As illustrated by commit a3afe70b ("[S390] latencytop s390
support."), HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT is defined by an architecture to
advertise an implementation of save_stack_trace_tsk.

However, as of 9212ddb5 ("stacktrace: provide save_stack_trace_tsk()
weak alias") a dummy implementation is provided if STACKTRACE=y.  Given
that LATENCYTOP already depends on STACKTRACE_SUPPORT and selects
STACKTRACE, we can remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT altogether.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Acked-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>