1. 30 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 21 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 12 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • B
      Fix sys-queue.h conflict for good · 72cf2d4f
      Blue Swirl 提交于
      Problem: Our file sys-queue.h is a copy of the BSD file, but there are
      some additions and it's not entirely compatible. Because of that, there have
      been conflicts with system headers on BSD systems. Some hacks have been
      introduced in the commits 15cc9235,
      f40d7537,
      96555a96 and
      3990d09a but the fixes were fragile.
      
      Solution: Avoid the conflict entirely by renaming the functions and the
      file. Revert the previous hacks.
      Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
      72cf2d4f
  4. 11 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  5. 04 9月, 2009 19 次提交
  6. 31 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 28 8月, 2009 4 次提交
  8. 24 8月, 2009 2 次提交
    • A
      Unbreak large mem support by removing kqemu · 4a1418e0
      Anthony Liguori 提交于
      kqemu introduces a number of restrictions on the i386 target.  The worst is that
      it prevents large memory from working in the default build.
      
      Furthermore, kqemu is fundamentally flawed in a number of ways.  It relies on
      the TSC as a time source which will not be reliable on a multiple processor
      system in userspace.  Since most modern processors are multicore, this severely
      limits the utility of kqemu.
      
      kvm is a viable alternative for people looking to accelerate qemu and has the
      benefit of being supported by the upstream Linux kernel.  If someone can
      implement work arounds to remove the restrictions introduced by kqemu, I'm
      happy to avoid and/or revert this patch.
      
      N.B. kqemu will still function in the 0.11 series but this patch removes it from
      the 0.12 series.
      
      Paul, please Ack or Nack this patch.
      Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
      4a1418e0
    • B
      Fix device name completion for 'eject' · 2a1704a7
      Blue Swirl 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
      2a1704a7
  9. 11 8月, 2009 2 次提交
  10. 01 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 30 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 28 7月, 2009 1 次提交
    • G
      kill drives_table · 751c6a17
      Gerd Hoffmann 提交于
      First step cleaning up the drives handling.  This one does nothing but
      removing drives_table[], still it became seriously big.
      
      drive_get_index() is gone and is replaced by drives_get() which hands
      out DriveInfo pointers instead of a table index.  This needs adaption in
      *tons* of places all over.
      
      The drives are now maintained as linked list.
      Signed-off-by: NGerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
      751c6a17
  13. 27 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  14. 17 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 16 7月, 2009 1 次提交