1. 07 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 03 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 20 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  4. 10 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 19 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      device_tree: Add qemu_devtree_setprop_sized_cells() utility functions · 97c38f8c
      Peter Maydell 提交于
      We already have a qemu_devtree_setprop_cells() which sets a dtb
      property to an array of cells whose values are specified by varargs.
      However for the fairly common case of setting a property to a list
      of addresses or of address,size pairs the number of cells used by
      each element in the list depends on the parent's #address-cells
      and #size-cells properties. To make this easier we provide an analogous
      qemu_devtree_setprop_sized_cells() macro which allows the number
      of cells used by each element to be specified. This is implemented
      using an underlying qemu_devtree_setprop_sized_cells_from_array()
      function which takes the values and sizes as an array; this may
      also be directly useful for cases where the cell contents are
      constructed programmatically.
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      Reviewed-by: NPeter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
      Message-id: 1373977512-28932-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
      97c38f8c
  6. 10 7月, 2013 2 次提交
  7. 12 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 19 12月, 2012 2 次提交
  9. 05 10月, 2012 2 次提交
  10. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 24 6月, 2012 10 次提交
  12. 26 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 06 10月, 2011 4 次提交
    • A
      device tree: give dt more size · ded57c5f
      Alexander Graf 提交于
      We currently load a device tree blob and then just take its size x2 to
      account for modifications we do inside. While this is nice and great,
      it fails when we have a small device tree as blob and lots of nodes added
      in machine init code.
      
      So for now, just make it 20k bigger than it was before. We maybe want to
      be more clever about this later.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      ded57c5f
    • A
      device tree: dont fail operations · ccbcfedd
      Alexander Graf 提交于
      When we screw up and issue an FDT command that doesn't work, we really need to
      know immediately and usually can't continue to create the machine. To make sure
      we don't need to add error checking in all device tree modification code users,
      we can just add the fail checks to the qemu abstract functions.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      ccbcfedd
    • A
      device tree: add add_subnode command · 80ad7816
      Alexander Graf 提交于
      We want to be able to create subnodes in our device tree, so export it through
      the qemu device tree abstraction framework.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      80ad7816
    • A
      device tree: add nop_node · d69a8e63
      Alexander Graf 提交于
      We have a qemu internal abstraction layer on FDT. While I'm not fully convinced
      we need it at all, it's missing the nop_node functionality that we now need
      on e500. So let's add it and think about the general future of that API later.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      d69a8e63
  14. 21 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 16 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 02 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 23 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 25 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 11 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  20. 06 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 16 12月, 2008 1 次提交