- 07 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
functions read_sync, drop_sync, write_sync, and also nbd_negotiate_write, nbd_negotiate_read, nbd_negotiate_drop_sync returns number of processed bytes. But what this number can be, except requested number of bytes? Actually, underlying nbd_wr_syncv function returns a value >= 0 and != requested_bytes only on eof on read operation. So, firstly, it is impossible on write (let's add an assert) and on read it actually means, that communication is broken (except nbd_receive_reply, see below). Most of callers operate like this: if (func(..., size) != size) { /* error path */ } , i.e.: 1. They are not interested in partial success 2. Extra duplications in code (especially bad are duplications of magic numbers) 3. User doesn't see actual error message, as return code is lost. (this patch doesn't fix this point, but it makes fixing easier) Several callers handles ret >= 0 and != requested-size separately, by just returning EINVAL in this case. This patch makes read_sync and friends return EINVAL in this case, so final behavior is the same. And only one caller - nbd_receive_reply() does something not so obvious. It returns EINVAL for ret > 0 and != requested-size, like previous group, but for ret == 0 it returns 0. The only caller of nbd_receive_reply() - nbd_read_reply_entry() handles ret == 0 in the same way as ret < 0, so for now it doesn't matter. However, in following commits error path handling will be improved and we'll need to distinguish success from fail in this case too. So, this patch adds separate helper for this case - read_sync_eof. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-Id: <20170516094533.6160-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Wolf 提交于
NBD can't cope with device size changes, so resize must be forbidden, but otherwise we can tolerate anything. Depending on whether the export is writable or not, we only require consistent reads and writes. Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Acked-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
-
由 Kevin Wolf 提交于
Now that blk_insert_bs() requests the BlockBackend permissions for the node it attaches to, it can fail. Instead of aborting, pass the errors to the callers. Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Acked-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
-
由 Kevin Wolf 提交于
We want every user to be specific about the permissions it needs, so we'll pass the initial permissions as parameters to blk_new(). A user only needs to call blk_set_perm() if it wants to change the permissions after the fact. The permissions are stored in the BlockBackend and applied whenever a BlockDriverState should be attached in blk_insert_bs(). This does not include actually choosing the right set of permissions everywhere yet. Instead, the usual FIXME comment is added to each place and will be addressed in individual patches. Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Acked-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paolo Bonzini 提交于
In the client, read the reply headers from a coroutine, switching the read side between the "read header" coroutine and the I/O coroutine that reads the body of the reply. In the server, if the server can read more requests it will create a new "read request" coroutine as soon as a request has been read. Otherwise, the new coroutine is created in nbd_request_put. Reviewed-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170213135235.12274-8-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Hajnoczi 提交于
The new AioPollFn io_poll() argument to aio_set_fd_handler() and aio_set_event_handler() is used in the next patch. Keep this code change separate due to the number of files it touches. Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-id: 20161201192652.9509-3-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
-
- 02 11月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Upstream NBD protocol recently added the ability to efficiently write zeroes without having to send the zeroes over the wire, along with a flag to control whether the client wants to allow a hole. Note that when it comes to requiring full allocation, vs. permitting optimizations, the NBD spec intentionally picked a different sense for the flag; the rules in qemu are: MAY_UNMAP == 0: must write zeroes MAY_UNMAP == 1: may use holes if reads will see zeroes while in NBD, the rules are: FLAG_NO_HOLE == 1: must write zeroes FLAG_NO_HOLE == 0: may use holes if reads will see zeroes In all cases, the 'may use holes' scenario is optional (the server need not use a hole, and must not use a hole if subsequent reads would not see zeroes). Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-16-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
NBD commit 6d34500b clarified how clients and servers are supposed to behave before closing a connection. It added NBD_REP_ERR_SHUTDOWN (for the server to announce it is about to go away during option haggling, so the client should quit sending NBD_OPT_* other than NBD_OPT_ABORT) and ESHUTDOWN (for the server to announce it is about to go away during transmission, so the client should quit sending NBD_CMD_* other than NBD_CMD_DISC). It also clarified that NBD_OPT_ABORT gets a reply, while NBD_CMD_DISC does not. This patch merely adds the missing reply to NBD_OPT_ABORT and teaches the client to recognize server errors. Actually teaching the server to send NBD_REP_ERR_SHUTDOWN or ESHUTDOWN would require knowing that the server has been requested to shut down soon (maybe we could do that by installing a SIGINT handler in qemu-nbd, which transitions from RUNNING to a new state that waits for the client to react, rather than just out-right quitting - but that's a bigger task for another day). Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-15-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Move dummy ESHUTDOWN to include/qemu/osdep.h. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
The NBD Protocol allows the server and client to mutually agree on a shorter handshake (omit the 124 bytes of reserved 0), via the server advertising NBD_FLAG_NO_ZEROES and the client acknowledging with NBD_FLAG_C_NO_ZEROES (only possible in newstyle, whether or not it is fixed newstyle). It doesn't shave much off the wire, but we might as well implement it. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-13-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
The NBD Protocol allows us to send human-readable messages along with any NBD_REP_ERR error during option negotiation; make use of this fact for clients that know what to do with our message. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-8-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Rather than open-coding NBD_REP_SERVER, reuse the code we already have by adding a length parameter. Additionally, the refactoring will make adding NBD_OPT_GO in a later patch easier. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-7-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Our coding convention prefers CamelCase names, and we already have other existing structs with NBDFoo naming. Let's be consistent, before later patches add even more structs. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
We have both 'struct NBDRequest' and 'struct nbd_request'; making it confusing to see which does what. Furthermore, we want to rename nbd_request to align with our normal CamelCase naming conventions. So, rename the struct which is used to associate the data received during request callbacks, while leaving the shorter name for the description of the request sent over the wire in the NBD protocol. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-4-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Current upstream NBD documents that requests have a 16-bit flags, followed by a 16-bit type integer; although older versions mentioned only a 32-bit field with masking to find flags. Since the protocol is in network order (big-endian over the wire), the ABI is unchanged; but dealing with the flags as a separate field rather than masking will make it easier to add support for upcoming NBD extensions that increase the number of both flags and commands. Improve some comments in nbd.h based on the current upstream NBD protocol (https://github.com/yoe/nbd/blob/master/doc/proto.md), and touch some nearby code to keep checkpatch.pl happy. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-3-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
The NBD protocol allows servers to advertise a human-readable description alongside an export name during NBD_OPT_LIST. Add an option to pass through the user's string to the NBD client. Doing this also makes it easier to test commit 200650d4, which is the client counterpart of receiving the description. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1476469998-28592-2-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 27 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel P. Berrange 提交于
Ensure that all I/O channels created for NBD are given names to distinguish their respective roles. Acked-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
-
- 06 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Wolf 提交于
The builtin NBD server uses its own BlockBackend now instead of reusing the monitor/guest device one. This means that it has its own writethrough setting now. The builtin NBD server always uses writeback caching now regardless of whether the guest device has WCE enabled. qemu-nbd respects the cache mode given on the command line. We still need to keep a reference to the monitor BB because we put an eject notifier on it, but we don't use it for any I/O. Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Rather than asserting that nbdflags is within range, just give it the correct type to begin with :) nbdflags corresponds to the per-export portion of NBD Protocol "transmission flags", which is 16 bits in response to NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME and NBD_OPT_GO. Furthermore, upstream NBD has never passed the global flags to the kernel via ioctl(NBD_SET_FLAGS) (the ioctl was first introduced in NBD 2.9.22; then a latent bug in NBD 3.1 actually tried to OR the global flags with the transmission flags, with the disaster that the addition of NBD_FLAG_NO_ZEROES in 3.9 caused all earlier NBD 3.x clients to treat every export as read-only; NBD 3.10 and later intentionally clip things to 16 bits to pass only transmission flags). Qemu should follow suit, since the current two global flags (NBD_FLAG_FIXED_NEWSTYLE and NBD_FLAG_NO_ZEROES) have no impact on the kernel's behavior during transmission. CC: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1469129688-22848-3-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Commit ab7c548e added a check for invalid flags, but used an early return on error instead of properly going through the cleanup label. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1469129688-22848-2-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Change sector-based blk_discard(), blk_co_discard(), and blk_aio_discard() to instead be byte-based blk_pdiscard(), blk_co_pdiscard(), and blk_aio_pdiscard(). NBD gets a lot simpler now that ignoring the unaligned portion of a byte-based discard request is handled under the hood by the block layer. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Message-id: 1468624988-423-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
-
- 13 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paolo Bonzini 提交于
In practice the entry argument is always known at creation time, and it is confusing that sometimes qemu_coroutine_enter is used with a non-NULL argument to re-enter a coroutine (this happens in block/sheepdog.c and tests/test-coroutine.c). So pass the opaque value at creation time, for consistency with e.g. aio_bh_new. Mostly done with the following semantic patch: @ entry1 @ expression entry, arg, co; @@ - co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry); + co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg); ... - qemu_coroutine_enter(co, arg); + qemu_coroutine_enter(co); @ entry2 @ expression entry, arg; identifier co; @@ - Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry); + Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg); ... - qemu_coroutine_enter(co, arg); + qemu_coroutine_enter(co); @ entry3 @ expression entry, arg; @@ - qemu_coroutine_enter(qemu_coroutine_create(entry), arg); + qemu_coroutine_enter(qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg)); @ reentry @ expression co; @@ - qemu_coroutine_enter(co, NULL); + qemu_coroutine_enter(co); except for the aforementioned few places where the semantic patch stumbled (as expected) and for test_co_queue, which would otherwise produce an uninitialized variable warning. Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
-
- 17 6月, 2016 8 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Declare a constant and use that when determining if an export name fits within the constraints we are willing to support. Note that upstream NBD recently documented that clients MUST support export names of 256 bytes (not including trailing NUL), and SHOULD support names up to 4096 bytes. 4096 is a bit big (we would lose benefits of stack-allocation of a name array), and we already have other limits in place (for example, qcow2 snapshot names are clamped around 1024). So for now, just stick to the required minimum, as that's easier to audit than a full-scale support for larger names. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1463006384-7734-12-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
NBD ioctl()s are used to manage an NBD client session where initial handshake is done in userspace, but then the transmission phase is handed off to the kernel through a /dev/nbdX device. As such, all ioctls sent to the kernel on the /dev/nbdX fd belong in client.c; nbd_disconnect() was out-of-place in server.c. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1463006384-7734-7-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
The NBD protocol says that clients should not send a command flag that has not been negotiated (whether by the client requesting an option during a handshake, or because we advertise support for the flag in response to NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME), and that servers should reject invalid flags with EINVAL. We were silently ignoring the flags instead. The client can't rely on our behavior, since it is their fault for passing the bad flag in the first place, but it's better to be robust up front than to possibly behave differently than the client was expecting with the attempted flag. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> Message-Id: <1463006384-7734-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
We have a few bugs in how we handle invalid client commands: - A client can send an NBD_CMD_DISC where from + len overflows, convincing us to reply with an error and stay connected, even though the protocol requires us to silently disconnect. Fix by hoisting the special case sooner. - A client can send an NBD_CMD_WRITE where from + len overflows, where we reply to the client with EINVAL without consuming the payload; this will normally cause us to fail if the next thing read is not the right magic, but in rare cases, could cause us to interpret the data payload as valid commands and do things not requested by the client. Fix by adding a complete flag to track whether we are in sync or must disconnect. Furthermore, we have split the checks for bogus from/len across two functions, when it is easier to do it all at once. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1463006384-7734-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
We should never ignore failure from nbd_negotiate_send_rep(); if we are unable to write to the client, then it is not worth trying to continue the negotiation. Fortunately, the problem is not too severe - chances are that the errors being ignored here (mainly inability to write the reply to the client) are indications of a closed connection or something similar, which will also affect the next attempt to interact with the client and eventually reach a point where the errors are detected to end the loop. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1463006384-7734-4-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Clean up some debug message oddities missed earlier; this includes some typos, and recognizing that %d is not necessarily compatible with uint32_t. Also add a couple messages that I found useful while debugging things. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1463006384-7734-3-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Do not use PRIx16, clang complains. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Rather than always flushing ourselves, let the block layer forward the FUA on to the underlying device - where all underlying layers also understand FUA, we are now more efficient; and where any underlying layer doesn't understand it, now the block layer takes care of the full flush fallback on our behalf. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1463006384-7734-2-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Peter Maydell 提交于
The *_to_cpup() functions are not very useful, as they simply do a pointer dereference and then a *_to_cpu(). Instead use either: * ld*_*_p(), if the data is at an address that might not be correctly aligned for the load * a local dereference and *_to_cpu(), if the pointer is the correct type and known to be correctly aligned Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-Id: <1465570836-22211-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Similar to commit df7b97ff, we are mishandling clients that give an unaligned NBD_CMD_TRIM request, and potentially trimming bytes that occur before their request; which in turn can cause potential unintended data loss (unlikely in practice, since most clients are sane and issue aligned trim requests). However, while we fixed read and write by switching to the byte interfaces of blk_, we don't yet have a byte interface for discard. On the other hand, trim is advisory, so rounding the user's request to simply ignore the first and last unaligned sectors (or the entire request, if it is sub-sector in length) is just fine. CC: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1464173965-9694-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 12 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
We have several block drivers that understand BDRV_REQ_FUA, and emulate it in the block layer for the rest by a full flush. But without a way to actually request BDRV_REQ_FUA during a pass-through blk_pwrite(), FUA-aware block drivers like NBD are forced to repeat the emulation logic of a full flush regardless of whether the backend they are writing to could do it more efficiently. This patch just wires up a flags argument; followup patches will actually make use of it in the NBD driver and in qemu-io. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
-
- 22 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
The NBD protocol does not (yet) force any alignment constraints on clients. Even though qemu NBD clients always send requests that are aligned to 512 bytes, we must be prepared for non-qemu clients that don't care about alignment (even if it means they are less efficient). Our use of blk_read() and blk_write() was silently operating on the wrong file offsets when the client made an unaligned request, corrupting the client's data (but as the client already has control over the file we are serving, I don't think it is a security hole, per se, just a data corruption bug). Note that in the case of NBD_CMD_READ, an unaligned length could cause us to return up to 511 bytes of uninitialized trailing garbage from blk_try_blockalign() - hopefully nothing sensitive from the heap's prior usage is ever leaked in that manner. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Tested-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-id: 1461249750-31928-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
-
- 15 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Upstream NBD documents (as of commit 4feebc95) that servers MAY choose to operate in a conditional mode, where it is up to the client whether to use TLS. For qemu's case, we want to always be in FORCEDTLS mode, because of the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks, and since we never export more than one device; likewise, the qemu client will ALWAYS send NBD_OPT_STARTTLS as its first option. But now that SELECTIVETLS servers exist, it is feasible to encounter a (non-qemu) client that is programmed to talk to such a server, and does not do NBD_OPT_STARTTLS first, but rather wants to probe if it can use a non-encrypted export. The NBD protocol documents that we should let such a client continue trying, on the grounds that maybe the client will get the hint to send NBD_OPT_STARTTLS, rather than immediately dropping the connection. Note that NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME is a special case: since it is the only option request that can't have an error return, we have to (continue to) drop the connection on that one; rather, what we are fixing here is that all other replies prior to TLS initiation tell the client NBD_REP_ERR_TLS_REQD, but keep the connection alive. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-id: 1460671343-18485-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
-
- 08 4月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
nbd-server.c currently fails to handle unsupported options properly. If during option haggling the client sends an unknown request, the server kills the connection instead of letting the client try to fall back to something older. This is precisely what advertising NBD_FLAG_FIXED_NEWSTYLE was supposed to fix. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1459982918-32229-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Print debug tracing messages while data is still in native ordering, rather than after we've potentially swapped it into network order for transmission. Also, it's nice if the server mentions what it is replying, to correlate it to with what the client says it is receiving. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1459913704-19949-4-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
The NBD Protocol requires that servers should send EPERM for attempts to write (or trim) a read-only export. We were correct for TRIM (blk_co_discard() gave EPERM); but were manually setting EROFS which then got mapped to EINVAL over the wire on writes. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1459913704-19949-2-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Commit 57cb38b3 included qapi/error.h into qemu/osdep.h to get the Error typedef. Since then, we've moved to include qemu/osdep.h everywhere. Its file comment explains: "To avoid getting into possible circular include dependencies, this file should not include any other QEMU headers, with the exceptions of config-host.h, compiler.h, os-posix.h and os-win32.h, all of which are doing a similar job to this file and are under similar constraints." qapi/error.h doesn't do a similar job, and it doesn't adhere to similar constraints: it includes qapi-types.h. That's in excess of 100KiB of crap most .c files don't actually need. Add the typedef to qemu/typedefs.h, and include that instead of qapi/error.h. Include qapi/error.h in .c files that need it and don't get it now. Include qapi-types.h in qom/object.h for uint16List. Update scripts/clean-includes accordingly. Update it further to match reality: replace config.h by config-target.h, add sysemu/os-posix.h, sysemu/os-win32.h. Update the list of includes in the qemu/osdep.h comment quoted above similarly. This reduces the number of objects depending on qapi/error.h from "all of them" to less than a third. Unfortunately, the number depending on qapi-types.h shrinks only a little. More work is needed for that one. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Fix compilation without the spice devel packages. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel P. Berrange 提交于
This extends the NBD protocol handling code so that it is capable of negotiating TLS support during the connection setup. This involves requesting the STARTTLS protocol option before any other NBD options. Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1455129674-17255-14-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Daniel P. Berrange 提交于
If the user does not provide an export name and the server is running the new style protocol, where export names are mandatory, use "" as the default export name if the user has not specified any. "" is defined in the NBD protocol as the default name to use in such scenarios. Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1455129674-17255-13-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
由 Daniel P. Berrange 提交于
With the new style protocol, the NBD client will currenetly send NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME as the first (and indeed only) option it wants. The problem is that the NBD protocol spec does not allow for returning an error message with the NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME option. So if the server mandates use of TLS, the client will simply see an immediate connection close after issuing NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME which is not user friendly. To improve this situation, if we have the fixed new style protocol, we can sent NBD_OPT_LIST as the first option to query the list of server exports. We can check for our named export in this list and raise an error if it is not found, instead of going ahead and sending NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME with a name that we know will be rejected. This improves the error reporting both in the case that the server required TLS, and in the case that the client requested export name does not exist on the server. If the server does not support NBD_OPT_LIST, we just ignore that and carry on with NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME as before. Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1455129674-17255-12-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-