-
由 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 提交于
At accounting file events per memory cgroup, we need to find memory cgroup via page_cgroup->mem_cgroup. Now, we use lock_page_cgroup() for guarantee pc->mem_cgroup is not overwritten while we make use of it. But, considering the context which page-cgroup for files are accessed, we can use alternative light-weight mutual execusion in the most case. At handling file-caches, the only race we have to take care of is "moving" account, IOW, overwriting page_cgroup->mem_cgroup. (See comment in the patch) Unlike charge/uncharge, "move" happens not so frequently. It happens only when rmdir() and task-moving (with a special settings.) This patch adds a race-checker for file-cache-status accounting v.s. account moving. The new per-cpu-per-memcg counter MEM_CGROUP_ON_MOVE is added. The routine for account move 1. Increment it before start moving 2. Call synchronize_rcu() 3. Decrement it after the end of moving. By this, file-status-counting routine can check it needs to call lock_page_cgroup(). In most case, I doesn't need to call it. Following is a perf data of a process which mmap()/munmap 32MB of file cache in a minute. Before patch: 28.25% mmap mmap [.] main 22.64% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] page_fault 9.96% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped 3.67% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] filemap_fault 3.50% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] unmap_vmas 2.99% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __do_fault 2.76% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] find_get_page After patch: 30.00% mmap mmap [.] main 23.78% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] page_fault 5.52% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped 3.81% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] unmap_vmas 3.26% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] find_get_page 3.18% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __do_fault 3.03% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] filemap_fault 2.40% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] handle_mm_fault 2.40% mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_page_fault This patch reduces memcg's cost to some extent. (mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped is called by both of map/unmap) Note: It seems some more improvements are required..but no idea. maybe removing set/unset flag is required. Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDaisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
32047e2a