-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
putreg() assumes that the tracee is not running and pt_regs_access() can safely play with its stack. However a killed tracee can return from ptrace_stop() to the low-level asm code and do RESTORE_REST, this means that debugger can actually read/modify the kernel stack until the tracee does SAVE_REST again. set_task_blockstep() can race with SIGKILL too and in some sense this race is even worse, the very fact the tracee can be woken up breaks the logic. As Linus suggested we can clear TASK_WAKEKILL around the arch_ptrace() call, this ensures that nobody can ever wakeup the tracee while the debugger looks at it. Not only this fixes the mentioned problems, we can do some cleanups/simplifications in arch_ptrace() paths. Probably ptrace_unfreeze_traced() needs more callers, for example it makes sense to make the tracee killable for oom-killer before access_process_vm(). While at it, add the comment into may_ptrace_stop() to explain why ptrace_stop() still can't rely on SIGKILL and signal_pending_state(). Reported-by: NSalman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Reported-by: NSuleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com> Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
9899d11f