Vince reported the perf_fuzzer giving various unwinder warnings and
Josh reported:

> Deja vu.  Most of these are related to perf PEBS, similar to the
> following issue:
>
>   b8000586 ("perf/x86/intel: Cure bogus unwind from PEBS entries")
>
> This is basically the ORC version of that.  setup_pebs_sample_data() is
> assembling a franken-pt_regs which ORC isn't happy about.  RIP is
> inconsistent with some of the other registers (like RSP and RBP).

And where the previous unwinder only needed BP,SP ORC also requires
IP. But we cannot spoof IP because then the sample will get displaced,
entirely negating the point of PEBS.

So cure the whole thing differently by doing the unwind early; this
does however require a means to communicate we did the unwind early.
We (ab)use an unused sample_type bit for this, which we set on events
that fill out the data->callchain before the normal
perf_prepare_sample().
Debugged-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Tested-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NPrashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>