Skip to content

Q
qemu

openeuler / qemu

通知 10
Star 0
Fork 0
Q
qemu

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 03 11月, 2015 20 次提交
  3. 02 11月, 2015 20 次提交
    • P
      Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qapi-2015-11-02' into staging · 3d861a01
      由 Peter Maydell 提交于 
      QAPI patches

# gpg: Signature made Mon 02 Nov 2015 09:07:23 GMT using RSA key ID EB918653
# gpg: Good signature from "Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>"
# gpg:                 aka "Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>"

* remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qapi-2015-11-02: (25 commits)
  qapi: Simplify gen_struct_field()
  qapi: Reserve 'u' member name
  qapi: Finish converting to new qapi union layout
  tpm: Convert to new qapi union layout
  memory: Convert to new qapi union layout
  input: Convert to new qapi union layout
  char: Convert to new qapi union layout
  net: Convert to new qapi union layout
  sockets: Convert to new qapi union layout
  block: Convert to new qapi union layout
  tests: Convert to new qapi union layout
  qapi-visit: Convert to new qapi union layout
  qapi: Start converting to new qapi union layout
  qapi-visit: Remove redundant functions for flat union base
  qapi: Unbox base members
  qapi: Prefer typesafe upcasts to qapi base classes
  qapi-types: Refactor base fields output
  qapi-visit: Split off visit_type_FOO_fields forward decl
  vnc: Hoist allocation of VncBasicInfo to callers
  qapi: Reserve 'q_*' and 'has_*' member names
  ...
Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      3d861a01
    • E
      qapi: Simplify gen_struct_field() · 32bc6879
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      Rather than having all callers pass a name, type, and optional
flag, have them instead pass a QAPISchemaObjectTypeMember which
already has all that information.

No change to generated code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-25-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      32bc6879
    • E
      qapi: Reserve 'u' member name · 5e59baf9
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      Now that we have separated union tag values from colliding with
non-variant C names, by naming the union 'u', we should reserve
this name for our use.  Note that we want to forbid 'u' even in
a struct with no variants, because it is possible for a future
qemu release to extend QMP in a backwards-compatible manner while
converting from a struct to a flat union.  Fortunately, no
existing clients were using this member name.  If we ever find
the need for QMP to have a member 'u', we could at that time
relax things, perhaps by having c_name() munge the QMP member to
'q_u'.

Note that we cannot forbid 'u' everywhere (by adding the
rejection code to check_name()), because the existing QKeyCode
enum already uses it; therefore we only reserve it as a struct
type member name.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      5e59baf9
    • E
      qapi: Finish converting to new qapi union layout · e4ba22b3
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

This patch is the back end for a series that converts to a
saner qapi union layout.  Now that all clients have been
converted to use 'type' and 'obj->u.value', we can drop the
temporary parallel support for 'kind' and 'obj->value'.

Given a simple union qapi type:

{ 'union':'Foo', 'data': { 'a':'int', 'b':'bool' } }

this is the overall effect, when compared to the state before
this series of patches:

| struct Foo {
|-    FooKind kind;
|-    union { /* union tag is @kind */
|+    FooKind type;
|+    union { /* union tag is @type */
|         void *data;
|         int64_t a;
|         bool b;
|-    };
|+    } u;
| };

The testsuite still contains some examples of artificial restrictions
(see flat-union-clash-type.json, for example) that are no longer
technically necessary, now that there is no longer a collision between
enum tag values and non-variant member names; but fixing this will be
done in later patches, in part because some further changes are required
to keep QAPISchema*.check() from asserting.  Also, a later patch will
add a reservation for the member name 'u' to avoid a collision between a
user's non-variant names and our internal choice of C union name.

Note, however, that we do not rename the generated enum, which
is still 'FooKind'.  A further patch could generate implicit
enums as 'FooType', but while the generator already reserved
the '*Kind' namespace (commit 4dc2e690), there are already QMP
constructs with '*Type' naming, which means changing our
reservation namespace would have lots of churn to C code to
deal with a forced name change.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-23-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      e4ba22b3
    • E
      tpm: Convert to new qapi union layout · ce21131a
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for TPM-related code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-22-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      ce21131a
    • E
      memory: Convert to new qapi union layout · 1fd5d4fe
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for memory-related code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-21-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      1fd5d4fe
    • E
      input: Convert to new qapi union layout · 568c73a4
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      568c73a4
    • E
      char: Convert to new qapi union layout · 130257dc
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for character-related
code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-19-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      130257dc
    • E
      net: Convert to new qapi union layout · 8d0bcba8
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for net-related code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      8d0bcba8
    • E
      sockets: Convert to new qapi union layout · 2d32adda
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for socket-related code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-17-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      2d32adda
    • E
      block: Convert to new qapi union layout · 6a8f9661
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for block-related code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-16-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      6a8f9661
    • E
      tests: Convert to new qapi union layout · c363acef
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for testsuite code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-15-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      c363acef
    • E
      qapi-visit: Convert to new qapi union layout · 150d0564
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

Make the conversion to the new layout for qapi-visit.py.

Generated code changes look like:

|@@ -4912,16 +4912,16 @@ void visit_type_MemoryDeviceInfo(Visitor
|     if (!*obj) {
|         goto out_obj;
|     }
|-    visit_type_MemoryDeviceInfoKind(v, &(*obj)->kind, "type", &err);
|+    visit_type_MemoryDeviceInfoKind(v, &(*obj)->type, "type", &err);
|     if (err) {
|         goto out_obj;
|     }
|-    if (!visit_start_union(v, !!(*obj)->data, &err) || err) {
|+    if (!visit_start_union(v, !!(*obj)->u.data, &err) || err) {
|         goto out_obj;
|     }
|-    switch ((*obj)->kind) {
|+    switch ((*obj)->type) {
|     case MEMORY_DEVICE_INFO_KIND_DIMM:
|-        visit_type_PCDIMMDeviceInfo(v, &(*obj)->dimm, "data", &err);
|+        visit_type_PCDIMMDeviceInfo(v, &(*obj)->u.dimm, "data", &err);
|         break;
|     default:
|         abort();
|@@ -4930,7 +4930,7 @@ out_obj:
|     error_propagate(errp, err);
|     err = NULL;
|     if (*obj) {
|-        visit_end_union(v, !!(*obj)->data, &err);
|+        visit_end_union(v, !!(*obj)->u.data, &err);
|     }
|     error_propagate(errp, err);
|     err = NULL;
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      150d0564
    • E
      qapi: Start converting to new qapi union layout · f51d8fab
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant
member's name.

This patch is the front end for a series that converts to a
saner qapi union layout.  By the end of the series, we will no
longer have the type/kind mismatch, and all tag values will be
under a named union, which requires clients to access
'obj->u.value' instead of 'obj->value'.  But since the
conversion touches a number of files, it is easiest if we
temporarily support BOTH layouts simultaneously.

Given a simple union qapi type:

{ 'union':'Foo', 'data': { 'a':'int', 'b':'bool' } }

make the following changes in generated qapi-types.h:

| struct Foo {
|-    FooKind kind;
|-    union { /* union tag is @kind */
|+    union {
|+        FooKind kind;
|+        FooKind type;
|+    };
|+    union { /* union tag is @type */
|         void *data;
|         int64_t a;
|         bool b;
|+        union { /* union tag is @type */
|+            void *data;
|+            int64_t a;
|+            bool b;
|+        } u;
|     };
| };

Flat unions do not need the anonymous union for the tag member,
as we already fixed that to use the member name instead of 'kind'
back in commit 0f61af3e.

One additional change is needed in qapi.py: check_union() now
needs to check for collisions with 'type' in addition to those
with 'kind'.

Later, when the conversions are complete, we will remove the
duplication hacks, and also drop the check_union() restrictions.

Note, however, that we do not rename the generated enum, which
is still 'FooKind'.  A further patch could generate implicit
enums as 'FooType', but while the generator already reserved
the '*Kind' namespace (commit 4dc2e690), there are already QMP
constructs with '*Type' naming, which means changing our
reservation namespace would have lots of churn to C code to
deal with a forced name change.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-13-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      f51d8fab
    • E
      qapi-visit: Remove redundant functions for flat union base · 5c5e51a0
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      The code for visiting the base class of a child struct created
visit_type_Base_fields() which covers all fields of Base; while
the code for visiting the base class of a flat union created
visit_type_Union_fields() covering all fields of the base
except the discriminator.  But since the base class includes
the discriminator of a flat union, we can just visit the entire
base, without needing a separate visit of the discriminator.
Not only is consistently visiting all fields easier to
understand, it lets us share code.

The generated code in qapi-visit.c loses several now-unused
visit_type_UNION_fields(), along with changes like:

|@@ -1654,11 +1557,7 @@ void visit_type_BlockdevOptions(Visitor
|     if (!*obj) {
|         goto out_obj;
|     }
|-    visit_type_BlockdevOptions_fields(v, obj, &err);
|-    if (err) {
|-        goto out_obj;
|-    }
|-    visit_type_BlockdevDriver(v, &(*obj)->driver, "driver", &err);
|+    visit_type_BlockdevOptionsBase_fields(v, (BlockdevOptionsBase **)obj, &err);
|     if (err) {
|         goto out_obj;
|     }

and forward declarations where needed.  Note that the cast of obj
to BASE ** is necessary to call visit_type_BASE_fields() (and we
can't use our upcast wrappers, because those work on pointers while
we have a pointer-to-pointer).
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-12-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      5c5e51a0
    • E
      qapi: Unbox base members · ddf21908
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      Rather than storing a base class as a pointer to a box, just
store the fields of that base class in the same order, so that
a child struct can be directly cast to its parent.  This gives
less malloc overhead, less pointer dereferencing, and even less
generated code.  Compare to the earlier commit 1e6c1616 "qapi:
Generate a nicer struct for flat unions" (although that patch
had fewer places to change, as less of qemu was directly using
qapi structs for flat unions).  It also allows us to turn on
automatic type-safe wrappers for upcasting to the base class
of a struct.

Changes to the generated code look like this in qapi-types.h:

| struct SpiceChannel {
|-    SpiceBasicInfo *base;
|+    /* Members inherited from SpiceBasicInfo: */
|+    char *host;
|+    char *port;
|+    NetworkAddressFamily family;
|+    /* Own members: */
|     int64_t connection_id;

as well as additional upcast functions like qapi_SpiceChannel_base().
Meanwhile, changes to qapi-visit.c look like:

| static void visit_type_SpiceChannel_fields(Visitor *v, SpiceChannel **obj, Error **errp)
| {
|     Error *err = NULL;
|
|-    visit_type_implicit_SpiceBasicInfo(v, &(*obj)->base, &err);
|+    visit_type_SpiceBasicInfo_fields(v, (SpiceBasicInfo **)obj, &err);
|     if (err) {

(the cast is necessary, since our upcast wrappers only deal with a
single pointer, not pointer-to-pointer); plus the wholesale
elimination of some now-unused visit_type_implicit_FOO() functions.

Without boxing, the corner case of one empty struct having
another empty struct as its base type now requires inserting a
dummy member (previously, the 'Base *base' member sufficed).

And now that we no longer consume a 'base' member in the generated
C struct, we can delete the former negative struct-base-clash-base
test.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-11-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked slightly]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      ddf21908
    • E
      qapi: Prefer typesafe upcasts to qapi base classes · 30594fe1
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      A previous patch (commit 1e6c1616) made it possible to
directly cast from a qapi flat union type to its base type.
However, it requires the use of a C cast, which turns off
compiler type-safety checks.  Fortunately, no such casts
exist, just yet.

Regardless, add inline type-safe wrappers named
qapi_FOO_base() for any union type FOO that has a base,
which can be used for a safer upcast, and enhance the
testsuite to cover the new functionality.

A future patch will extend the upcast support to structs,
where such conversions do exist already.

Note that C makes const-correct upcasts annoying because
it lacks overloads; these functions cast away const so that
they can accept user pointers whether const or not, and the
result in turn can be assigned to normal or const pointers.
Alternatively, this could have been done with macros, but
type-safe macros are hairy, and not worthwhile here.

This patch just adds upcasts.  None of our code needed to
downcast from a base qapi class to a child.  Also, in the
case of grandchildren (such as BlockdevOptionsQcow2), the
caller will need to call two functions to get to the inner
base (although it wouldn't be too hard to generate a
qapi_FOO_base_base() if desired).  If a user changes qapi
to alter the base class hierarchy, such as going from
'A -> C' to 'A -> B -> C', it will change the type of
'qapi_C_base()', and the compiler will point out the places
that are affected by the new base.

One alternative was proposed, but was deemed too ugly to use
in practice: the generators could output redundant
information using anonymous types:
| struct Child {
|     union {
|         struct {
|             Type1 parent_member1;
|             Type2 parent_member2;
|         };
|         Parent base;
|     };
| };
With that ugly proposal, for a given qapi type, obj->member
and obj->base.member would refer to the same storage; allowing
convenience in working with members without needing 'base.'
allowing typesafe upcast without needing a C cast by accessing
'&obj->base', and allowing downcasts from the parent back to
the child possible through container_of(obj, Child, base).
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      30594fe1
    • E
      qapi-types: Refactor base fields output · f87ab7f9
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      Move code from gen_union() into gen_struct_fields() in order for
a later patch to share code when enumerating inherited fields
for struct types.

No change to generated code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-9-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      f87ab7f9
    • E
      qapi-visit: Split off visit_type_FOO_fields forward decl · d02cf377
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      We generate a static visit_type_FOO_fields() for every type
FOO.  However, sometimes we need a forward declaration. Split
the code to generate the forward declaration out of
gen_visit_implicit_struct() into a new gen_visit_fields_decl(),
and also prepare for a forward declaration to be emitted
during gen_visit_struct(), so that a future patch can switch
from using visit_type_FOO_implicit() to the simpler
visit_type_FOO_fields() as part of unboxing the base class
of a struct.

No change to generated code.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-8-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      d02cf377
    • E
      vnc: Hoist allocation of VncBasicInfo to callers · 98481bfc
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      A future qapi patch will rework generated structs with a base
class to be unboxed.  In preparation for that, change the code
that allocates then populates an info struct to instead merely
populate the fields of an info field passed in as a parameter
(renaming vnc_basic_info_get* to vnc_init_basic_info*). Add
rudimentary Error handling at the lowest levels for cases
where the old code returned NULL; but rather than plumb Error
all the way through the stack, the callers drop the error and
return NULL as before.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-7-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      98481bfc