We restored tty_ldisc_wait_idle in 100eeae2 (TTY: restore
tty_ldisc_wait_idle). We used it in the ldisc changing path to fix the
case where there are tasks in n_tty_read waiting for data and somebody
tries to change ldisc.

Similar to the case above, there may be also tasks waiting in
n_tty_read while hangup is performed. As 65b77046 (tty-ldisc: turn
ldisc user count into a proper refcount) removed the wait-until-idle
from all paths, hangup path won't wait for them to disappear either
now. So add it back even to the hangup path.

There is a difference, we need uninterruptible sleep as there is
obviously HUP signal pending. So tty_ldisc_wait_idle now sleeps
without possibility to be interrupted. This is what original
tty_ldisc_wait_idle did. After the wait idle reintroduction
(100eeae2), we have had interruptible sleeps for the ldisc changing
path. But as there is a 5s timeout anyway, we don't allow it to be
interrupted from now on. It's not worth the added complexity of
deciding what kind of sleep we want.

Before 65b77046 tty_ldisc_release was called also from
tty_ldisc_release. It is called from tty_release, so I don't think we
need to restore that one.

This is nicely reproducible after constifying the timing when
drivers/tty/n_tty.c is patched as follows ("TTY: ntty, add one more
sanity check" patch is needed to actually see it explode):
%% -1548,6 +1549,7 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)

        /* These are ugly. Currently a malloc failure here can panic */
        if (!tty->read_buf) {
+               msleep(100);
                tty->read_buf = kzalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!tty->read_buf)
                        return -ENOMEM;
%% -1785,6 +1788,7 @@ do_it_again:
                                break;
                        }
                        timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
+                       msleep(20);
                        continue;
                }
                __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
===== With a process: =====
    while (1) {
        int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR);
        read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
        close(fd);
    }
===== and its child: =====
        setsid();
        while (1) {
                int fd = open(tty, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY);
                ioctl(fd, TIOCSCTTY, 1);
                vhangup();
                close(fd);
                usleep(100 * (10 + random() % 1000));
        }
===== EOF =====

References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693374
References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694509Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> [32, 33, 34, 39]
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>