1. 14 6月, 2013 4 次提交
  2. 11 6月, 2013 3 次提交
  3. 03 6月, 2013 4 次提交
  4. 02 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 29 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 22 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 13 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 12 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 07 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 06 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 02 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      target-i386: Replace cpuid_*features fields with a feature word array · 0514ef2f
      Eduardo Habkost 提交于
      This replaces the feature-bit fields on both X86CPU and x86_def_t
      structs with an array.
      
      With this, we will be able to simplify code that simply does the same
      operation on all feature words (e.g. kvm_check_features_against_host(),
      filter_features_for_kvm(), add_flagname_to_bitmaps(), CPU feature-bit
      property lookup/registration, and the proposed "feature-words" property)
      
      The following field replacements were made on X86CPU and x86_def_t:
      
        (cpuid_)features         -> features[FEAT_1_EDX]
        (cpuid_)ext_features     -> features[FEAT_1_ECX]
        (cpuid_)ext2_features    -> features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX]
        (cpuid_)ext3_features    -> features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX]
        (cpuid_)ext4_features    -> features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX]
        (cpuid_)kvm_features     -> features[FEAT_KVM]
        (cpuid_)svm_features     -> features[FEAT_SVM]
        (cpuid_)7_0_ebx_features -> features[FEAT_7_0_EBX]
      Signed-off-by: NEduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NIgor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
      0514ef2f
  12. 01 5月, 2013 8 次提交
  13. 30 4月, 2013 4 次提交
  14. 29 4月, 2013 3 次提交
  15. 25 4月, 2013 4 次提交
    • M
      pc: Kill the "use flash device for BIOS unless KVM" misfeature · 9953f882
      Markus Armbruster 提交于
      Use of a flash memory device for the BIOS was added in series "[PATCH
      v10 0/8] PC system flash support", commit 4732dcaf..1b89fafe, v1.1.
      
      Flash vs. ROM is a guest-visible difference.  Thus, flash use had to
      be suppressed for machine types pc-1.0 and older.  This was
      accomplished by adding a dummy device "pc-sysfw" with property
      "rom_only":
      
      * Non-zero rom_only means "use ROM".  Default for pc-1.0 and older.
      * Zero rom_only means "maybe use flash".  Default for newer machines.
      
      Not only is the dummy device ugly, it was also retroactively added to
      the older machine types!  Fortunately, it's not guest-visible (thus no
      immediate guest ABI breakage), and has no vmstate (thus no immediate
      migration breakage).  Breakage occurs only if the user unwisely
      enables flash by setting rom_only to zero.  Patch review FAIL #1.
      
      Why "maybe use flash"?  Flash didn't (and still doesn't) work with
      KVM.  Therefore, rom_only=0 really means "use flash, except when KVM
      is enabled, use ROM".  This is a Bad Idea, because it makes enabling/
      disabling KVM guest-visible.  Patch review FAIL #2.
      
      Aside: it also precludes migrating between KVM on and off, but that's
      not possible for other reasons anyway.
      
      Fix as follows:
      
      1. Change the meaning of rom_only=0 to mean "use flash, no ifs, buts,
      or maybes" for pc-i440fx-1.5 and pc-q35-1.5.  Don't change anything
      for older machines (to remain bug-compatible).
      
      2. Change the default value from 0 to 1 for these machines.
      Necessary, because 0 doesn't work with KVM.  Once it does, we can flip
      the default back to 0.
      
      3. Don't revert the retroactive addition of device "pc-sysfw" to older
      machine types.  Seems not worth the trouble.
      
      4. Add a TODO comment asking for device "pc-sysfw" to be dropped once
      flash works with KVM.
      
      Net effect is that you get a BIOS ROM again even when KVM is disabled,
      just like for machines predating the introduction of flash.
      
      To get flash instead, use "--global pc-sysfw.rom_only=0".
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Message-id: 1365780303-26398-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
      Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
      9953f882
    • M
      pc: Split pc_init_pci_1_0() off pc_init_pci_1_2() · 6fd028f6
      Markus Armbruster 提交于
      Just to make the next commit easier to review.
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Message-id: 1365780303-26398-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
      Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
      6fd028f6
    • M
      pc: Inline pc_init_pci_1_3() into pc_init_pci_1_2() · 36afbc51
      Markus Armbruster 提交于
      Just to make the commit after next easier to review.
      Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      Message-id: 1365780303-26398-2-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
      Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
      36afbc51
    • H
      ich9: kill cmos_s3 · a3ac6b53
      Hu Tao 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NHu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      Message-id: 1366799842-18550-1-git-send-email-hutao@cn.fujitsu.com
      Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
      a3ac6b53
  16. 16 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 15 4月, 2013 1 次提交