ACPI: implement acpi_os_get_timer() according the spec
ACPI Timer() opcode should return monotonically increasing clock with 100ns granularity according the ACPI 5.0 spec. Testing the current Timer() implementation with following ASL code (and an additional debug print in acpi_os_sleep() to get the sleep times dumped out to dmesg): // Test: 10ms Store(Timer, Local1) Sleep(10) Divide(Subtract(Timer, Local1), 10000,, Local1) Sleep(Local1) // Test: 200ms Store(Timer, Local1) Sleep(200) Divide(Subtract(Timer, Local1), 10000,, Local1) Sleep(Local1) // Test 1300ms Store(Timer, Local1) Sleep(1300) Divide(Subtract(Timer, Local1), 10000,, Local1) Sleep(Local1) The second sleep value is calculated using Timer(). If the implementation is good enough we should be able to get the second value pretty close to the first. However, the current Timer() gives pretty bad sleep times: [ 11.488100] ACPI: acpi_os_get_timer() TBD [ 11.492150] ACPI: Sleep(10) [ 11.502993] ACPI: Sleep(0) [ 11.506315] ACPI: Sleep(200) [ 11.706237] ACPI: Sleep(0) [ 11.709550] ACPI: Sleep(1300) [ 13.008929] ACPI: Sleep(0) Fix this with the help of ktime_get(). Once the fix is applied and run against the same ASL code we get: [ 11.486786] ACPI: Sleep(10) [ 11.499029] ACPI: Sleep(12) [ 11.512350] ACPI: Sleep(200) [ 11.712282] ACPI: Sleep(200) [ 11.912170] ACPI: Sleep(1300) [ 13.211577] ACPI: Sleep(1300) That is much more closer to the values we expected. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录