1. 08 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 16 3月, 2017 5 次提交
  3. 07 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 05 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 16 1月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      qapi: add qapi2texi script · 3313b612
      Marc-André Lureau 提交于
      As the name suggests, the qapi2texi script converts JSON QAPI
      description into a texi file suitable for different target
      formats (info/man/txt/pdf/html...).
      
      It parses the following kind of blocks:
      
      Free-form:
      
        ##
        # = Section
        # == Subsection
        #
        # Some text foo with *emphasis*
        # 1. with a list
        # 2. like that
        #
        # And some code:
        # | $ echo foo
        # | -> do this
        # | <- get that
        #
        ##
      
      Symbol description:
      
        ##
        # @symbol:
        #
        # Symbol body ditto ergo sum. Foo bar
        # baz ding.
        #
        # @param1: the frob to frobnicate
        # @param2: #optional how hard to frobnicate
        #
        # Returns: the frobnicated frob.
        #          If frob isn't frobnicatable, GenericError.
        #
        # Since: version
        # Notes: notes, comments can have
        #        - itemized list
        #        - like this
        #
        # Example:
        #
        # -> { "execute": "quit" }
        # <- { "return": {} }
        #
        ##
      
      That's roughly following the following EBNF grammar:
      
      api_comment = "##\n" comment "##\n"
      comment = freeform_comment | symbol_comment
      freeform_comment = { "# " text "\n" | "#\n" }
      symbol_comment = "# @" name ":\n" { member | tag_section | freeform_comment }
      member = "# @" name ':' [ text ] "\n" freeform_comment
      tag_section = "# " ( "Returns:", "Since:", "Note:", "Notes:", "Example:", "Examples:" ) [ text ]  "\n" freeform_comment
      text = free text with markup
      
      Note that the grammar is ambiguous: a line "# @foo:\n" can be parsed
      both as freeform_comment and as symbol_comment.  The actual parser
      recognizes symbol_comment.
      
      See docs/qapi-code-gen.txt for more details.
      
      Deficiencies and limitations:
      - the generated QMP documentation includes internal types
      - union type support is lacking
      - type information is lacking in generated documentation
      - doc comment error message positions are imprecise, they point
        to the beginning of the comment.
      - a few minor issues, all marked TODO/FIXME in the code
      Signed-off-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <20170113144135.5150-16-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      [test-qapi.py tweaked to avoid trailing empty lines in .out]
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      3313b612
  6. 25 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 20 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 19 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Implement boxed types for commands/events · c818408e
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Turn on the ability to pass command and event arguments in
      a single boxed parameter, which must name a non-empty type
      (although the type can be a struct with all optional members).
      For structs, it makes it possible to pass a single qapi type
      instead of a breakout of all struct members (useful if the
      arguments are already in a struct or if the number of members
      is large); for other complex types, it is now possible to use
      a union or alternate as the data for a command or event.
      
      The empty type may be technically feasible if needed down the
      road, but it's easier to forbid it now and relax things to allow
      it later, than it is to allow it now and have to special case
      how the generated 'q_empty' type is handled (see commit 7ce106a9
      for reasons why nothing is generated for the empty type).  An
      alternate type is never considered empty, but now that a boxed
      type can be either an object or an alternate, we have to provide
      a trivial QAPISchemaAlternateType.is_empty().  The new call to
      arg_type.is_empty() during QAPISchemaCommand.check() requires
      that we first check the type in question; but there is no chance
      of introducing a cycle since objects do not refer back to commands.
      
      We still have a split in syntax checking between ad-hoc parsing
      up front (merely validates that 'boxed' has a sane value) and
      during .check() methods (if 'boxed' is set, then 'data' must name
      a non-empty user-defined type).
      
      Generated code is unchanged, as long as no client uses the
      new feature.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1468468228-27827-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      [Test files renamed to *-boxed-*]
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      c818408e
  9. 06 7月, 2016 4 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Add new visit_complete() function · 3b098d56
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Making each output visitor provide its own output collection
      function was the only remaining reason for exposing visitor
      sub-types to the rest of the code base.  Add a polymorphic
      visit_complete() function which is a no-op for input visitors,
      and which populates an opaque pointer for output visitors.  For
      maximum type-safety, also add a parameter to the output visitor
      constructors with a type-correct version of the output pointer,
      and assert that the two uses match.
      
      This approach was considered superior to either passing the
      output parameter only during construction (action at a distance
      during visit_free() feels awkward) or only during visit_complete()
      (defeating type safety makes it easier to use incorrectly).
      
      Most callers were function-local, and therefore a mechanical
      conversion; the testsuite was a bit trickier, but the previous
      cleanup patch minimized the churn here.
      
      The visit_complete() function may be called at most once; doing
      so lets us use transfer semantics rather than duplication or
      ref-count semantics to get the just-built output back to the
      caller, even though it means our behavior is not idempotent.
      
      Generated code is simplified as follows for events:
      
      |@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP
      |     QDict *qmp;
      |     Error *err = NULL;
      |     QMPEventFuncEmit emit;
      |-    QmpOutputVisitor *qov;
      |+    QObject *obj;
      |     Visitor *v;
      |     q_obj_ACPI_DEVICE_OST_arg param = {
      |         info
      |@@ -39,8 +39,7 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP
      |
      |     qmp = qmp_event_build_dict("ACPI_DEVICE_OST");
      |
      |-    qov = qmp_output_visitor_new();
      |-    v = qmp_output_get_visitor(qov);
      |+    v = qmp_output_visitor_new(&obj);
      |
      |     visit_start_struct(v, "ACPI_DEVICE_OST", NULL, 0, &err);
      |     if (err) {
      |@@ -55,7 +54,8 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP
      |         goto out;
      |     }
      |
      |-    qdict_put_obj(qmp, "data", qmp_output_get_qobject(qov));
      |+    visit_complete(v, &obj);
      |+    qdict_put_obj(qmp, "data", obj);
      |     emit(QAPI_EVENT_ACPI_DEVICE_OST, qmp, &err);
      
      and for commands:
      
      | {
      |     Error *err = NULL;
      |-    QmpOutputVisitor *qov = qmp_output_visitor_new();
      |     Visitor *v;
      |
      |-    v = qmp_output_get_visitor(qov);
      |+    v = qmp_output_visitor_new(ret_out);
      |     visit_type_AddfdInfo(v, "unused", &ret_in, &err);
      |-    if (err) {
      |-        goto out;
      |+    if (!err) {
      |+        visit_complete(v, ret_out);
      |     }
      |-    *ret_out = qmp_output_get_qobject(qov);
      |-
      |-out:
      |     error_propagate(errp, err);
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-13-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      3b098d56
    • E
      qmp-input-visitor: Favor new visit_free() function · b70ce101
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Now that we have a polymorphic visit_free(), we no longer need
      qmp_input_visitor_cleanup(); which in turn means we no longer
      need to return a subtype from qmp_input_visitor_new() nor a
      public upcast function.
      
      Generated code changes to qmp-marshal.c look like:
      
      |@@ -52,11 +52,10 @@ void qmp_marshal_add_fd(QDict *args, QOb
      | {
      |     Error *err = NULL;
      |     AddfdInfo *retval;
      |-    QmpInputVisitor *qiv = qmp_input_visitor_new(QOBJECT(args), true);
      |     Visitor *v;
      |     q_obj_add_fd_arg arg = {0};
      |
      |-    v = qmp_input_get_visitor(qiv);
      |+    v = qmp_input_visitor_new(QOBJECT(args), true);
      |     visit_start_struct(v, NULL, NULL, 0, &err);
      |     if (err) {
      |         goto out;
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-8-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      b70ce101
    • E
      qapi: Add new visit_free() function · 2c0ef9f4
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Making each visitor provide its own (awkwardly-named) FOO_cleanup()
      is unusual, when we can instead have a polymorphic visit_free()
      interface.  Over the next few patches, we can use the polymorphic
      functions to eliminate the need for a FOO_get_visitor() function
      for accessing specific visitor functionality, once everything can
      be accessed directly through the Visitor* interfaces.
      
      The dealloc visitor is the first one converted to completely use
      the new entry point, since qapi_dealloc_visitor_cleanup() was the
      only reason that qapi_dealloc_get_visitor() existed, and only
      generated and testsuite code was even using it.  With the new
      visit_free() entry point in place, we no longer need to expose
      the QapiDeallocVisitor subtype through qapi_dealloc_visitor_new(),
      and can get by with less generated code, with diffs that look like:
      
      | void qapi_free_ACPIOSTInfo(ACPIOSTInfo *obj)
      | {
      |-    QapiDeallocVisitor *qdv;
      |     Visitor *v;
      |
      |     if (!obj) {
      |         return;
      |     }
      |
      |-    qdv = qapi_dealloc_visitor_new();
      |-    v = qapi_dealloc_get_visitor(qdv);
      |+    v = qapi_dealloc_visitor_new();
      |     visit_type_ACPIOSTInfo(v, NULL, &obj, NULL);
      |-    qapi_dealloc_visitor_cleanup(qdv);
      |+    visit_free(v);
      |}
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      2c0ef9f4
    • E
      qapi: Add parameter to visit_end_* · 1158bb2a
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Rather than making the dealloc visitor track of stack of pointers
      remembered during visit_start_* in order to free them during
      visit_end_*, it's a lot easier to just make all callers pass the
      same pointer to visit_end_*.  The generated code has access to the
      same pointer, while all other users are doing virtual walks and
      can pass NULL.  The dealloc visitor is then greatly simplified.
      
      All three visit_end_*() functions intentionally take a void**,
      even though the visit_start_*() functions differ between void**,
      GenericList**, and GenericAlternate**.  This is done for several
      reasons: when doing a virtual walk, passing NULL doesn't care
      what the type is, but when doing a generated walk, we already
      have to cast the caller's specific FOO* to call visit_start,
      while using void** lets us use visit_end without a cast. Also,
      an upcoming patch will add a clone visitor that wants to use
      the same implementation for all three visit_end callbacks,
      which is made easier if all three share the same signature.
      
      For visitors with already track per-object state (the QMP visitors
      via a stack, and the string visitors which do not allow nesting),
      add an assertion that the caller is indeed passing the same
      pointer to paired calls.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-4-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      1158bb2a
  10. 07 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 12 5月, 2016 5 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Change visit_type_FOO() to no longer return partial objects · 68ab47e4
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Returning a partial object on error is an invitation for a careless
      caller to leak memory.  We already fixed things in an earlier
      patch to guarantee NULL if visit_start fails ("qapi: Guarantee
      NULL obj on input visitor callback error"), but that does not
      help the case where visit_start succeeds but some other failure
      happens before visit_end, such that we leak a partially constructed
      object outside visit_type_FOO(). As no one outside the testsuite
      was actually relying on these semantics, it is cleaner to just
      document and guarantee that ALL pointer-based visit_type_FOO()
      functions always leave a safe value in *obj during an input visitor
      (either the new object on success, or NULL if an error is
      encountered), so callers can now unconditionally use
      qapi_free_FOO() to clean up regardless of whether an error occurred.
      
      The decision is done by adding visit_is_input(), then updating the
      generated code to check if additional cleanup is needed based on
      the type of visitor in use.
      
      Note that we still leave *obj unchanged after a scalar-based
      visit_type_FOO(); I did not feel like auditing all uses of
      visit_type_Enum() to see if the callers would tolerate a specific
      sentinel value (not to mention having to decide whether it would
      be better to use 0 or ENUM__MAX as that sentinel).
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-25-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      68ab47e4
    • E
      qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() · d9f62dde
      Eric Blake 提交于
      The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the
      following pseudocode when FooList is used:
      
      start()
      for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) {
          visit(&cur->value)
      }
      
      Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that
      the first call to next() return the list head, while all other
      calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor
      implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether
      to return the input as-is, or to advance.  It also requires an
      argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first
      iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so
      that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing.
      
      Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire
      code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids
      visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source
      than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py.  That is, all other
      list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same
      paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how
      lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients.
      
      We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case
      into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop
      to visit before advance:
      
      start(head)
      for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) {
          visit(&tail->value)
      }
      
      With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track,
      the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it
      also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a
      FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of
      not knowing if an allocation happened until the first
      visit_next_list()).  As a minor drawback, we now allocate in
      two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to
      both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to
      cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but
      that defeats the goal of less visitor state).
      
      The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match
      visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'.
      
      The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for
      list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct()
      when a qapi type is not used in those visits.  It was easy to
      provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors,
      and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches
      refactored things to make this patch straightforward).  But it
      turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other
      state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just
      document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion
      will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the
      future.
      
      Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of
      the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      d9f62dde
    • E
      qapi: Split visit_end_struct() into pieces · 15c2f669
      Eric Blake 提交于
      As mentioned in previous patches, we want to call visit_end_struct()
      functions unconditionally, so that visitors can release resources
      tied up since the matching visit_start_struct() without also having
      to worry about error priority if more than one error occurs.
      
      Even though error_propagate() can be safely used to ignore a second
      error during cleanup caused by a first error, it is simpler if the
      cleanup cannot set an error.  So, split out the error checking
      portion (basically, input visitors checking for unvisited keys) into
      a new function visit_check_struct(), which can be safely skipped if
      any earlier errors are encountered, and leave the cleanup portion
      (which never fails, but must be called unconditionally if
      visit_start_struct() succeeded) in visit_end_struct().
      
      Generated code in qapi-visit.c has diffs resembling:
      
      |@@ -59,10 +59,12 @@ void visit_type_ACPIOSTInfo(Visitor *v,
      |         goto out_obj;
      |     }
      |     visit_type_ACPIOSTInfo_members(v, obj, &err);
      |-    error_propagate(errp, err);
      |-    err = NULL;
      |+    if (err) {
      |+        goto out_obj;
      |+    }
      |+    visit_check_struct(v, &err);
      | out_obj:
      |-    visit_end_struct(v, &err);
      |+    visit_end_struct(v);
      | out:
      
      and in qapi-event.c:
      
      @@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP
      |         goto out;
      |     }
      |     visit_type_q_obj_ACPI_DEVICE_OST_arg_members(v, &param, &err);
      |-    visit_end_struct(v, err ? NULL : &err);
      |+    if (!err) {
      |+        visit_check_struct(v, &err);
      |+    }
      |+    visit_end_struct(v);
      |     if (err) {
      |         goto out;
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      [Conflict with a doc fixup resolved]
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      15c2f669
    • E
      qapi-commands: Wrap argument visit in visit_start_struct · ed841535
      Eric Blake 提交于
      The qmp-input visitor was allowing callers to play rather fast
      and loose: when visiting a QDict, you could grab members of the
      root dictionary without first pushing into the dict; among the
      culprit callers was the generated marshal code on the 'arguments'
      dictionary of a QMP command.  But we are about to tighten the
      input visitor, at which point the generated marshal code MUST
      follow the same paradigms as everyone else, of pushing into the
      struct before grabbing its keys.
      
      Generated code grows as follows:
      
      |@@ -515,7 +641,12 @@ void qmp_marshal_blockdev_backup(QDict *
      |     BlockdevBackup arg = {0};
      |
      |     v = qmp_input_get_visitor(qiv);
      |+    visit_start_struct(v, NULL, NULL, 0, &err);
      |+    if (err) {
      |+        goto out;
      |+    }
      |     visit_type_BlockdevBackup_members(v, &arg, &err);
      |+    visit_end_struct(v, err ? NULL : &err);
      |     if (err) {
      |         goto out;
      |     }
      |@@ -527,7 +715,9 @@ out:
      |     qmp_input_visitor_cleanup(qiv);
      |     qdv = qapi_dealloc_visitor_new();
      |     v = qapi_dealloc_get_visitor(qdv);
      |+    visit_start_struct(v, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL);
      |     visit_type_BlockdevBackup_members(v, &arg, NULL);
      |+    visit_end_struct(v, NULL);
      |     qapi_dealloc_visitor_cleanup(qdv);
      | }
      
      The use of 'err ? NULL : &err' is temporary; a later patch will
      clean that up when it splits visit_end_struct().
      
      Prior to this patch, the fact that there was no final
      visit_end_struct() meant that even though we are using a strict
      input visit, the marshalling code was not detecting excess input
      at the top level (only in nested levels).  Fortunately, we have
      code in monitor.c:qmp_check_client_args() that also checks for
      no excess arguments at the top level.  But as the generated code
      is more compact than the manual check, a later patch will clean
      up monitor.c to drop the redundancy added here.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-9-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      ed841535
    • E
      qapi: Consolidate QMP input visitor creation · fc471c18
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Rather than having two separate ways to create a QMP input
      visitor, where the safer approach has the more verbose name,
      it is better to consolidate things into a single function
      where the caller must explicitly choose whether to be strict
      or to ignore excess input.  This patch is the strictly
      mechanical conversion; the next patch will then audit which
      uses can be made stricter.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      fc471c18
  12. 18 3月, 2016 3 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Allow anonymous base for flat union · ac4338f8
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Rather than requiring all flat unions to explicitly create
      a separate base struct, we can allow the qapi schema to specify
      the common members via an inline dictionary. This is similar to
      how commands can specify an inline anonymous type for its 'data'.
      We already have several struct types that only exist to serve as
      a single flat union's base; the next commit will clean them up.
      In particular, this patch's change to the BlockdevOptions example
      in qapi-code-gen.txt will actually be done in the real QAPI schema.
      
      Now that anonymous bases are legal, we need to rework the
      flat-union-bad-base negative test (as previously written, it
      forms what is now valid QAPI; tweak it to now provide coverage
      of a new error message path), and add a positive test in
      qapi-schema-test to use an anonymous base (making the integer
      argument optional, for even more coverage).
      
      Note that this patch only allows anonymous bases for flat unions;
      simple unions are already enough syntactic sugar that we do not
      want to burden them further.  Meanwhile, while it would be easy
      to also allow an anonymous base for structs, that would be quite
      redundant, as the members can be put right into the struct
      instead.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1458254921-17042-15-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      ac4338f8
    • E
      qapi: Make BlockdevOptions doc example closer to reality · bd59adce
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Although we don't want to repeat the entire BlockdevOptions
      QMP command in the example, it helps if we aren't needlessly
      diverging (the initial example was written before we had
      committed the actual QMP interface).  Use names that match what
      is found in qapi/block-core.json, such as '*read-only' rather
      than 'readonly', or 'BlockdevRef' rather than 'BlockRef'.
      
      For the simple union example, invent BlockdevOptionsSimple so
      that later text is unambiguous which of the two union forms is
      meant (telling the user to refer back to two 'BlockdevOptions'
      wasn't nice, and QMP has only the flat union form).
      
      Also, mention that the discriminator of a flat union is
      non-optional.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1458254921-17042-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      bd59adce
    • E
      qapi: Adjust names of implicit types · 7599697c
      Eric Blake 提交于
      The original choice of ':obj-' as the prefix for implicit types
      made it obvious that we weren't going to clash with any user-defined
      names, which cannot contain ':'.  But now we want to create structs
      for implicit types, to get rid of special cases in the generators,
      and our use of ':' in implicit names needs a tweak to produce valid
      C code.
      
      We could transliterate ':' to '_', except that C99 mandates that
      "identifiers that begin with an underscore are always reserved for
      use as identifiers with file scope in both the ordinary and tag name
      spaces".  So it's time to change our naming convention: we can
      instead use the 'q_' prefix that we reserved for ourselves back in
      commit 9fb081e0.  Technically, since we aren't planning on exposing
      the empty type in generated code, we could keep the name ':empty',
      but renaming it to 'q_empty' makes the check for startswith('q_')
      cover all implicit types, whether or not code is generated for them.
      
      As long as we don't declare 'empty' or 'obj' ticklish, it shouldn't
      clash with c_name() prepending 'q_' to the user's ticklish names.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1458254921-17042-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      7599697c
  13. 05 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Update docs to match recent generator changes · 9ee86b85
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Several commits have been changing the generator, but not updating
      the docs to match:
      - The implicit tag member is named "type", not "kind".  Screwed up in
      commit 39a18158.
      - Commit 9f08c8ec made list types lazy, and thereby dropped
      UserDefOneList if nothing explicitly uses the list type.
      - Commit 51e72bc1 switched the parameter order with 'name' occurring
      earlier.
      - Commit e65d89bf changed the layout of UserDefOneList.
      - Prefer the term 'member' over 'field'.
      - We now expose visit_type_FOO_members() for objects.
      - etc.
      
      Rework the examples to show slightly more output (we don't want to
      show too much; that's what the testsuite is for), and regenerate the
      output to match all recent changes.  Also, rearrange output to show
      .h files before .c (understanding the interface first often makes
      the implementation easier to follow).
      Reported-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1457021813-10704-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      9ee86b85
  14. 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Forbid empty unions and useless alternates · 02a57ae3
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Empty unions serve no purpose, and while we compile with gcc
      which permits them, strict C99 forbids them.  We happen to inject
      a dummy 'void *data' member into the C unions that represent QAPI
      unions and alternates, but we want to get rid of that member (it
      pollutes the namespace for no good reason), which would leave us
      with an empty union if the user didn't provide any branches.  While
      empty structs make sense in QAPI, empty unions don't add any
      expressiveness to the QMP language.  So prohibit them at parse
      time.  Update the documentation and testsuite to match.
      
      Note that the documentation already mentioned that alternates
      should have "two or more JSON data types"; so this also fixes
      the code to enforce that.  However, we have existing uses of a
      union type with only one branch, so the 2-or-more strictness
      is intentionally limited to alternates.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1455778109-6278-3-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      02a57ae3
  15. 17 12月, 2015 4 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Simplify visiting of alternate types · 0426d53c
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Previously, working with alternates required two lookup arrays
      and some indirection: for type Foo, we created Foo_qtypes[]
      which maps each qtype to a value of the generated FooKind enum,
      then look up that value in FooKind_lookup[] like we do for other
      union types.
      
      This has a couple of subtle bugs.  First, the generator was
      creating a call with a parameter '(int *) &(*obj)->type' where
      type is an enum type; this is unsafe if the compiler chooses
      to store the enum type in a different size than int, where
      assigning through the wrong size pointer can corrupt data or
      cause a SIGBUS.
      
      Related bug, not not fixed in this patch: qapi-visit.py's
      gen_visit_enum() generates a cast of its enum * argument to
      int *. Marked FIXME.
      
      Second, since the values of the FooKind enum start at zero, all
      entries of the Foo_qtypes[] array that were not explicitly
      initialized will map to the same branch of the union as the
      first member of the alternate, rather than triggering a desired
      failure in visit_get_next_type().  Fortunately, the bug seldom
      bites; the very next thing the input visitor does is try to
      parse the incoming JSON with the wrong parser, which normally
      fails; the output visitor is not used with a C struct in that
      state, and the dealloc visitor has nothing to clean up (so
      there is no leak).
      
      However, the second bug IS observable in one case: parsing an
      integer causes unusual behavior in an alternate that contains
      at least a 'number' member but no 'int' member, because the
      'number' parser accepts QTYPE_QINT in addition to the expected
      QTYPE_QFLOAT (that is, since 'int' is not a member, the type
      QTYPE_QINT accidentally maps to FooKind 0; if this enum value
      is the 'number' branch the integer parses successfully, but if
      the 'number' branch is not first, some other branch tries to
      parse the integer and rejects it).  A later patch will worry
      about fixing alternates to always parse all inputs that a
      non-alternate 'number' would accept, for now this is still
      marked FIXME in the updated test-qmp-input-visitor.c, to
      merely point out that new undesired behavior of 'ans' matches
      the existing undesired behavior of 'asn'.
      
      This patch fixes the default-initialization bug by deleting the
      indirection, and modifying get_next_type() to directly assign a
      QTypeCode parameter.  This in turn fixes the type-casting bug,
      as we are no longer casting a pointer to enum to a questionable
      size. There is no longer a need to generate an implicit FooKind
      enum associated with the alternate type (since the QMP wire
      format never uses the stringized counterparts of the C union
      member names).  Since the updated visit_get_next_type() does not
      know which qtypes are expected, the generated visitor is
      modified to generate an error statement if an unexpected type is
      encountered.
      
      Callers now have to know the QTYPE_* mapping when looking at the
      discriminator; but so far, only the testsuite was even using the
      C struct of an alternate types.  I considered the possibility of
      keeping the internal enum FooKind, but initialized differently
      than most generated arrays, as in:
        typedef enum FooKind {
            FOO_KIND_A = QTYPE_QDICT,
            FOO_KIND_B = QTYPE_QINT,
        } FooKind;
      to create nicer aliases for knowing when to use foo->a or foo->b
      when inspecting foo->type; but it turned out to add too much
      complexity, especially without a client.
      
      There is a user-visible side effect to this change, but I
      consider it to be an improvement. Previously,
      the invalid QMP command:
        {"execute":"blockdev-add", "arguments":{"options":
          {"driver":"raw", "id":"a", "file":true}}}
      failed with:
        {"error": {"class": "GenericError",
          "desc": "Invalid parameter type for 'file', expected: QDict"}}
      (visit_get_next_type() succeeded, and the error comes from the
      visit_type_BlockdevOptions() expecting {}; there is no mention of
      the fact that a string would also work).  Now it fails with:
        {"error": {"class": "GenericError",
          "desc": "Invalid parameter type for 'file', expected: BlockdevRef"}}
      (the error when the next type doesn't match any expected types for
      the overall alternate).
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1449033659-25497-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      0426d53c
    • E
      qapi: Convert QType into QAPI built-in enum type · 7264f5c5
      Eric Blake 提交于
      What's more meta than using qapi to define qapi? :)
      
      Convert QType into a full-fledged[*] builtin qapi enum type, so
      that a subsequent patch can then use it as the discriminator
      type of qapi alternate types.  Fortunately, the judicious use of
      'prefix' in the qapi definition avoids churn to the spelling of
      the enum constants.
      
      To avoid circular definitions, we have to flip the order of
      inclusion between "qobject.h" vs. "qapi-types.h".  Back in commit
      28770e05, we had the latter include the former, so that we could
      use 'QObject *' for our implementation of 'any'.  But that usage
      also works with only a forward declaration, whereas the
      definition of QObject requires QType to be a complete type.
      
      [*] The type has to be builtin, rather than declared in
      qapi/common.json, because we want to use it for alternates even
      when common.json is not included. But since it is the first
      builtin enum type, we have to add special cases to qapi-types
      and qapi-visit to only emit definitions once, even when two
      qapi files are being compiled into the same binary (the way we
      already handled builtin list types like 'intList').  We may
      need to revisit how multiple qapi files share common types,
      but that's a project for another day.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1449033659-25497-4-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      7264f5c5
    • E
      qapi: Don't let implicit enum MAX member collide · 7fb1cf16
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Now that we guarantee the user doesn't have any enum values
      beginning with a single underscore, we can use that for our
      own purposes.  Renaming ENUM_MAX to ENUM__MAX makes it obvious
      that the sentinel is generated.
      
      This patch was mostly generated by applying a temporary patch:
      
      |diff --git a/scripts/qapi.py b/scripts/qapi.py
      |index e6d014b..b862ec9 100644
      |--- a/scripts/qapi.py
      |+++ b/scripts/qapi.py
      |@@ -1570,6 +1570,7 @@ const char *const %(c_name)s_lookup[] = {
      |     max_index = c_enum_const(name, 'MAX', prefix)
      |     ret += mcgen('''
      |     [%(max_index)s] = NULL,
      |+// %(max_index)s
      | };
      | ''',
      |                max_index=max_index)
      
      then running:
      
      $ cat qapi-{types,event}.c tests/test-qapi-types.c |
          sed -n 's,^// \(.*\)MAX,s|\1MAX|\1_MAX|g,p' > list
      $ git grep -l _MAX | xargs sed -i -f list
      
      The only things not generated are the changes in scripts/qapi.py.
      
      Rejecting enum members named 'MAX' is now useless, and will be dropped
      in the next patch.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1447836791-369-23-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
      [Rebased to current master, commit message tweaked]
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      7fb1cf16
    • E
      qapi: Tighten the regex on valid names · 59a92fee
      Eric Blake 提交于
      We already documented that qapi names should match specific
      patterns (such as starting with a letter unless it was an enum
      value or a downstream extension).  Tighten that from a suggestion
      into a hard requirement, which frees up names beginning with a
      single underscore for qapi internal usage.
      
      The tighter regex doesn't forbid everything insane that a user
      could provide (for example, a user could name a type 'Foo-lookup'
      to collide with the generated 'Foo_lookup[]' for an enum 'Foo'),
      but does a good job at protecting the most obvious uses, and
      also happens to reserve single leading underscore for later use.
      
      The handling of enum values starting with a digit is tricky:
      commit 9fb081e0 introduced a subtle bug by using c_name() on
      a munged value, which would allow an enum to include the
      member 'q-int' in spite of our reservation.  Furthermore,
      munging with a leading '_' would fail our tighter regex.  So
      fix it by only munging for leading digits (which are never
      ticklish in c_name()) and by using a different prefix (I
      picked 'D', although any letter should do).
      
      Add new tests, reserved-member-underscore and reserved-enum-q,
      to demonstrate the tighter checking.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1447836791-369-22-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1447883135-18020-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      [Eric's fixup squashed in]
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      59a92fee
  16. 17 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Document introspection stability considerations · 39a65e2c
      Eric Blake 提交于
      We are not ready (and might never be ready) to declare
      introspection stable between releases. Clients written to
      control multiple versions of qemu, and desiring to know
      whether a particular member is supported for a given
      command, must be prepared to locate that member in spite
      of qapi changes that may affect the member's location or
      type within the overall object, even though such changes
      did not break QMP wire back-compatibility.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1447264202-19554-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      39a65e2c
  17. 10 11月, 2015 2 次提交
    • E
      qapi-introspect: Document lack of sorting · f5455044
      Eric Blake 提交于
      qapi-code-gen.txt already claims that types, commands, and
      events share a common namespace; set this in stone by further
      documenting that our introspection output will never have
      collisions with the same name tied to more than one meta-type.
      
      Our largest QMP enum currently has 125 values, our largest
      object type has 27 members, and the mean for each is less than
      10.  These sizes are small enough that the per-element overhead
      of O(log n) binary searching probably outweighs the speed
      possible with direct O(n) linear searching (a better algorithm
      with more overhead will only beat a leaner naive algorithm only
      as you scale to larger input sizes).
      
      Arguably, the overall SchemaInfo array could be sorted by name;
      there, we currently have 531 entities, large enough for a binary
      search to be faster than linear.  However, remember that we have
      mutually-recursive types, which means there is no topological
      ordering that will allow clients to learn all information about
      that type in a single linear pass; thus clients will want to do
      random access over the data, and they will probably read the
      introspection output into a hashtable for O(1) lookup rather
      than O(log n) binary searching, at which point, pre-sorting our
      introspection output doesn't help the client.
      
      It doesn't help that sorting can be subjective if you introduce
      locales into the mix (I'm not experienced enough with Python
      to know for sure, but at least it looks like it defaults to
      sorting in the C locale even when run under a different locale).
      And while our current introspection output is deterministic
      (because we visit entities in a sorted order), we may want
      to change that order in the future (such as using OrderedDict
      to stick to .json declaration order).
      
      For these reasons, we simply document that clients should not
      rely on any particular order of items in introspection output.
      And since it is now a documented part of the contract, we have
      the freedom to later rearrange output if needed, without
      worrying about breaking well-written clients.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1446791754-23823-13-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      [Commit message tweaked]
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      f5455044
    • E
      qapi: Provide nicer array names in introspection · ce5fcb47
      Eric Blake 提交于
      For the sake of humans reading introspection output, it is nice
      to have the name of implicit array types be recognizable as
      arrays of the underlying type.  However, while this patch allows
      humans to skip from a command with return type "[123]" straight
      to the definition of type "123" without having to first inspect
      type "[123]", document that this shortcut should not be taken by
      client apps.
      
      This makes the resulting introspection string slightly larger by
      default (just over 200 bytes), but it's in the noise (less than
      0.3% of the overall 70k size of 'query-qmp-capabilities').
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1446791754-23823-12-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      ce5fcb47
  18. 02 11月, 2015 2 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Reserve 'q_*' and 'has_*' member names · 9fb081e0
      Eric Blake 提交于
      c_name() produces names starting with 'q_' when protecting a
      dictionary member name that would fail to directly compile, but
      in doing so can cause clashes with any member name already
      beginning with 'q-' or 'q_'.  Likewise, we create a C name 'has_'
      for any optional member that can clash with any member name
      beginning with 'has-' or 'has_'.
      
      Technically, rather than blindly reserving the namespace,
      we could try to complain about user names only when an actual
      collision occurs, or even teach c_name() how to munge names
      to avoid collisions.  But it is not trivial, especially when
      collisions can occur across multiple types (such as via
      inheritance or flat unions).  Besides, no existing .json
      files are trying to use these names.  So it's easier to just
      outright forbid the potential for collision.  We can always
      relax things in the future if a real need arises for QMP to
      express member names that have been forbidden here.
      
      'has_' only has to be reserved for struct/union member names,
      while 'q_' is reserved everywhere (matching the fact that
      only members can be optional, while we use c_name() for munging
      both members and entities).  Note that we could relax 'q_'
      restrictions on entities independently from member names; for
      example, c_name('qmp_' + 'unix') would result in a different
      function name than our current 'qmp_' + c_name('unix').
      
      Update and add tests to cover the new error messages.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      [Consistently pass protect=False to c_name(); commit message tweaked
      slightly]
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      9fb081e0
    • E
      qapi: Reserve '*List' type names for list types · 255960dd
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Type names ending in 'List' can clash with qapi list types in
      generated C.  We don't currently use such names. It is easier to
      outlaw them now than to worry about how to resolve such a clash
      in the future. For precedence, see commit 4dc2e690, which did the
      same for names ending in 'Kind' versus implicit enum types for
      qapi unions.
      
      Update the testsuite to match.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      255960dd
  19. 13 10月, 2015 2 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Consistent generated code: prefer visitor 'v' · f8b7f1a8
      Eric Blake 提交于
      We had some pointless differences in the generated code for visit,
      command marshalling, and events; unifying them makes it easier for
      future patches to consolidate to common helper functions.
      This is one patch of a series to clean up these differences.
      
      This patch names the local visitor variable 'v' rather than 'm'.
      Related objects, such as 'QapiDeallocVisitor', are also named by
      their initials instead of an unrelated leading m.
      
      No change in semantics to the generated code.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-12-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      f8b7f1a8
    • E
      qapi: Consistent generated code: prefer error 'err' · 2a0f50e8
      Eric Blake 提交于
      We had some pointless differences in the generated code for visit,
      command marshalling, and events; unifying them makes it easier for
      future patches to consolidate to common helper functions.
      This is one patch of a series to clean up these differences.
      
      This patch consistently names the local error variable 'err' rather
      than 'local_err'.
      
      No change in semantics to the generated code.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-11-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      2a0f50e8
  20. 21 9月, 2015 1 次提交