- 03 3月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
The include directive permits modular QAPI schemata, but the generated code is monolithic all the same. To permit generating modular code, the front end needs to pass more information on inclusions to the back ends. The commit before last added the necessary information to the parse tree. This commit adds it to the intermediate representation and its QAPISchemaVisitor. A later commit will use this to to generate modular code. New entity QAPISchemaInclude represents inclusions. Call new visitor method visit_include() for it, so visitors can see the sub-modules a module includes. Note that unlike other entities, QAPISchemaInclude has no name, and is therefore not added to entity_dict. New QAPISchemaEntity attribute @module names the entity's source file. Call new visitor method visit_module() when it changes during a visit, so visitors can keep track of the module being visited. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-18-armbru@redhat.com> [eblake: avoid accidental deletion of self._predefining] Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
The generators' conversion to visitors (merge commit 9e72681d) changed the processing order of entities from source order to alphabetical order. The next commit needs source order, so change it back. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-17-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMichael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-14-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMichael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Error messages print absolute file names of included files even if the user gave a relative one on the command line: $ PYTHONPATH=scripts python -B tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py tests/qapi-schema/include-cycle.json In file included from tests/qapi-schema/include-cycle.json:1: In file included from /work/armbru/qemu/tests/qapi-schema/include-cycle-b.json:1: /work/armbru/qemu/tests/qapi-schema/include-cycle-c.json:1: Inclusion loop for include-cycle.json Improve this to In file included from tests/qapi-schema/include-cycle.json:1: In file included from tests/qapi-schema/include-cycle-b.json:1: tests/qapi-schema/include-cycle-c.json:1: Inclusion loop for include-cycle.json The error message when an include file can't be opened prints the include directive's file name, which is relative to the including file. Change this to print the file name relative to the working directory. Visible in tests/qapi-schema/include-no-file.err. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-12-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMichael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Whenever qapi-schema.json changes, we run six programs eleven times to update eleven files. Similar for qga/qapi-schema.json. This is silly. Replace the six programs by a single program that spits out all eleven files. The programs become modules in new Python package qapi, along with the helper library. This requires moving them to scripts/qapi/. While moving them, consistently drop executable mode bits. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-9-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMichael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [eblake: move change to one-line 'blurb' earlier in series, mention mode bit change as intentional, update qapi-code-gen.txt to match actual generated events.c file] Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Every generator has separate boilerplate for .h and .c, and their differences are boring. All of them repeat the license note. Reduce the repetition as follows. Move common text like the license note to common open_output(), next to the existing common text there. For each generator, replace the two separate descriptions by a single one. While there, emit an "automatically generated" note into generated documentation, too. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180211093607.27351-3-armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel P. Berrange 提交于
The iteritems()/itervalues() methods are gone in py3, but the items()/values() methods are still around. The latter are less efficient than the former in py2, but this has unmeasurably small impact on QEMU build time, so taking portability over efficiency is a net win. Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180116134217.8725-3-berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
-
由 Daniel P. Berrange 提交于
Python 3 no longer supports the bare "print" statement, it must be called as a normal function with round brackets. It is possible to opt-in to this new syntax with Python 2.6 onwards by importing the "print_function" from the "__future__" module, making it easy to support Python 2 and 3 in parallel. Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180116134217.8725-2-berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
-
- 21 12月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Use a string instead of a list of strings. While there, generate fewer superfluous blank lines. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-10-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Use a string instead of a list of strings. This makes qapi2texi.py generate additional blank lines. They're harmless, and the next commit will get rid of them again. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-9-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
We have two representations of sections without a name: the main section uses name=None, the others name=''. Standardize on name=None. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-8-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
A negative test case crept into doc-good.json: invalid use of section markup we currently fail to reject. Move this into its own doc-bad-section.json. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171002141341.24616-6-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eduardo Habkost 提交于
The conflict check added by commit c0644771 ("qapi: Reject alternates that can't work with keyval_parse()") doesn't work with the following declaration: { 'alternate': 'Alt', 'data': { 'one': 'bool', 'two': 'str' } } It crashes with: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./scripts/qapi-types.py", line 295, in <module> schema = QAPISchema(input_file) File "/home/ehabkost/rh/proj/virt/qemu/scripts/qapi.py", line 1468, in __init__ self.exprs = check_exprs(parser.exprs) File "/home/ehabkost/rh/proj/virt/qemu/scripts/qapi.py", line 958, in check_exprs check_alternate(expr, info) File "/home/ehabkost/rh/proj/virt/qemu/scripts/qapi.py", line 830, in check_alternate % (name, key, types_seen[qtype])) KeyError: 'QTYPE_QSTRING' This happens because the previously-seen conflicting member ('one') can't be found at types_seen[qtype], but at types_seen['QTYPE_BOOL']. Fix the bug by moving the error check to the same loop that adds new items to types_seen, raising an exception if types_seen[qt] is already set. Add two additional test cases that can detect the bug. Signed-off-by: NEduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170717180926.14924-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
I expect the 'null' type to be useful mostly for members of alternate types. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc-André Lureau 提交于
We would like to use a same QObject type to represent numbers, whether they are int, uint, or floats. Getters will allow some compatibility between the various types if the number fits other representations. Add a few more tests while at it. Signed-off-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170607163635.17635-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [parse_stats_intervals() simplified a bit, comment in test_visitor_in_int_overflow() tidied up, suppress bogus warnings] Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc-André Lureau 提交于
Alternates with both a 'number' and an 'int' branch will become invalid when the next patch merges of QFloat and QInt into QNum. More sophisticated alternate code could keep them valid, but since we have no users outside tests, simply drop the tests. Signed-off-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170607163635.17635-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
-
- 31 5月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Alternates are sum types like unions, but use the JSON type on the wire / QType in QObject instead of an explicit tag. That's why we require alternate members to have distinct QTypes. The recently introduced keyval_parse() (commit d454dbe0) can only produce string scalars. The qobject_input_visitor_new_keyval() input visitor mostly hides the difference, so code using a QObject input visitor doesn't have to care whether its input was parsed from JSON or KEY=VALUE,... The difference leaks for alternates, as noted in commit 0ee9ae7c: a non-string, non-enum scalar alternate value can't currently be expressed. In part, this is just our insufficiently sophisticated implementation. Consider alternate type 'GuestFileWhence'. It has an integer member and a 'QGASeek' member. The latter is an enumeration with values 'set', 'cur', 'end'. The meaning of b=set, b=cur, b=end, b=0, b=1 and so forth is perfectly obvious. However, our current implementation falls apart at run time for b=0, b=1, and so forth. Fixable, but not today; add a test case and a TODO comment. Now consider an alternate type with a string and an integer member. What's the meaning of a=42? Is it the string "42" or the integer 42? Whichever meaning you pick makes the other inexpressible. This isn't just an implementation problem, it's fundamental. Our current implementation will pick string. So far, we haven't needed such alternates. To make sure we stop and think before we add one that cannot sanely work with keyval_parse(), let's require alternate members to have sufficiently distinct representation in KEY=VALUE,... syntax: * A string member clashes with any other scalar member * An enumeration member clashes with bool members when it has value 'on' or 'off'. * An enumeration member clashes with numeric members when it has a value that starts with '-', '+', or a decimal digit. This is a rather lazy approximation of the actual number syntax accepted by the visitor. Note that enumeration values starting with '-' and '+' are rejected elsewhere already, but better safe than sorry. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1495471335-23707-5-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
The next commit is going to make alternate members of type 'str' conflict with other scalar types. Would break a few test cases that don't actually require 'str'. Flip them from 'str' to 'bool' or 'EnumOne'. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1495471335-23707-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
- 21 3月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1490015515-25851-7-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
We have a number of negative tests, but we don't have systematic positive coverage. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1490015515-25851-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
test-qapi.py used to print the internal representation of doc comments (commit 3313b612). This went away when we dropped the doc comments in positive tests (commit 87c16dce). Bring it back, because I'm going to add real positive doc comment tests. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1490015515-25851-5-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
-
- 16 3月, 2017 16 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
When choking on a token where an expression is expected, we report 'Expected "{", "[" or string'. Close, but no cigar. Fix it to Expected '"{", "[", string, boolean or "null"'. Missed in commit e53188ad. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-48-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
check_definition_doc() checks for member documentation without a matching member. It laboriously second-guesses what members QAPISchema._def_exprs() will create. That's a stupid game. Move the check into QAPISchema.check(), where the members are known. Delegate the actual checking to new QAPIDoc.check(). Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-38-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
New test doc-bad-union-member.json shows we can fail to reject documentation for nonexistent members. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-37-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-36-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Results in a more precise error location, but the real reason is emptying out check_docs() step by step. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-35-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-34-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Move the check whether the doc matches the expression name from check_definition_doc() to check_exprs(). This changes the error location from the comment to the expression. Makes sense as the message talks about the expression: "Definition of '%s' follows documentation for '%s'". It's also a step towards getting rid of check_docs(). Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-33-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
This fixes the errors uncovered by the previous commit. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-32-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
New tests doc-before-include.json and doc-before-pragma.json show we fail to reject a misplaced expression comment. New test doc-no-symbol.json shows a bad error message. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-31-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
We traditionally mark optional members #optional in the doc comment. Before commit 3313b612, this was entirely manual. Commit 3313b612 added some automation because its qapi2texi.py relied on #optional to determine whether a member is optional. This is no longer the case since the previous commit: the only thing qapi2texi.py still does with #optional is stripping it out. We still reject bogus qapi-schema.json and six places for qga/qapi-schema.json. Thus, you can't actually rely on #optional to see whether something is optional. Yet we still make people add it manually. That's just busy-work. Drop the code to check, fix up and strip out #optional, along with all instances of #optional. To keep it out, add code to reject it, to be dropped again once the dust settles. No change to generated documentation. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-18-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Common Python pitfall: 'assert base_members' fires on [] in addition to None. Correct to 'assert base_members is not None'. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-10-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
The new test case shows off qapi.py choking on an empty union base. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-9-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
qapi.py has a hardcoded white-list of type names that may violate the rule on use of upper and lower case. Add a new pragma directive 'name-case-whitelist', and use it to replace the hard-coded white-list. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-7-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
qapi.py has a hardcoded white-list of command names that may violate the rules on permitted return types. Add a new pragma directive 'returns-whitelist', and use it to replace the hard-coded white-list. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
This reverts commit 3313b612's changes to tests/qapi-schema/, except for tests/qapi-schema/doc-*. We could keep some of these doc comments to serve as positive test cases. However, they don't actually add to what we get from doc comment use in actual schemas, as we we don't test output matches expectations, and don't systematically cover doc comment features. Proper positive test coverage would be nice. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Markus Armbruster 提交于
Since we added the documentation generator in commit 3313b612, doc comments are mandatory. That's a very good idea for a schema that needs to be documented, but has proven to be annoying for testing. Make doc comments optional again, but add a new directive { 'pragma': { 'doc-required': true } } to let a QAPI schema require them. Add test cases for the new pragma directive. While there, plug a minor hole in includ directive test coverage. Require documentation in the schemas we actually want documented: qapi-schema.json and qga/qapi-schema.json. We could probably make qapi2texi.py cope with incomplete documentation, but for now, simply make it refuse to run unless the schema has 'doc-required': true. Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> [qapi-code-gen.txt wording tweaked] Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc-André Lureau 提交于
As the name suggests, the qapi2texi script converts JSON QAPI description into a texi file suitable for different target formats (info/man/txt/pdf/html...). It parses the following kind of blocks: Free-form: ## # = Section # == Subsection # # Some text foo with *emphasis* # 1. with a list # 2. like that # # And some code: # | $ echo foo # | -> do this # | <- get that # ## Symbol description: ## # @symbol: # # Symbol body ditto ergo sum. Foo bar # baz ding. # # @param1: the frob to frobnicate # @param2: #optional how hard to frobnicate # # Returns: the frobnicated frob. # If frob isn't frobnicatable, GenericError. # # Since: version # Notes: notes, comments can have # - itemized list # - like this # # Example: # # -> { "execute": "quit" } # <- { "return": {} } # ## That's roughly following the following EBNF grammar: api_comment = "##\n" comment "##\n" comment = freeform_comment | symbol_comment freeform_comment = { "# " text "\n" | "#\n" } symbol_comment = "# @" name ":\n" { member | tag_section | freeform_comment } member = "# @" name ':' [ text ] "\n" freeform_comment tag_section = "# " ( "Returns:", "Since:", "Note:", "Notes:", "Example:", "Examples:" ) [ text ] "\n" freeform_comment text = free text with markup Note that the grammar is ambiguous: a line "# @foo:\n" can be parsed both as freeform_comment and as symbol_comment. The actual parser recognizes symbol_comment. See docs/qapi-code-gen.txt for more details. Deficiencies and limitations: - the generated QMP documentation includes internal types - union type support is lacking - type information is lacking in generated documentation - doc comment error message positions are imprecise, they point to the beginning of the comment. - a few minor issues, all marked TODO/FIXME in the code Signed-off-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170113144135.5150-16-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [test-qapi.py tweaked to avoid trailing empty lines in .out] Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
-
- 19 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
Turn on the ability to pass command and event arguments in a single boxed parameter, which must name a non-empty type (although the type can be a struct with all optional members). For structs, it makes it possible to pass a single qapi type instead of a breakout of all struct members (useful if the arguments are already in a struct or if the number of members is large); for other complex types, it is now possible to use a union or alternate as the data for a command or event. The empty type may be technically feasible if needed down the road, but it's easier to forbid it now and relax things to allow it later, than it is to allow it now and have to special case how the generated 'q_empty' type is handled (see commit 7ce106a9 for reasons why nothing is generated for the empty type). An alternate type is never considered empty, but now that a boxed type can be either an object or an alternate, we have to provide a trivial QAPISchemaAlternateType.is_empty(). The new call to arg_type.is_empty() during QAPISchemaCommand.check() requires that we first check the type in question; but there is no chance of introducing a cycle since objects do not refer back to commands. We still have a split in syntax checking between ad-hoc parsing up front (merely validates that 'boxed' has a sane value) and during .check() methods (if 'boxed' is set, then 'data' must name a non-empty user-defined type). Generated code is unchanged, as long as no client uses the new feature. Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1468468228-27827-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Test files renamed to *-boxed-*] Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Blake 提交于
The next patch will add support for passing a qapi union type as the 'data' of a command. But to do that, the user function for implementing the command, as called by the generated marshal command, must take the corresponding C struct as a single boxed pointer, rather than a breakdown into one parameter per member. Even without a union, being able to use a C struct rather than a list of parameters can make it much easier to handle coding with QAPI. This patch adds the internal plumbing of a 'boxed' flag associated with each command and event. In several cases, this means adding indentation, with one new dead branch and the remaining branch being the original code more deeply nested; this was done so that the new implementation in the next patch is easier to review without also being mixed with indentation changes. For this patch, no behavior or generated output changes, other than the testsuite outputting the value of the new flag (always False for now). Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1468468228-27827-9-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Identifier box renamed to boxed in two places] Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
-