-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
I'll shortly be introducing another seqcount primitive that's useful to provide ordering semantics and would like to use the write_seqcount_barrier() name for that. Seeing how there's only one user of the current primitive, lets rename it to invalidate, as that appears what its doing. While there, employ lockdep_assert_held() instead of assert_spin_locked() to not generate debug code for regular kernels. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124743.279926217@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
a7c6f571