-
由 Phil Sutter 提交于
The biggest difference between rb532_pata_data_xfer() and ata_sff_data_xfer32() is the call to ata_sff_pause() at the end of rb532_pata_data_xfer() which I suppose to be unnecessary since it works without. I've also tested using ata_sff_data_xfer() as replacement, but since we know that the driver supports 32bit IO, using the optimised version should be safe. Signed-off-by: NPhil Sutter <n0-1@freewrt.org> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
180bd147