Skip to content

Q
qemu

openeuler / qemu

通知 10
Star 0
Fork 0
Q
qemu
切换分支/标签
  1. 04 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 06 5月, 2015 5 次提交
    • E
      qapi: Drop tests for inline nested structs · 6446a592
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      A future patch will be using a 'name':{dictionary} entry in the
QAPI schema to specify a default value for an optional argument;
but existing use of inline nested structs conflicts with that goal.

More precisely, a definition in the QAPI schema associates a name
with a set of properties:

Example 1: { 'struct': 'Foo', 'data': { MEMBERS... } }
associates the global name 'Foo' with properties (meta-type struct)
and MEMBERS...

Example 2: 'mumble': TYPE
within MEMBERS... above associates 'mumble' with properties (type
TYPE) and (optional false) within type Foo

The syntax of example 1 is extensible; if we need another property,
we add another name/value pair to the dictionary (such as
'base':TYPE).  The syntax of example 2 is not extensible, because
the right hand side can only be a type.

We have used name encoding to add a property: "'*mumble': 'int'"
associates 'mumble' with (type int) and (optional true).  Nice,
but doesn't scale.  So the solution is to change our existing uses
to be syntactic sugar to an extensible form:

   NAME: TYPE   --> NAME:  { 'type': TYPE, 'optional': false }
   *ONAME: TYPE --> ONAME: { 'type': TYPE, 'optional': true }

This patch fixes the testsuite to avoid inline nested types, by
breaking the nesting into explicit types; it means that the type
is now boxed instead of unboxed in C code, but makes no difference
on the wire (and if desired, a later patch could change the
generator to not do so much boxing in C).  When touching code to
add new allocations, also convert existing allocations to
consistently prefer typesafe g_new0 over g_malloc0 when a type
name is involved.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      6446a592
    • E
      qapi: Merge UserDefTwo and UserDefNested in tests · b6fcf32d
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      In the testsuite, UserDefTwo and UserDefNested were identical
structs other than the member names.  Reduce code duplication by
having just one type, and choose names that also favor reuse.
This will also make it easier for a later patch to get rid of
inline nested types in QAPI.  When touching code related to
allocations, convert g_malloc0(sizeof(Type)) to the more typesafe
g_new0(Type, 1).

Ensure that 'make check-qapi-schema check-unit' still passes.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      b6fcf32d
    • E
      qapi: Rename anonymous union type in test · ab045267
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      Reduce churn in the future patch that replaces anonymous unions
with a new metatype 'alternate' by changing 'AnonUnion' to
'Alternate'.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      ab045267
    • E
      qapi: Forbid base without discriminator in unions · a8d4a2e4
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      None of the existing QMP or QGA interfaces uses a union with a
base type but no discriminator; it is easier to avoid this in the
generator to save room for other future extensions more likely to
be useful.  An earlier commit added a union-base-no-discriminator
test to ensure that we eventually give a decent error message;
likewise, removing UserDefUnion outright is okay, because we moved
all the tests we wish to keep into the tests of the simple union
UserDefNativeListUnion in the previous commit.  Now is the time to
actually forbid simple union with base, and remove the last
vestiges from the testsuite.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      a8d4a2e4
    • E
      qapi: Clean up test coverage of simple unions · 805017b7
      由 Eric Blake 提交于 
      The tests of UserDefNativeListUnion serve to validate code
generation of simple unions without a base type, except that it
did not have full coverage in the strict test.  The next commits
will remove tests and support for simple unions with a base type,
so there is no real loss at repurposing that test here as
opposed to churn of adding a new test then deleting the old one.

Fix some indentation and long lines while at it.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
      805017b7
  5. 16 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      qapi: Replace uncommon use of the error API by the common one · 297a3646
      由 Markus Armbruster 提交于 
      We commonly use the error API like this:

    err = NULL;
    foo(..., &err);
    if (err) {
        goto out;
    }
    bar(..., &err);

Every error source is checked separately.  The second function is only
called when the first one succeeds.  Both functions are free to pass
their argument to error_set().  Because error_set() asserts no error
has been set, this effectively means they must not be called with an
error set.

The qapi-generated code uses the error API differently:

    // *errp was initialized to NULL somewhere up the call chain
    frob(..., errp);
    gnat(..., errp);

Errors accumulate in *errp: first error wins, subsequent errors get
dropped.  To make this work, the second function does nothing when
called with an error set.  Requires non-null errp, or else the second
function can't see the first one fail.

This usage has also bled into visitor tests, and two device model
object property getters rtc_get_date() and balloon_stats_get_all().

With the "accumulate" technique, you need fewer error checks in
callers, and buy that with an error check in every callee.  Can be
nice.

However, mixing the two techniques is confusing.  You can't use the
"accumulate" technique with functions designed for the "check
separately" technique.  You can use the "check separately" technique
with functions designed for the "accumulate" technique, but then
error_set() can't catch you setting an error more than once.

Standardize on the "check separately" technique for now, because it's
overwhelmingly prevalent.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
      297a3646
  7. 09 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 11 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 04 3月, 2014 4 次提交
  13. 18 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 27 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 23 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  21. 19 12月, 2012 2 次提交
  23. 23 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      qapi: fix error propagation · d195325b
      由 Paolo Bonzini 提交于 
      Don't overwrite / leak previously set errors.
Make traversal cope with missing mandatory sub-structs.
Don't try to end a container that could not be started.

v1->v2:
- unchanged

v2->v3:
- instead of examining, assert that we never overwrite errors with
  error_set()
- allow visitors to set a NULL struct pointer successfully, so traversal
  of incomplete objects can continue
- check for a NULL "obj" before accessing "(*obj)->has_XXX" (this is not a
  typo, "obj != NULL" implies "*obj != NULL" here)
- fix start_struct / end_struct balance for unions as well
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLaszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      d195325b
  25. 30 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 27 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 12 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  31. 18 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  33. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交