menu.c 11.8 KB
Newer Older
1 2 3 4
/*
 * menu.c - the menu idle governor
 *
 * Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>
5 6 7
 * Copyright (C) 2009 Intel Corporation
 * Author:
 *        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
8
 *
9 10
 * This code is licenced under the GPL version 2 as described
 * in the COPYING file that acompanies the Linux Kernel.
11 12 13 14
 */

#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
M
Mark Gross 已提交
15
#include <linux/pm_qos_params.h>
16 17 18 19
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/ktime.h>
#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
20
#include <linux/sched.h>
21
#include <linux/math64.h>
22

23
#define BUCKETS 12
24
#define INTERVALS 8
25
#define RESOLUTION 1024
26
#define DECAY 8
27
#define MAX_INTERESTING 50000
28 29
#define STDDEV_THRESH 400

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69

/*
 * Concepts and ideas behind the menu governor
 *
 * For the menu governor, there are 3 decision factors for picking a C
 * state:
 * 1) Energy break even point
 * 2) Performance impact
 * 3) Latency tolerance (from pmqos infrastructure)
 * These these three factors are treated independently.
 *
 * Energy break even point
 * -----------------------
 * C state entry and exit have an energy cost, and a certain amount of time in
 * the  C state is required to actually break even on this cost. CPUIDLE
 * provides us this duration in the "target_residency" field. So all that we
 * need is a good prediction of how long we'll be idle. Like the traditional
 * menu governor, we start with the actual known "next timer event" time.
 *
 * Since there are other source of wakeups (interrupts for example) than
 * the next timer event, this estimation is rather optimistic. To get a
 * more realistic estimate, a correction factor is applied to the estimate,
 * that is based on historic behavior. For example, if in the past the actual
 * duration always was 50% of the next timer tick, the correction factor will
 * be 0.5.
 *
 * menu uses a running average for this correction factor, however it uses a
 * set of factors, not just a single factor. This stems from the realization
 * that the ratio is dependent on the order of magnitude of the expected
 * duration; if we expect 500 milliseconds of idle time the likelihood of
 * getting an interrupt very early is much higher than if we expect 50 micro
 * seconds of idle time. A second independent factor that has big impact on
 * the actual factor is if there is (disk) IO outstanding or not.
 * (as a special twist, we consider every sleep longer than 50 milliseconds
 * as perfect; there are no power gains for sleeping longer than this)
 *
 * For these two reasons we keep an array of 12 independent factors, that gets
 * indexed based on the magnitude of the expected duration as well as the
 * "is IO outstanding" property.
 *
70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
 * Repeatable-interval-detector
 * ----------------------------
 * There are some cases where "next timer" is a completely unusable predictor:
 * Those cases where the interval is fixed, for example due to hardware
 * interrupt mitigation, but also due to fixed transfer rate devices such as
 * mice.
 * For this, we use a different predictor: We track the duration of the last 8
 * intervals and if the stand deviation of these 8 intervals is below a
 * threshold value, we use the average of these intervals as prediction.
 *
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109
 * Limiting Performance Impact
 * ---------------------------
 * C states, especially those with large exit latencies, can have a real
 * noticable impact on workloads, which is not acceptable for most sysadmins,
 * and in addition, less performance has a power price of its own.
 *
 * As a general rule of thumb, menu assumes that the following heuristic
 * holds:
 *     The busier the system, the less impact of C states is acceptable
 *
 * This rule-of-thumb is implemented using a performance-multiplier:
 * If the exit latency times the performance multiplier is longer than
 * the predicted duration, the C state is not considered a candidate
 * for selection due to a too high performance impact. So the higher
 * this multiplier is, the longer we need to be idle to pick a deep C
 * state, and thus the less likely a busy CPU will hit such a deep
 * C state.
 *
 * Two factors are used in determing this multiplier:
 * a value of 10 is added for each point of "per cpu load average" we have.
 * a value of 5 points is added for each process that is waiting for
 * IO on this CPU.
 * (these values are experimentally determined)
 *
 * The load average factor gives a longer term (few seconds) input to the
 * decision, while the iowait value gives a cpu local instantanious input.
 * The iowait factor may look low, but realize that this is also already
 * represented in the system load average.
 *
 */
110 111 112

struct menu_device {
	int		last_state_idx;
113
	int             needs_update;
114 115

	unsigned int	expected_us;
116
	u64		predicted_us;
117 118 119
	unsigned int	exit_us;
	unsigned int	bucket;
	u64		correction_factor[BUCKETS];
120 121
	u32		intervals[INTERVALS];
	int		interval_ptr;
122 123
};

124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182

#define LOAD_INT(x) ((x) >> FSHIFT)
#define LOAD_FRAC(x) LOAD_INT(((x) & (FIXED_1-1)) * 100)

static int get_loadavg(void)
{
	unsigned long this = this_cpu_load();


	return LOAD_INT(this) * 10 + LOAD_FRAC(this) / 10;
}

static inline int which_bucket(unsigned int duration)
{
	int bucket = 0;

	/*
	 * We keep two groups of stats; one with no
	 * IO pending, one without.
	 * This allows us to calculate
	 * E(duration)|iowait
	 */
	if (nr_iowait_cpu())
		bucket = BUCKETS/2;

	if (duration < 10)
		return bucket;
	if (duration < 100)
		return bucket + 1;
	if (duration < 1000)
		return bucket + 2;
	if (duration < 10000)
		return bucket + 3;
	if (duration < 100000)
		return bucket + 4;
	return bucket + 5;
}

/*
 * Return a multiplier for the exit latency that is intended
 * to take performance requirements into account.
 * The more performance critical we estimate the system
 * to be, the higher this multiplier, and thus the higher
 * the barrier to go to an expensive C state.
 */
static inline int performance_multiplier(void)
{
	int mult = 1;

	/* for higher loadavg, we are more reluctant */

	mult += 2 * get_loadavg();

	/* for IO wait tasks (per cpu!) we add 5x each */
	mult += 10 * nr_iowait_cpu();

	return mult;
}

183 184
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);

185 186
static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_device *dev);

187 188 189 190 191 192
/* This implements DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST but avoids 64 bit division */
static u64 div_round64(u64 dividend, u32 divisor)
{
	return div_u64(dividend + (divisor / 2), divisor);
}

193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228
/*
 * Try detecting repeating patterns by keeping track of the last 8
 * intervals, and checking if the standard deviation of that set
 * of points is below a threshold. If it is... then use the
 * average of these 8 points as the estimated value.
 */
static void detect_repeating_patterns(struct menu_device *data)
{
	int i;
	uint64_t avg = 0;
	uint64_t stddev = 0; /* contains the square of the std deviation */

	/* first calculate average and standard deviation of the past */
	for (i = 0; i < INTERVALS; i++)
		avg += data->intervals[i];
	avg = avg / INTERVALS;

	/* if the avg is beyond the known next tick, it's worthless */
	if (avg > data->expected_us)
		return;

	for (i = 0; i < INTERVALS; i++)
		stddev += (data->intervals[i] - avg) *
			  (data->intervals[i] - avg);

	stddev = stddev / INTERVALS;

	/*
	 * now.. if stddev is small.. then assume we have a
	 * repeating pattern and predict we keep doing this.
	 */

	if (avg && stddev < STDDEV_THRESH)
		data->predicted_us = avg;
}

229 230 231 232 233 234 235
/**
 * menu_select - selects the next idle state to enter
 * @dev: the CPU
 */
static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
	struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
M
Mark Gross 已提交
236
	int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
237
	int i;
238 239
	int multiplier;

240 241 242 243 244
	if (data->needs_update) {
		menu_update(dev);
		data->needs_update = 0;
	}

245 246 247
	data->last_state_idx = 0;
	data->exit_us = 0;

248
	/* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
249
	if (unlikely(latency_req == 0))
250 251
		return 0;

252
	/* determine the expected residency time, round up */
253
	data->expected_us =
254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268
	    DIV_ROUND_UP((u32)ktime_to_ns(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length()), 1000);


	data->bucket = which_bucket(data->expected_us);

	multiplier = performance_multiplier();

	/*
	 * if the correction factor is 0 (eg first time init or cpu hotplug
	 * etc), we actually want to start out with a unity factor.
	 */
	if (data->correction_factor[data->bucket] == 0)
		data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = RESOLUTION * DECAY;

	/* Make sure to round up for half microseconds */
269 270
	data->predicted_us = div_round64(data->expected_us * data->correction_factor[data->bucket],
					 RESOLUTION * DECAY);
271

272 273
	detect_repeating_patterns(data);

274 275 276 277 278 279
	/*
	 * We want to default to C1 (hlt), not to busy polling
	 * unless the timer is happening really really soon.
	 */
	if (data->expected_us > 5)
		data->last_state_idx = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START;
280

281

282
	/* find the deepest idle state that satisfies our constraints */
283
	for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < dev->state_count; i++) {
284 285 286 287
		struct cpuidle_state *s = &dev->states[i];

		if (s->target_residency > data->predicted_us)
			break;
288
		if (s->exit_latency > latency_req)
289
			break;
290 291 292 293
		if (s->exit_latency * multiplier > data->predicted_us)
			break;
		data->exit_us = s->exit_latency;
		data->last_state_idx = i;
294 295
	}

296
	return data->last_state_idx;
297 298 299
}

/**
300
 * menu_reflect - records that data structures need update
301 302 303 304 305 306
 * @dev: the CPU
 *
 * NOTE: it's important to be fast here because this operation will add to
 *       the overall exit latency.
 */
static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316
{
	struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
	data->needs_update = 1;
}

/**
 * menu_update - attempts to guess what happened after entry
 * @dev: the CPU
 */
static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
317 318 319
{
	struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
	int last_idx = data->last_state_idx;
320
	unsigned int last_idle_us = cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev);
321
	struct cpuidle_state *target = &dev->states[last_idx];
322
	unsigned int measured_us;
323
	u64 new_factor;
324 325 326 327

	/*
	 * Ugh, this idle state doesn't support residency measurements, so we
	 * are basically lost in the dark.  As a compromise, assume we slept
328
	 * for the whole expected time.
329
	 */
330
	if (unlikely(!(target->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID)))
331 332 333 334
		last_idle_us = data->expected_us;


	measured_us = last_idle_us;
335

336
	/*
337 338
	 * We correct for the exit latency; we are assuming here that the
	 * exit latency happens after the event that we're interested in.
339
	 */
340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348
	if (measured_us > data->exit_us)
		measured_us -= data->exit_us;


	/* update our correction ratio */

	new_factor = data->correction_factor[data->bucket]
			* (DECAY - 1) / DECAY;

349
	if (data->expected_us > 0 && measured_us < MAX_INTERESTING)
350
		new_factor += RESOLUTION * measured_us / data->expected_us;
351
	else
352 353 354 355 356
		/*
		 * we were idle so long that we count it as a perfect
		 * prediction
		 */
		new_factor += RESOLUTION;
357

358 359 360 361 362 363
	/*
	 * We don't want 0 as factor; we always want at least
	 * a tiny bit of estimated time.
	 */
	if (new_factor == 0)
		new_factor = 1;
364

365
	data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = new_factor;
366 367 368 369 370

	/* update the repeating-pattern data */
	data->intervals[data->interval_ptr++] = last_idle_us;
	if (data->interval_ptr >= INTERVALS)
		data->interval_ptr = 0;
371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413
}

/**
 * menu_enable_device - scans a CPU's states and does setup
 * @dev: the CPU
 */
static int menu_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
	struct menu_device *data = &per_cpu(menu_devices, dev->cpu);

	memset(data, 0, sizeof(struct menu_device));

	return 0;
}

static struct cpuidle_governor menu_governor = {
	.name =		"menu",
	.rating =	20,
	.enable =	menu_enable_device,
	.select =	menu_select,
	.reflect =	menu_reflect,
	.owner =	THIS_MODULE,
};

/**
 * init_menu - initializes the governor
 */
static int __init init_menu(void)
{
	return cpuidle_register_governor(&menu_governor);
}

/**
 * exit_menu - exits the governor
 */
static void __exit exit_menu(void)
{
	cpuidle_unregister_governor(&menu_governor);
}

MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
module_init(init_menu);
module_exit(exit_menu);