The rport structure defines dev_loss_tmo as u32, which is
later multiplied with HZ to get the actual timeout value.
This might overflow for large dev_loss_tmo values. So we
should be better using u64 as intermediate variables here
to protect against overflow.
Signed-off-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Acked-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>