memory.txt 15.7 KB
Newer Older
1 2 3 4 5
Memory Resource Controller

NOTE: The Memory Resource Controller has been generically been referred
to as the memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory controller
used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware.
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
6 7 8

Salient features

B
Bharata B Rao 已提交
9 10
a. Enable control of Anonymous, Page Cache (mapped and unmapped) and
   Swap Cache memory pages.
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
b. The infrastructure allows easy addition of other types of memory to control
c. Provides *zero overhead* for non memory controller users
d. Provides a double LRU: global memory pressure causes reclaim from the
   global LRU; a cgroup on hitting a limit, reclaims from the per
   cgroup LRU

Benefits and Purpose of the memory controller

The memory controller isolates the memory behaviour of a group of tasks
from the rest of the system. The article on LWN [12] mentions some probable
uses of the memory controller. The memory controller can be used to

a. Isolate an application or a group of applications
   Memory hungry applications can be isolated and limited to a smaller
   amount of memory.
b. Create a cgroup with limited amount of memory, this can be used
   as a good alternative to booting with mem=XXXX.
c. Virtualization solutions can control the amount of memory they want
   to assign to a virtual machine instance.
d. A CD/DVD burner could control the amount of memory used by the
   rest of the system to ensure that burning does not fail due to lack
   of available memory.
e. There are several other use cases, find one or use the controller just
   for fun (to learn and hack on the VM subsystem).

1. History

The memory controller has a long history. A request for comments for the memory
controller was posted by Balbir Singh [1]. At the time the RFC was posted
there were several implementations for memory control. The goal of the
RFC was to build consensus and agreement for the minimal features required
for memory control. The first RSS controller was posted by Balbir Singh[2]
in Feb 2007. Pavel Emelianov [3][4][5] has since posted three versions of the
RSS controller. At OLS, at the resource management BoF, everyone suggested
that we handle both page cache and RSS together. Another request was raised
to allow user space handling of OOM. The current memory controller is
at version 6; it combines both mapped (RSS) and unmapped Page
Cache Control [11].

2. Memory Control

Memory is a unique resource in the sense that it is present in a limited
amount. If a task requires a lot of CPU processing, the task can spread
its processing over a period of hours, days, months or years, but with
memory, the same physical memory needs to be reused to accomplish the task.

The memory controller implementation has been divided into phases. These
are:

1. Memory controller
2. mlock(2) controller
3. Kernel user memory accounting and slab control
4. user mappings length controller

The memory controller is the first controller developed.

2.1. Design

The core of the design is a counter called the res_counter. The res_counter
tracks the current memory usage and limit of the group of processes associated
with the controller. Each cgroup has a memory controller specific data
structure (mem_cgroup) associated with it.

2.2. Accounting

		+--------------------+
		|  mem_cgroup     |
		|  (res_counter)     |
		+--------------------+
		 /            ^      \
		/             |       \
           +---------------+  |        +---------------+
           | mm_struct     |  |....    | mm_struct     |
           |               |  |        |               |
           +---------------+  |        +---------------+
                              |
                              + --------------+
                                              |
           +---------------+           +------+--------+
           | page          +---------->  page_cgroup|
           |               |           |               |
           +---------------+           +---------------+

             (Figure 1: Hierarchy of Accounting)


Figure 1 shows the important aspects of the controller

1. Accounting happens per cgroup
2. Each mm_struct knows about which cgroup it belongs to
3. Each page has a pointer to the page_cgroup, which in turn knows the
   cgroup it belongs to

The accounting is done as follows: mem_cgroup_charge() is invoked to setup
the necessary data structures and check if the cgroup that is being charged
is over its limit. If it is then reclaim is invoked on the cgroup.
More details can be found in the reclaim section of this document.
If everything goes well, a page meta-data-structure called page_cgroup is
allocated and associated with the page.  This routine also adds the page to
the per cgroup LRU.

2.2.1 Accounting details

114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129
All mapped anon pages (RSS) and cache pages (Page Cache) are accounted.
(some pages which never be reclaimable and will not be on global LRU
 are not accounted. we just accounts pages under usual vm management.)

RSS pages are accounted at page_fault unless they've already been accounted
for earlier. A file page will be accounted for as Page Cache when it's
inserted into inode (radix-tree). While it's mapped into the page tables of
processes, duplicate accounting is carefully avoided.

A RSS page is unaccounted when it's fully unmapped. A PageCache page is
unaccounted when it's removed from radix-tree.

At page migration, accounting information is kept.

Note: we just account pages-on-lru because our purpose is to control amount
of used pages. not-on-lru pages are tend to be out-of-control from vm view.
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138

2.3 Shared Page Accounting

Shared pages are accounted on the basis of the first touch approach. The
cgroup that first touches a page is accounted for the page. The principle
behind this approach is that a cgroup that aggressively uses a shared
page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from
the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure).

139 140
Exception: If CONFIG_CGROUP_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is not used..
When you do swapoff and make swapped-out pages of shmem(tmpfs) to
K
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 已提交
141 142 143 144
be backed into memory in force, charges for pages are accounted against the
caller of swapoff rather than the users of shmem.


145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154
2.4 Swap Extension (CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP)
Swap Extension allows you to record charge for swap. A swapped-in page is
charged back to original page allocator if possible.

When swap is accounted, following files are added.
 - memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes.
 - memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes.

usage of mem+swap is limited by memsw.limit_in_bytes.

155
* why 'mem+swap' rather than swap.
156 157
The global LRU(kswapd) can swap out arbitrary pages. Swap-out means
to move account from memory to swap...there is no change in usage of
158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167
mem+swap. In other words, when we want to limit the usage of swap without
affecting global LRU, mem+swap limit is better than just limiting swap from
OS point of view.

* What happens when a cgroup hits memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
When a cgroup his memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes, it's useless to do swap-out
in this cgroup. Then, swap-out will not be done by cgroup routine and file
caches are dropped. But as mentioned above, global LRU can do swapout memory
from it for sanity of the system's memory management state. You can't forbid
it by cgroup.
168 169

2.5 Reclaim
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186

Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU that consists of an active
and inactive list. When a cgroup goes over its limit, we first try
to reclaim memory from the cgroup so as to make space for the new
pages that the cgroup has touched. If the reclaim is unsuccessful,
an OOM routine is invoked to select and kill the bulkiest task in the
cgroup.

The reclaim algorithm has not been modified for cgroups, except that
pages that are selected for reclaiming come from the per cgroup LRU
list.

2. Locking

The memory controller uses the following hierarchy

1. zone->lru_lock is used for selecting pages to be isolated
187
2. mem->per_zone->lru_lock protects the per cgroup LRU (per zone)
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195
3. lock_page_cgroup() is used to protect page->page_cgroup

3. User Interface

0. Configuration

a. Enable CONFIG_CGROUPS
b. Enable CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS
196
c. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207

1. Prepare the cgroups
# mkdir -p /cgroups
# mount -t cgroup none /cgroups -o memory

2. Make the new group and move bash into it
# mkdir /cgroups/0
# echo $$ >  /cgroups/0/tasks

Since now we're in the 0 cgroup,
We can alter the memory limit:
208
# echo 4M > /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
209 210 211

NOTE: We can use a suffix (k, K, m, M, g or G) to indicate values in kilo,
mega or gigabytes.
212
NOTE: We can write "-1" to reset the *.limit_in_bytes(unlimited).
213 214

# cat /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes
215
4194304
216 217 218

NOTE: The interface has now changed to display the usage in bytes
instead of pages
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
219 220

We can check the usage:
221
# cat /cgroups/0/memory.usage_in_bytes
222
1216512
223 224 225 226 227 228 229

A successful write to this file does not guarantee a successful set of
this limit to the value written into the file.  This can be due to a
number of factors, such as rounding up to page boundaries or the total
availability of memory on the system.  The user is required to re-read
this file after a write to guarantee the value committed by the kernel.

230
# echo 1 > memory.limit_in_bytes
231
# cat memory.limit_in_bytes
232
4096
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
233 234 235 236

The memory.failcnt field gives the number of times that the cgroup limit was
exceeded.

237 238 239
The memory.stat file gives accounting information. Now, the number of
caches, RSS and Active pages/Inactive pages are shown.

B
Balbir Singh 已提交
240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268
4. Testing

Balbir posted lmbench, AIM9, LTP and vmmstress results [10] and [11].
Apart from that v6 has been tested with several applications and regular
daily use. The controller has also been tested on the PPC64, x86_64 and
UML platforms.

4.1 Troubleshooting

Sometimes a user might find that the application under a cgroup is
terminated. There are several causes for this:

1. The cgroup limit is too low (just too low to do anything useful)
2. The user is using anonymous memory and swap is turned off or too low

A sync followed by echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches will help get rid of
some of the pages cached in the cgroup (page cache pages).

4.2 Task migration

When a task migrates from one cgroup to another, it's charge is not
carried forward. The pages allocated from the original cgroup still
remain charged to it, the charge is dropped when the page is freed or
reclaimed.

4.3 Removing a cgroup

A cgroup can be removed by rmdir, but as discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2, a
cgroup might have some charge associated with it, even though all
269
tasks have migrated away from it.
270 271 272
Such charges are freed(at default) or moved to its parent. When moved,
both of RSS and CACHES are moved to parent.
If both of them are busy, rmdir() returns -EBUSY. See 5.1 Also.
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
273

274 275 276 277 278
Charges recorded in swap information is not updated at removal of cgroup.
Recorded information is discarded and a cgroup which uses swap (swapcache)
will be charged as a new owner of it.


279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296
5. Misc. interfaces.

5.1 force_empty
  memory.force_empty interface is provided to make cgroup's memory usage empty.
  You can use this interface only when the cgroup has no tasks.
  When writing anything to this

  # echo 0 > memory.force_empty

  Almost all pages tracked by this memcg will be unmapped and freed. Some of
  pages cannot be freed because it's locked or in-use. Such pages are moved
  to parent and this cgroup will be empty. But this may return -EBUSY in
  some too busy case.

  Typical use case of this interface is that calling this before rmdir().
  Because rmdir() moves all pages to parent, some out-of-use page caches can be
  moved to the parent. If you want to avoid that, force_empty will be useful.

K
KOSAKI Motohiro 已提交
297
5.2 stat file
B
Bharata B Rao 已提交
298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321

memory.stat file includes following statistics

cache		- # of bytes of page cache memory.
rss		- # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory.
pgpgin		- # of pages paged in (equivalent to # of charging events).
pgpgout		- # of pages paged out (equivalent to # of uncharging events).
active_anon	- # of bytes of anonymous and  swap cache memory on active
		  lru list.
inactive_anon	- # of bytes of anonymous memory and swap cache memory on
		  inactive lru list.
active_file	- # of bytes of file-backed memory on active lru list.
inactive_file	- # of bytes of file-backed memory on inactive lru list.
unevictable	- # of bytes of memory that cannot be reclaimed (mlocked etc).

The following additional stats are dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.

inactive_ratio		- VM internal parameter. (see mm/page_alloc.c)
recent_rotated_anon	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
recent_rotated_file	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
recent_scanned_anon	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)
recent_scanned_file	- VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c)

Memo:
K
KOSAKI Motohiro 已提交
322 323 324 325
	recent_rotated means recent frequency of lru rotation.
	recent_scanned means recent # of scans to lru.
	showing for better debug please see the code for meanings.

B
Bharata B Rao 已提交
326 327 328 329 330
Note:
	Only anonymous and swap cache memory is listed as part of 'rss' stat.
	This should not be confused with the true 'resident set size' or the
	amount of physical memory used by the cgroup. Per-cgroup rss
	accounting is not done yet.
K
KOSAKI Motohiro 已提交
331

K
KOSAKI Motohiro 已提交
332 333 334
5.3 swappiness
  Similar to /proc/sys/vm/swappiness, but affecting a hierarchy of groups only.

B
Bharata B Rao 已提交
335
  Following cgroups' swapiness can't be changed.
K
KOSAKI Motohiro 已提交
336 337 338 339 340
  - root cgroup (uses /proc/sys/vm/swappiness).
  - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and it has child cgroup.
  - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and not the root of hierarchy.


341
6. Hierarchy support
342

343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378
The memory controller supports a deep hierarchy and hierarchical accounting.
The hierarchy is created by creating the appropriate cgroups in the
cgroup filesystem. Consider for example, the following cgroup filesystem
hierarchy

		root
	     /  |   \
           /	|    \
	  a	b	c
			| \
			|  \
			d   e

In the diagram above, with hierarchical accounting enabled, all memory
usage of e, is accounted to its ancestors up until the root (i.e, c and root),
that has memory.use_hierarchy enabled.  If one of the ancestors goes over its
limit, the reclaim algorithm reclaims from the tasks in the ancestor and the
children of the ancestor.

6.1 Enabling hierarchical accounting and reclaim

The memory controller by default disables the hierarchy feature. Support
can be enabled by writing 1 to memory.use_hierarchy file of the root cgroup

# echo 1 > memory.use_hierarchy

The feature can be disabled by

# echo 0 > memory.use_hierarchy

NOTE1: Enabling/disabling will fail if the cgroup already has other
cgroups created below it.

NOTE2: This feature can be enabled/disabled per subtree.

7. TODO
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
379 380

1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller)
381 382
2. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first
3. Teach controller to account for shared-pages
383
4. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398
   not yet hit but the usage is getting closer

Summary

Overall, the memory controller has been a stable controller and has been
commented and discussed quite extensively in the community.

References

1. Singh, Balbir. RFC: Memory Controller, http://lwn.net/Articles/206697/
2. Singh, Balbir. Memory Controller (RSS Control),
   http://lwn.net/Articles/222762/
3. Emelianov, Pavel. Resource controllers based on process cgroups
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/198
4. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v2)
399
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/9/78
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
400 401 402 403 404
5. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v3)
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/244
6. Menage, Paul. Control Groups v10, http://lwn.net/Articles/236032/
7. Vaidyanathan, Srinivasan, Control Groups: Pagecache accounting and control
   subsystem (v3), http://lwn.net/Articles/235534/
405
8. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 test results (lmbench),
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
406
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/17/232
407
9. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 AIM9 results
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
408
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/1
409
10. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller v6 test results,
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
410
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/19/36
411 412
11. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller introduction (v6),
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/69
B
Balbir Singh 已提交
413 414
12. Corbet, Jonathan, Controlling memory use in cgroups,
    http://lwn.net/Articles/243795/