提交 100eeae2 编写于 作者: J Jiri Slaby 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

TTY: restore tty_ldisc_wait_idle

It was removed in 65b77046 (tty-ldisc: turn ldisc user count into
a proper refcount), but we need to wait for last user to quit the
ldisc before we close it in tty_set_ldisc.

Otherwise weird things start to happen. There might be processes
waiting in tty_read->n_tty_read on tty->read_wait for input to appear
and at that moment, a change of ldisc is fatal. n_tty_close is called,
it frees read_buf and the waiting process is still in the middle of
reading and goes nuts after it is woken.

Previously we prevented close to happen when others are in ldisc ops
by tty_ldisc_wait_idle in tty_set_ldisc. But the commit above removed
that. So revoke the change and test whether there is 1 user (=we), and
allow the close then.

We can do that without ldisc/tty locks, because nobody else can open
the device due to TTY_LDISC_CHANGING bit set, so we in fact wait for
everybody to leave.

I don't understand why tty_ldisc_lock would be needed either when the
counter is an atomic variable, so this is a lockless
tty_ldisc_wait_idle.

On the other hand, if we fail to wait (timeout or signal), we have to
reenable the halted ldiscs, so we take ldisc lock and reuse the setup
path at the end of tty_set_ldisc.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@breakpoint.cc>
LKML-Reference: <20101031104136.GA511@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
LKML-Reference: <1287669539-22644-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org [32, 33, 36]
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
上级 ebf7c066
......@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tty_ldisc_lock);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(tty_ldisc_wait);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(tty_ldisc_idle);
/* Line disc dispatch table */
static struct tty_ldisc_ops *tty_ldiscs[NR_LDISCS];
......@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ static void put_ldisc(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
return;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
wake_up(&tty_ldisc_idle);
}
/**
......@@ -530,6 +532,23 @@ static int tty_ldisc_halt(struct tty_struct *tty)
return cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tty->buf.work);
}
/**
* tty_ldisc_wait_idle - wait for the ldisc to become idle
* @tty: tty to wait for
*
* Wait for the line discipline to become idle. The discipline must
* have been halted for this to guarantee it remains idle.
*/
static int tty_ldisc_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
int ret;
ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(tty_ldisc_idle,
atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users) == 1, 5 * HZ);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
return ret > 0 ? 0 : -EBUSY;
}
/**
* tty_set_ldisc - set line discipline
* @tty: the terminal to set
......@@ -634,8 +653,17 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int ldisc)
flush_scheduled_work();
retval = tty_ldisc_wait_idle(tty);
tty_lock();
mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
/* handle wait idle failure locked */
if (retval) {
tty_ldisc_put(new_ldisc);
goto enable;
}
if (test_bit(TTY_HUPPED, &tty->flags)) {
/* We were raced by the hangup method. It will have stomped
the ldisc data and closed the ldisc down */
......@@ -669,6 +697,7 @@ int tty_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty, int ldisc)
tty_ldisc_put(o_ldisc);
enable:
/*
* Allow ldisc referencing to occur again
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册