Skip to content

Q
qemu

openeuler / qemu

通知 10
Star 0
Fork 0
Q
qemu
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 19 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 29 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • P
      ppc: Clean up includes · 0d75590d
      由 Peter Maydell 提交于 
      Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.

This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1453832250-766-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
      0d75590d
  7. 23 10月, 2015 2 次提交
    • D
      spapr_iommu: Provide a function to switch a TCE table to allowing VFIO · c10325d6
      由 David Gibson 提交于 
      Because of the way non-VFIO guest IOMMU operations are KVM accelerated, not
all TCE tables (guest IOMMU contexts) can support VFIO devices.  Currently,
this is decided at creation time.

To support hotplug of VFIO devices, we need to allow a TCE table which
previously didn't allow VFIO devices to be switched so that it can.  This
patch adds an spapr_tce_set_need_vfio() function to do this, by
reallocating the table in userspace if necessary.

Currently this doesn't allow the KVM acceleration to be re-enabled if all
the VFIO devices are removed.  That's an optimization for another time.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: NLaurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
      c10325d6
    • D
      spapr_iommu: Rename vfio_accel parameter · 6a81dd17
      由 David Gibson 提交于 
      The vfio_accel parameter used when creating a new TCE table (guest IOMMU
context) has a confusing name.  What it really means is whether we need the
TCE table created to be able to support VFIO devices.

VFIO is relevant, because when available we use in-kernel acceleration of
the TCE table, but that may not work with VFIO devices because updates to
the table are handled in kernel, bypass qemu and so don't hit qemu's
infrastructure for keeping the VFIO host IOMMU state in sync with the guest
IOMMU state.

Rename the parameter to "need_vfio" throughout.  This is a cosmetic change,
with no impact on the logic.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: NLaurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
      6a81dd17
  9. 07 7月, 2015 3 次提交
  11. 04 6月, 2015 6 次提交
  13. 09 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      spapr_vio/spapr_iommu: Move VIO bypass where it belongs · ee9a569a
      由 Alexey Kardashevskiy 提交于 
      Instead of tweaking a TCE table device by adding there a bypass flag,
let's add an alias to RAM and IOMMU memory region, and enable/disable
those according to the selected bypass mode.
This way IOMMU memory region can have size of the actual window rather
than ram_size which is essential for upcoming DDW support.

This moves bypass logic to VIO layer and keeps @bypass flag in TCE table
for migration compatibility only. This replaces spapr_tce_set_bypass()
calls with explicit assignment to avoid confusion as the function could
do something more that just syncing the @bypass flag.

This adds a pointer to VIO device into the sPAPRTCETable struct to provide
the sPAPRTCETable device a way to update bypass mode for the VIO device.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      ee9a569a
  15. 17 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 07 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      PPC: Fix crash on spapr_tce_table_finalize() · 5f9490de
      由 David Gibson 提交于 
      spapr_tce_table_finalize() can SEGV if the object was not previously
realized.  In particular this can be triggered by running
         qemu-system-ppc -device spapr-tce-table,?

The basic problem is that we have mismatched initialization versus
finalization: spapr_tce_table_finalize() is attempting to undo things that
are done in spapr_tce_table_realize(), not an instance_init function.

Therefore, replace spapr_tce_table_finalize() with
spapr_tce_table_unrealize().
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      5f9490de
  19. 29 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 15 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 27 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      spapr_iommu: Make in-kernel TCE table optional · 9bb62a07
      由 Alexey Kardashevskiy 提交于 
      POWER KVM supports an KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE capability which allows allocating
TCE tables in the host kernel memory and handle H_PUT_TCE requests
targeted to specific LIOBN (logical bus number) right in the host without
switching to QEMU. At the moment this is used for emulated devices only
and the handler only puts TCE to the table. If the in-kernel H_PUT_TCE
handler finds a LIOBN and corresponding table, it will put a TCE to
the table and complete hypercall execution. The user space will not be
notified.

Upcoming VFIO support is going to use the same sPAPRTCETable device class
so KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE is going to be used as well. That means that TCE
tables for VFIO are going to be allocated in the host as well.
However VFIO operates with real IOMMU tables and simple copying of
a TCE to the real hardware TCE table will not work as guest physical
to host physical address translation is requited.

So until the host kernel gets VFIO support for H_PUT_TCE, we better not
to register VFIO's TCE in the host.

This adds a place holder for KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_VFIO capability. It is not
in upstream yet and being discussed so now it is always false which means
that in-kernel VFIO acceleration is not supported.

This adds a bool @vfio_accel flag to the sPAPRTCETable device telling
that sPAPRTCETable should not try allocating TCE table in the host kernel
for VFIO. The flag is false now as at the moment there is no VFIO.

This adds an vfio_accel parameter to spapr_tce_new_table(), the semantic
is the same. Since there is only emulated PCI and VIO now, the flag is set
to false. Upcoming VFIO support will set it to true.

This is a preparation patch so no change in behaviour is expected
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      9bb62a07
  25. 16 6月, 2014 8 次提交
  27. 08 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  29. 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  31. 02 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  33. 29 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  35. 04 7月, 2013 2 次提交
  37. 20 6月, 2013 5 次提交