Skip to content

Q
qemu

openeuler / qemu

通知 10
Star 0
Fork 0
Q
qemu

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 25 2月, 2019 2 次提交
    • D
      block/snapshot: remove bdrv_snapshot_delete_by_id_or_name · 8c04093c
      由 Daniel Henrique Barboza 提交于 
      After the previous patch, the only instance of this function left
is inside qemu-img.c.

qemu-img is using it inside the 'img_snapshot' function to delete
snapshots in the SNAPSHOT_DELETE case, based on a "snapshot_name"
string that refers to the tag, not ID, of the QEMUSnapshotInfo struct.
This can be verified by checking the SNAPSHOT_CREATE case that
comes shortly before SNAPSHOT_DELETE. In that case, the same
"snapshot_name" variable is being strcpy to the 'name' field
of the QEMUSnapshotInfo struct sn:

pstrcpy(sn.name, sizeof(sn.name), snapshot_name);

Based on that, it is unlikely that "snapshot_name" might contain
an "id" in SNAPSHOT_DELETE.

This patch changes SNAPSHOT_DELETE to use snapshot_find() and
snapshot_delete() instead of bdrv_snapshot_delete_by_id_or_name.
After that, there is no instances left of bdrv_snapshot_delete_by_id_or_name
in the code, so it is safe to remove it entirely.
Suggested-by: NMurilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
      8c04093c
    • D
      block/snapshot.c: eliminate use of ID input in snapshot operations · 6ca08045
      由 Daniel Henrique Barboza 提交于 
      At this moment, QEMU attempts to create/load/delete snapshots
by using either an ID (id_str) or a name. The problem is that the code
isn't consistent of whether the entered argument is an ID or a name,
causing unexpected behaviors.

For example, when creating snapshots via savevm <arg>, what happens is that
"arg" is treated as both name and id_str. In a guest without snapshots, create
a single snapshot via savevm:

(qemu) savevm 0
(qemu) info snapshots
List of snapshots present on all disks:
ID        TAG                 VM SIZE                DATE       VM CLOCK
--        0                      741M 2018-07-31 13:39:56   00:41:25.313

A snapshot with name "0" is created. ID is hidden from the user, but the
ID is a non-zero integer that starts at "1". Thus, this snapshot has
id_str=1, TAG="0". Creating a second snapshot with arg = 1, the first one
is deleted:

(qemu) savevm 1
(qemu) info snapshots
List of snapshots present on all disks:
ID        TAG                 VM SIZE                DATE       VM CLOCK
--        1                      741M 2018-07-31 13:42:14   00:41:55.252

What happened?

- when creating the second snapshot, a verification is done inside
bdrv_all_delete_snapshot to delete any existing snapshots that matches an
string argument. Here, the code calls bdrv_all_delete_snapshot("1", ...);

- bdrv_all_delete_snapshot calls bdrv_snapshot_find(..., "1") for each
BlockDriverState of the guest. And this is where things goes tilting:
bdrv_snapshot_find does a search by both id_str and name. It finds
out that there is a snapshot that has id_str = 1, stores a reference
to the snapshot in the sn_info pointer and then returns match found;

- since a match was found, a call to bdrv_snapshot_delete_by_id_or_name() is
made. This function ignores the pointer written by bdrv_snapshot_find. Instead,
it deletes the snapshot using bdrv_snapshot_delete() calling it first with
id_str = 1. If it fails to delete, then it calls it again with name = 1.

- after all that, QEMU creates the new snapshot, that has id_str = 1 and
name = 1. The user is left wondering that happened with the first snapshot
created. Similar bugs can be triggered when using loadvm and delvm.

Before contemplating discarding the use of ID input in these operations,
I've searched the code of what would be the implications. My findings
are:

- the RBD and Sheepdog drivers don't care. Both uses the 'name' field as
key in their logic, making id_str = name when appropriate.
replay-snapshot.c does not make any special use of id_str;

- qcow2 uses id_str as an unique identifier but it is automatically
calculated, not being influenced by user input. Other than that, there are
no distinguish operations made only with id_str;

- in blockdev.c, the delete operation uses a match of both id_str AND
name. Given that id_str is either a copy of 'name' or auto-generated,
we're fine here.

This gives motivation to not consider ID as a valid user input in HMP
commands - sticking with 'name' input only is more consistent. To
accomplish that, the following changes were made in this patch:

- bdrv_snapshot_find() does not match for id_str anymore, only 'name'. The
function is called in save_snapshot(), load_snapshot(), bdrv_all_delete_snapshot()
and bdrv_all_find_snapshot(). This change makes the search function more
predictable and does not change the behavior of any underlying code that uses
these affected functions, which are related to HMP (which is fine) and the
main loop inside vl.c (which doesn't care about it anyways);

- bdrv_all_delete_snapshot() does not call bdrv_snapshot_delete_by_id_or_name
anymore. Instead, it uses the pointer returned by bdrv_snapshot_find to
erase the snapshot with the exact match of id_str an name. This function
is called in save_snapshot and hmp_delvm, thus this change  produces the
intended effect;

- documentation changes to reflect the new behavior. I consider this to
be an API fix instead of an API change - the user was already creating
snapshots using 'name', but now he/she will also enjoy a consistent
behavior.

Ideally we would get rid of the id_str field entirely, but this would have
repercussions on existing snapshots. Another day perhaps.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
      6ca08045
  3. 15 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 15 6月, 2018 1 次提交
    • M
      block: Add block-specific QDict header · 609f45ea
      由 Max Reitz 提交于 
      There are numerous QDict functions that have been introduced for and are
used only by the block layer.  Move their declarations into an own
header file to reflect that.

While qdict_extract_subqdict() is in fact used outside of the block
layer (in util/qemu-config.c), it is still a function related very
closely to how the block layer works with nested QDicts, namely by
sometimes flattening them.  Therefore, its declaration is put into this
header as well and util/qemu-config.c includes it with a comment stating
exactly which function it needs.
Suggested-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180509165530.29561-7-mreitz@redhat.com>
[Copyright note tweaked, superfluous includes dropped]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
      609f45ea
  7. 04 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 09 2月, 2018 2 次提交
  11. 21 11月, 2017 3 次提交
  13. 18 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      block: Make bdrv_next() keep strong references · 5e003f17
      由 Max Reitz 提交于 
      On one hand, it is a good idea for bdrv_next() to return a strong
reference because ideally nearly every pointer should be refcounted.
This fixes intermittent failure of iotest 194.

On the other, it is absolutely necessary for bdrv_next() itself to keep
a strong reference to both the BB (in its first phase) and the BDS (at
least in the second phase) because when called the next time, it will
dereference those objects to get a link to the next one.  Therefore, it
needs these objects to stay around until then.  Just storing the pointer
to the next in the iterator is not really viable because that pointer
might become invalid as well.

Both arguments taken together means we should probably just invoke
bdrv_ref() and blk_ref() in bdrv_next().  This means we have to assert
that bdrv_next() is always called from the main loop, but that was
probably necessary already before this patch and judging from the
callers, it also looks to actually be the case.

Keeping these strong references means however that callers need to give
them up if they decide to abort the iteration early.  They can do so
through the new bdrv_next_cleanup() function.
Suggested-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20171110172545.32609-1-mreitz@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
      5e003f17
  15. 15 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 09 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 11 4月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      block: pass the right options for BlockDriver.bdrv_open() · 7a9e5119
      由 Dong Jia Shi 提交于 
      raw_open() expects the caller always passing in the right actual
@options parameter. But when trying to applying snapshot on a RBD
image, bdrv_snapshot_goto() calls raw_open() (by calling the
bdrv_open callback on the BlockDriver) with a NULL @options, and
that will result in a Segmentation fault.

For the other non-raw format drivers, it also makes sense to passing
in the actual options, althought they don't trigger the problem so
far.

Let's prepare a @options by adding the "file" key-value pair to a
copy of the actual options that were given for the node (i.e.
bs->options), and pass it to the callback.

BlockDriver.bdrv_open() expects bs->file to be NULL and just
overwrites it with the result from bdrv_open_child(). That means we
should actually make sure it's NULL because otherwise the child BDS
will have a reference count that is 1 too high. So we unconditionally
invoke bdrv_unref_child() before calling BlockDriver.bdrv_open(), and
we wrap everything in bdrv_ref()/bdrv_unref() so the BDS isn't
deleted in the meantime.
Suggested-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-id: 20170405091909.36357-2-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
      7a9e5119
  21. 20 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      block: Fix bdrv_next() memory leak · 88be7b4b
      由 Kevin Wolf 提交于 
      The bdrv_next() users all leaked the BdrvNextIterator after completing
the iteration. Simply changing bdrv_next() to free the iterator before
returning NULL at the end of list doesn't work because some callers exit
the loop before looking at all BDSes.

This patch moves the BdrvNextIterator from the heap to the stack of
the caller and switches to a bdrv_first()/bdrv_next() interface for
initialising the iterator.
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
      88be7b4b
  27. 19 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 23 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      include/qemu/osdep.h: Don't include qapi/error.h · da34e65c
      由 Markus Armbruster 提交于 
      Commit 57cb38b3 included qapi/error.h into qemu/osdep.h to get the
Error typedef.  Since then, we've moved to include qemu/osdep.h
everywhere.  Its file comment explains: "To avoid getting into
possible circular include dependencies, this file should not include
any other QEMU headers, with the exceptions of config-host.h,
compiler.h, os-posix.h and os-win32.h, all of which are doing a
similar job to this file and are under similar constraints."
qapi/error.h doesn't do a similar job, and it doesn't adhere to
similar constraints: it includes qapi-types.h.  That's in excess of
100KiB of crap most .c files don't actually need.

Add the typedef to qemu/typedefs.h, and include that instead of
qapi/error.h.  Include qapi/error.h in .c files that need it and don't
get it now.  Include qapi-types.h in qom/object.h for uint16List.

Update scripts/clean-includes accordingly.  Update it further to match
reality: replace config.h by config-target.h, add sysemu/os-posix.h,
sysemu/os-win32.h.  Update the list of includes in the qemu/osdep.h
comment quoted above similarly.

This reduces the number of objects depending on qapi/error.h from "all
of them" to less than a third.  Unfortunately, the number depending on
qapi-types.h shrinks only a little.  More work is needed for that one.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Fix compilation without the spice devel packages. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      da34e65c
  31. 20 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  33. 18 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  35. 19 11月, 2015 7 次提交
  37. 16 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  39. 07 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  41. 23 6月, 2015 2 次提交
  43. 28 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  45. 03 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  47. 18 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  49. 04 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  51. 12 9月, 2013 3 次提交