is_zero_cluster() and is_zero_cluster_top_locked() are used only
by qcow2_co_write_zeroes().  The former is too broad (we don't
care if the sectors we are about to overwrite are non-zero, only
that all other sectors in the cluster are zero), so it needs to
be called up to twice but with smaller limits - rename it along
with adding the neeeded parameter.  The latter can be inlined for
more compact code.

The testsuite change shows that we now have a sparser top file
when an unaligned write_zeroes overwrites the only portion of
the backing file with data.

Based on a patch proposal by Denis V. Lunev.

CC: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

This patch follows guidelines of all other tracepoints in qcow2, like ones
in qcow2_co_writev. I think that they should dump values in the same
quantities or be changed all together.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1463476543-3087-4-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
[eblake: typo fix in commit message]
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Unaligned requests will occupy only one cluster. This is true since the
previous commit. Simplify the code taking this consideration into
account.

In other words, the caller is now buggy if it ever passes us an unaligned
request that crosses cluster boundaries (the only requests that can cross
boundaries will be aligned).

There are no other changes so far.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1463476543-3087-3-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

We should split requests even if they are less than write_zeroes_alignment.
For example we can have the following request:
  offset 62k
  size   4k
  write_zeroes_alignment 64k
The original code sent 1 request covering 2 qcow2 clusters, and resulted
in both clusters being allocated. But by splitting the request, we can
cater to the case where one of the two clusters can be zeroed as a
whole, for only 1 cluster allocated after the operation.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1463476543-3087-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>

[eblake: Avoid exceeding nb_sectors, hoist alignment checks out of
loop, and update testsuite to show that patch works]
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Replace (((n) + (d) - 1) /(d)) by DIV_ROUND_UP(n,d).

This patch is the result of coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/round.cocci

CC: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Replace (((n) + (d) - 1) /(d)) by DIV_ROUND_UP(n,d).

This patch is the result of coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/round.cocci

CC: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Replace (((n) + (d) - 1) /(d)) by DIV_ROUND_UP(n,d).

This patch is the result of coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/round.cocci

CC: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Replace (((n) + (d) - 1) /(d)) by DIV_ROUND_UP(n,d).

This patch is the result of coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/round.cocci

CC: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Remove glib.h includes, as it is provided by osdep.h.

This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Similar to the "!drv || !drv->bdrv_aio_ioctl" case above, here it is
okay to set co.ret and return. As pointed out by Paolo, a BH will be
created as necessary by the caller (bdrv_co_maybe_schedule_bh).
Besides, as pointed out by Kevin, "data" was leaked before.
Reported-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20160601015223.19277-1-famz@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

I was thrown by the fact that the public type BlockRequest had
an anonymous union, but no obvious discriminator.  Turns out
that the only client of the second branch of the union was code
internal to io.c, now that commit 91c6e4b7 killed public
multiwrite, so move it into io.c and improve the comments.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1463699150-19445-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

in a read-modify-write cycle a small request might cause
head and tail to fall into the same aligned block. Currently
QEMU reads the same block twice in this case which is
not necessary.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Message-id: 1464607873-28206-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de
Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1464599852-15392-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

at least in the path via virtio-blk the maximum size is not
restricted.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: NPeter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Message-Id: <1464080368-29584-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

This changes the commit block job to use the job's BlockBackend for
performing its I/O. job->bs isn't used by the commit code any more
afterwards.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

This changes the backup block job to use the job's BlockBackend for
performing its I/O. job->bs isn't used by the backup code any more
afterwards.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

Now that we pass the job to the function, bs is implied by that.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>

Instead of relying on peeking at bs->job, we want to explicitly get
a reference to the job that was involved in this notifier callback.

Pack the Notifier inside of the BackupBlockJob so we can use
container_of to get a reference back to the BackupBlockJob object.

This cuts out one more case where we rely unnecessarily on bs->job.
Suggested-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>

This changes the mirror block job to use the job's BlockBackend for
performing its I/O. job->bs isn't used by the mirroring code any more
afterwards.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

We had to forbid mirroring to a target BDS that already had a BB
attached because the node swapping at job completion would add a second
BB and we didn't support multiple BBs on a single BDS at the time. Now
we do, so we can lift the restriction.

As we allow additional BlockBackends for the target, we must expect
other users to be sending requests. There may no requests be in flight
during the graph modification, so we have to drain those users now.

The core part of this patch is a revert of commit 40365552.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

This changes the streaming block job to use the job's BlockBackend for
performing the COR reads. job->bs isn't used by the streaming code any
more afterwards.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

Also add trace points now that the function can be directly called.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>

This adds a new BlockBackend field to the BlockJob struct, which
coexists with the BlockDriverState while converting the individual jobs.

When creating a block job, a new BlockBackend is created on top of the
given BlockDriverState, and it is destroyed when the BlockJob ends. The
reference to the BDS is now held by the BlockBackend instead of calling
bdrv_ref/unref manually.

We have to be careful when we use bdrv_replace_in_backing_chain() in
block jobs because this changes the BDS that job->blk points to. At the
moment block jobs are too tightly coupled with their BDS, so that moving
a job to another BDS isn't easily possible; therefore, we need to just
manually undo this change afterwards.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

The existing users of the function are:

1. blk_new_open(), which already enabled the write cache
2. Some test cases that don't care about the setting
3. blockdev_init() for empty drives, where the cache mode is overridden
   with the value from the options when a medium is inserted

Therefore, this patch doesn't change the current behaviour. It will be
convenient, however, for additional users of blk_new() (like block
jobs) if the most sensible WCE setting is the default.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>

Commit 983a1600 changed the semantics of blk_write_zeroes() to
be byte-based rather than sector-based, but did not change the
name, which is an open invitation for other code to misuse the
function.  Renaming to pwrite_zeroes() makes it more in line
with other byte-based interfaces, and will help make it easier
to track which remaining write_zeroes interfaces still need
conversion.
Reported-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

When changing the BlockDriverState that a BdrvChild points to while the
node is currently drained, we must call the .drained_end() parent
callback. Conversely, when this means attaching a new node that is
already drained, we need to call .drained_begin().

bdrv_root_attach_child() takes now an opaque parameter, which is needed
because the callbacks must also be called if we're attaching a new child
to the BlockBackend when the root node is already drained, and they need
a way to identify the BlockBackend. Previously, child->opaque was set
too late and the callbacks would still see it as NULL.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

Until now, bdrv_drained_begin() used bdrv_drain() internally to drain
the queue. This is kind of backwards and caused quiescing code to be
duplicated because bdrv_drained_begin() had to ensure that no new
requests come in even after bdrv_drain() returns, whereas bdrv_drain()
had to have them because it could be called from other places.

Instead move the bdrv_drain() code to bdrv_drained_begin() and make
bdrv_drain() a simple wrapper around bdrv_drained_begin/end().
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

blk_new() cannot fail so its Error ** parameter has become superfluous.
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

There are no callers to bdrv_open() or bdrv_open_inherit() left that
pass a pointer to a non-NULL BDS pointer as the first argument of these
functions, so we can finally drop that parameter and just make them
return the new BDS.

Generally, the following pattern is applied:

    bs = NULL;
    ret = bdrv_open(&bs, ..., &local_err);
    if (ret < 0) {
        error_propagate(errp, local_err);
        ...
    }

by

    bs = bdrv_open(..., errp);
    if (!bs) {
        ret = -EINVAL;
        ...
    }

Of course, there are only a few instances where the pattern is really
pure.
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Its only caller is blk_new_open(), so we can just inline it there.

The bdrv_new_root() call is dropped in the process because we can just
let bdrv_open() create the BDS.
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

The bdrv_next() users all leaked the BdrvNextIterator after completing
the iteration. Simply changing bdrv_next() to free the iterator before
returning NULL at the end of list doesn't work because some callers exit
the loop before looking at all BDSes.

This patch moves the BdrvNextIterator from the heap to the stack of
the caller and switches to a bdrv_first()/bdrv_next() interface for
initialising the iterator.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NVadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

In order to correctly check whether a given cluster is read as zero, we
don't only need to check whether bdrv_get_block_status_above() sets
BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO, but also if all sectors for the whole cluster have the
same status.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>

We should check for (res & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO) only. The situation when we
will have !(res & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA) and will not have BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO is
not possible for images with bdi.unallocated_blocks_are_zero == true.

For those images where it's false, however, it can happen and we must
not consider the data zeroed then or we would corrupt the image.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

Instead of propagating any change of a BDS's AioContext only to its file
and backing children and letting driver-specific code do the rest, just
propagate it to all and drop the thus superfluous implementations of
bdrv_{at,de}tach_aio_context() in Quorum, blkverify and VMDK.
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

This patch removes the remaining users of bs->blk, which will allow us
to have multiple BBs on top of a single BDS. In the meantime, all checks
that are currently in place to prevent the user from creating such
setups can be switched to bdrv_has_blk() instead of accessing BDS.blk.

Future patches can allow them and e.g. enable users to mirror to a block
device that already has a BlockBackend on it.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

query-named-block-nodes should not return information that is related
to the attached BlockBackend rather than the node itself, so throttling
information needs to be removed from it.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

We need to introduce a separate BdrvNextIterator struct that can keep
more state than just the current BDS in order to avoid using the bs->blk
pointer.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

In many cases we just want to know whether a BDS has at least one BB
attached, without needing to know the exact BB that is attached. In
contrast to bs->blk, this is still a valid question when more than one
BB can be attached, so just answer it by checking the parents list.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>