Staging: rtl8192e: fix spacing style issues in r8180_93cx6.c

This is a patch to the r8180_93cx6.c file that fixes up spacing issue
warnings found by the checkpatch.pl tool
Signed-off-by: NTim Schofield <tim@weberpafrica.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

drivers/staging/rtl8192e/r8180_93cx6.c

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 
 static void eprom_cs(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
 {
-	if(bit)
+	if (bit)
 		write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
 			       (1<<EPROM_CS_SHIFT) | \
 			       read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)); //enable EPROM
@@ -38,23 +38,23 @@ static void eprom_cs(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
 static void eprom_ck_cycle(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
-		       (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT) | read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD));
+		       (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT) | read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD));
 	force_pci_posting(dev);
 	udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
 	write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
-		       read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) &~ (1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT));
+		       read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & ~(1<<EPROM_CK_SHIFT));
 	force_pci_posting(dev);
 	udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
 }
 
 
-static void eprom_w(struct net_device *dev,short bit)
+static void eprom_w(struct net_device *dev, short bit)
 {
-	if(bit)
+	if (bit)
 		write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, (1<<EPROM_W_SHIFT) | \
-			       read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD));
+			       read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD));
 	else
-		write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev,EPROM_CMD)\
+		write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD, read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD)\
 			       &~(1<<EPROM_W_SHIFT));
 
 	force_pci_posting(dev);
@@ -66,10 +66,11 @@ static short eprom_r(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	short bit;
 
-	bit=(read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & (1<<EPROM_R_SHIFT) );
+	bit = (read_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD) & (1<<EPROM_R_SHIFT));
 	udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
 
-	if(bit) return 1;
+	if (bit)
+		return 1;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ static void eprom_send_bits_string(struct net_device *dev, short b[], int len)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for(i=0; i<len; i++){
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
 		eprom_w(dev, b[i]);
 		eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
 	}
@@ -88,37 +89,37 @@ static void eprom_send_bits_string(struct net_device *dev, short b[], int len)
 u32 eprom_read(struct net_device *dev, u32 addr)
 {
 	struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
-	short read_cmd[]={1,1,0};
+	short read_cmd[] = {1, 1, 0};
 	short addr_str[8];
 	int i;
 	int addr_len;
 	u32 ret;
 
-	ret=0;
+	ret = 0;
         //enable EPROM programming
 	write_nic_byte(dev, EPROM_CMD,
 		       (EPROM_CMD_PROGRAM<<EPROM_CMD_OPERATING_MODE_SHIFT));
 	force_pci_posting(dev);
 	udelay(EPROM_DELAY);
 
-	if (priv->epromtype==EPROM_93c56){
-		addr_str[7]=addr & 1;
-		addr_str[6]=addr & (1<<1);
-		addr_str[5]=addr & (1<<2);
-		addr_str[4]=addr & (1<<3);
-		addr_str[3]=addr & (1<<4);
-		addr_str[2]=addr & (1<<5);
-		addr_str[1]=addr & (1<<6);
-		addr_str[0]=addr & (1<<7);
-		addr_len=8;
-	}else{
-		addr_str[5]=addr & 1;
-		addr_str[4]=addr & (1<<1);
-		addr_str[3]=addr & (1<<2);
-		addr_str[2]=addr & (1<<3);
-		addr_str[1]=addr & (1<<4);
-		addr_str[0]=addr & (1<<5);
-		addr_len=6;
+	if (priv->epromtype == EPROM_93c56) {
+		addr_str[7] = addr & 1;
+		addr_str[6] = addr & (1<<1);
+		addr_str[5] = addr & (1<<2);
+		addr_str[4] = addr & (1<<3);
+		addr_str[3] = addr & (1<<4);
+		addr_str[2] = addr & (1<<5);
+		addr_str[1] = addr & (1<<6);
+		addr_str[0] = addr & (1<<7);
+		addr_len = 8;
+	} else {
+		addr_str[5] = addr & 1;
+		addr_str[4] = addr & (1<<1);
+		addr_str[3] = addr & (1<<2);
+		addr_str[2] = addr & (1<<3);
+		addr_str[1] = addr & (1<<4);
+		addr_str[0] = addr & (1<<5);
+		addr_len = 6;
 	}
 	eprom_cs(dev, 1);
 	eprom_ck_cycle(dev);
@@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ u32 eprom_read(struct net_device *dev, u32 addr)
 	//I'm unsure if it is necessary, but anyway shouldn't hurt
 	eprom_w(dev, 0);
 
-	for(i=0;i<16;i++){
+	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
 		//eeprom needs a clk cycle between writing opcode&adr
 		//and reading data. (eeprom outs a dummy 0)
 		eprom_ck_cycle(dev);