cpufreq: Rename cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs()

This routine checks if the CPU running this code belongs to the policy
of the target CPU or if not, can it do remote DVFS for it remotely. But
the current name of it implies as if it is only about doing remote
updates.

Rename it to make it more relevant.
Suggested-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c

@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
 	struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
 	u64 delta_ns, lst;
 
-	if (!cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(policy_dbs->policy))
+	if (!cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update(policy_dbs->policy))
 		return;
 
 	/*

include/linux/cpufreq.h

@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ struct governor_attr {
 			 size_t count);
 };
 
-static inline bool cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static inline bool cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Allow remote callbacks if:

kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time)
 	 * schedule the kthread.
 	 */
 	if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled &&
-	    !cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(sg_policy->policy))
+	    !cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update(sg_policy->policy))
 		return false;
 
 	if (sg_policy->work_in_progress)