_flags & ~VM_LOCKED;
if (on)
newflags |= VM_LOCKED;
newflags |= flags;
/* Here we know that vma->vm_start <= nstart < vma->vm_end. */
tmp = vma->vm_end;
if (tmp > end)
tmp = end;
......@@ -605,7 +603,7 @@ static int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len, int on)
return error;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
static int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len, vm_flags_t flags)
{
unsigned long locked;
unsigned long lock_limit;
......@@ -629,7 +627,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
/* check against resource limits */
if ((locked <= lock_limit) || capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
error = do_mlock(start, len, 1);
error = apply_vma_lock_flags(start, len, flags);
up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
if (error)
......@@ -641,6 +639,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
return 0;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
{
return do_mlock(start, len, VM_LOCKED);
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
{
int ret;
......@@ -649,13 +652,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
start &= PAGE_MASK;
down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
ret = do_mlock(start, len, 0);
ret = apply_vma_lock_flags(start, len, 0);
up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
return ret;
}
static int do_mlockall(int flags)
static int apply_mlockall_flags(int flags)
{
struct vm_area_struct * vma, * prev = NULL;
......@@ -663,6 +666,7 @@ static int do_mlockall(int flags)
current->mm->def_flags |= VM_LOCKED;
else
current->mm->def_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED;
if (flags == MCL_FUTURE)
goto out;
......@@ -703,7 +707,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)
if (!(flags & MCL_CURRENT) || (current->mm->total_vm <= lock_limit) ||
capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
ret = do_mlockall(flags);
ret = apply_mlockall_flags(flags);
up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT))
mm_populate(0, TASK_SIZE);
......@@ -716,7 +720,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(munlockall)
int ret;
down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
ret = do_mlockall(0);
ret = apply_mlockall_flags(0);
up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册