-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
irq_move_masked_irq() checks the return code of chip->irq_set_affinity() only for 0, but IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY is also a valid return code, which is there to avoid a redundant copy of the cpumask. But in case of IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY we not only avoid the redundant copy, we also fail to adjust the thread affinity of an eventually threaded interrupt handler. Handle IRQ_SET_MASK_OK (==0) and IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY(==1) return values correctly by checking the valid return values seperately. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Cc: Keping Chen <chenkeping@huawei.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333120296-13563-2-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
f5cb92ac