Skip to content

Q
qemu

openeuler / qemu

通知 10
Star 0
Fork 0
Q
qemu

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 03 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 08 3月, 2018 3 次提交
    • C
      s390x/sclp: proper support of larger send and receive masks · bc61c8c6
      由 Claudio Imbrenda 提交于 
      Until 67915de9 ("s390x/event-facility: variable-length event masks")
we only supported sclp event masks with a size of exactly 4 bytes, even
though the architecture allows the guests to set up sclp event masks
from 1 to 1021 bytes in length.
After that patch, the behaviour was almost compliant, but some issues
were still remaining, in particular regarding the handling of selective
reads and migration.

When setting the sclp event mask, a mask size is also specified. Until
now we only considered the size in order to decide which bits to save
in the internal state. On the other hand, when a guest performs a
selective read, it sends a mask, but it does not specify a size; the
implied size is the size of the last mask that has been set.

Specifying bits in the mask of selective read that are not available in
the internal mask should return an error, and bits past the end of the
mask should obviously be ignored. This can only be achieved by keeping
track of the lenght of the mask.

The mask length is thus now part of the internal state that needs to be
migrated.

This patch fixes the handling of selective reads, whose size will now
match the length of the event mask, as per architecture.

While the default behaviour is to be compliant with the architecture,
when using older machine models the old broken behaviour is selected
(allowing only masks of size exactly 4), in order to be able to migrate
toward older versions.

Fixes: 67915de9 ("s390x/event-facility: variable-length event masks")
Signed-off-by: NClaudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <1519407778-23095-2-git-send-email-imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      bc61c8c6
    • D
      numa: we don't implement NUMA for s390x · 81ce6aa5
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      Right now it is possible to crash QEMU for s390x by providing e.g.
    -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1

Problem is, that numa.c uses mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props as an
indicator whether NUMA is supported by a machine type. We don't
implement NUMA for s390x ("topology") yet. However we need
mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props for query-cpus.

So let's fix this case by also checking for mc->get_default_cpu_node_id,
which will be needed by machine_set_cpu_numa_node().

qemu-system-s390x: -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1: NUMA is not supported by
                   this machine-type

While at it, make s390_cpu_index_to_props() look like on other
architectures.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180227110255.20999-1-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      81ce6aa5
    • T
      hw/s390x: Add the possibility to specify the netboot image on the command line · 3c4e9baa
      由 Thomas Huth 提交于 
      The file name of the netboot binary is currently hard-coded to
"s390-netboot.img", without a possibility for the user to select
an alternative firmware image here. That's unfortunate, especially
since the basics are already there: The filename is a property of
the s390-ipl device. So we just have to add a check whether the user
already provided the property and only set the default if the string
is still empty. Now it is possible to select a different firmware
image with "-global s390-ipl.netboot_fw=/path/to/s390-netboot.img".
Signed-off-by: NThomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1519731154-3127-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      3c4e9baa
  5. 26 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 09 2月, 2018 3 次提交
  9. 19 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • I
      possible_cpus: add CPUArchId::type field · d342eb76
      由 Igor Mammedov 提交于 
      Remove dependency of possible_cpus on 1st CPU instance,
which decouples configuration data from CPU instances that
are created using that data.

Also later it would be used for enabling early cpu to numa node
configuration at runtime qmp_query_hotpluggable_cpus() should
provide a list of available cpu slots at early stage,
before machine_init() is called and the 1st cpu is created,
so that mgmt might be able to call it and use output to set
numa mapping.

Use MachineClass::possible_cpu_arch_ids() callback to set
cpu type info, along with the rest of possible cpu properties,
to let machine define which cpu type* will be used.

* for SPAPR it will be a spapr core type and for ARM/s390x/x86
  a respective descendant of CPUClass.

Move parse_numa_opts() in vl.c after cpu_model is parsed into
cpu_type so that possible_cpu_arch_ids() would know which
cpu_type to use during layout initialization.
Signed-off-by: NIgor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <1515597770-268979-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
      d342eb76
  11. 15 12月, 2017 5 次提交
    • C
      s390-ccw-virtio: allow for systems larger that 7.999TB · bb223055
      由 Christian Borntraeger 提交于 
      KVM does not allow memory regions > KVM_MEM_MAX_NR_PAGES, basically
limiting the memory per slot to 8TB-4k. As memory slots on s390/kvm must
be a multiple of 1MB we need start a new memory region if we cross
8TB-1M.

With that (and optimistic overcommitment in the kernel) I was able to
start a 24TB guest on a 1TB system.
Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20171211122146.162430-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
[CH: 1UL -> 1ULL in KVM_MEM_MAX_NR_PAGES; build fix on 32 bit hosts]
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      bb223055
    • D
      s390x: change the QEMU cpu model to a stripped down z12 · 35b4df64
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      We are good enough to boot upstream Linux kernels / Fedora 26/27. That
should be sufficient for now.

As the QEMU CPU model is migration safe, let's add compatibility code.
Generate the feature list to reduce the chance of messing things up in the
future.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20171208165529.14124-1-david@redhat.com>
[CH: squashed 's390x/cpumodel: make qemu cpu model play with "none" machine'
(20171213132407.5227-1-david@redhat.com) and 's390x/tcg: don't include z13
features in the qemu model' (20171213171512.17601-1-david@redhat.com) into
patch]
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      35b4df64
    • H
      s390x: deprecate s390-squash-mcss machine prop · d69969e5
      由 Halil Pasic 提交于 
      With the cssids unrestricted (commit "s390x/css: unrestrict cssids") the
s390-squash-mcss machine property should not be used.  Actually Libvirt
never supported this, so the expectation is that removing it should be
pretty painless.  But let's play nice and deprecate it first.
Signed-off-by: NHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20171206144438.28908-3-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      d69969e5
    • H
      s390x/css: unrestrict cssids · 99577c49
      由 Halil Pasic 提交于 
      The default css 0xfe is currently restricted to virtual subchannel
devices. The hope when the decision was made was, that non-virtual
subchannel devices will come around when guest can exploit multiple
channel subsystems. Since the guests generally don't do, the pain
of the partitioned (cssid) namespace outweighs the gain.

Let us remove the corresponding restrictions (virtual devices
can be put only in 0xfe and non-virtual devices in any css except
the 0xfe -- while s390-squash-mcss then remaps everything to cssid 0).

At the same time, change our schema for generating css bus ids to put
both virtual and non-virtual devices into the default css (spilling over
into other css images, if needed). The intention is to deprecate
s390-squash-mcss. With this change devices without a specified devno
won't end up hidden to guests not supporting multiple channel subsystems,
unless this can not be avoided (default css full).

Let us also advertise the changes to the management software (so it can
tell are cssids unrestricted or restricted).

The adverse effect of getting rid of the restriction on migration should
not be too severe.  Vfio-ccw devices are not live-migratable yet, and for
virtual devices using the extra freedom would only make sense with the
aforementioned guest support in place.

The auto-generated bus ids are affected by both changes. We hope to not
encounter any auto-generated bus ids in production as Libvirt is always
explicit about the bus id.  Since 8ed179c9 ("s390x/css: catch section
mismatch on load", 2017-05-18) the worst that can happen because the same
device ended up having a different bus id is a cleanly failed migration.
I find it hard to reason about the impact of changed auto-generated bus
ids on migration for command line users as I don't know which rules is
such an user supposed to follow.

Another pain-point is down- or upgrade of QEMU for command line users.
The old way and the new way of doing vfio-ccw are mutually incompatible.
Libvirt is only going to support the new way, so for libvirt users, the
possible problems at QEMU downgrade are the following. If a domain
contains virtual devices placed into a css different than 0xfe the domain
will refuse to start with a QEMU not having this patch. Putting devices
into a css different that 0xfe however won't make much sense in the near
future (guest support). Libvirt will refuse to do vfio-ccw with a QEMU
not having this patch. This is business as usual.
Signed-off-by: NHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NDong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20171206144438.28908-2-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      99577c49
    • C
      s390x: introduce 2.12 compat machine · 67ee0cef
      由 Cornelia Huck 提交于 
      Acked-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
      67ee0cef
  13. 30 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • C
      s390x/kvm: use cpu model for gscb on compat machines · 0280b3eb
      由 Christian Borntraeger 提交于 
      Starting a guest with
   <os>
    <type arch='s390x' machine='s390-ccw-virtio-2.9'>hvm</type>
  </os>
  <cpu mode='host-model'/>

on an IBM z14 results in

"qemu-system-s390x: Some features requested in the CPU model are not
available in the configuration: gs"

This is because guarded storage is fenced for compat machines that did
not have guarded storage support. While this prevents future migration
abort (by not starting the guest at all), not being able to start a
"host-model" guest is very much unexpected.  As it turns out, even if we
would modify libvirt to not expand the cpu model to contain "gs" for
compat machines, it cannot guarantee that a migration will succeed. For
example if the kernel changes its features (or the user has nested=1 on
one host but not on the other) the migration will fail nevertheless.  So
instead of fencing "gs" for machines <= 2.9 lets allow it for all
machine types that support the CPU model. This will make "host-model"
runnable all the time, while relying on the CPU model to reject invalid
migration attempts. We also need to change the migration for guarded
storage.
Additional discussions about host-model are still pending but are out
of scope of this patch.
Suggested-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NCornelia Huck &lt;Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      0280b3eb
  15. 20 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  17. 06 10月, 2017 6 次提交
  19. 20 9月, 2017 8 次提交
  21. 31 8月, 2017 6 次提交
  23. 21 7月, 2017 1 次提交