提交 c5b09f3f 编写于 作者: J John Snow 提交者: Kevin Wolf

jobs: fix stale wording

During the design for manual completion, we decided not to use the
"manual" property as a shorthand for both auto-dismiss and auto-finalize.

Fix the wording.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
上级 c6a9d2f6
......@@ -50,16 +50,17 @@
# the last job in a transaction.
#
# @pending: The job has finished its work, but has finalization steps that it
# needs to make prior to completing. These changes may require
# manual intervention by the management process if manual was set
# to true. These changes may still fail.
# needs to make prior to completing. These changes will require
# manual intervention via @job-finalize if auto-finalize was set to
# false. These pending changes may still fail.
#
# @aborting: The job is in the process of being aborted, and will finish with
# an error. The job will afterwards report that it is @concluded.
# This status may not be visible to the management process.
#
# @concluded: The job has finished all work. If manual was set to true, the job
# will remain in the query list until it is dismissed.
# @concluded: The job has finished all work. If auto-dismiss was set to false,
# the job will remain in the query list until it is dismissed via
# @job-dismiss.
#
# @null: The job is in the process of being dismantled. This state should not
# ever be visible externally.
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册