提交 c0c080c5 编写于 作者: A Andreas Färber 提交者: Michael Roth

gdbstub: Fix gdb_register_coprocessor() register counting

Commit a0e372f0 reorganized the register
counting for GDB. While it seems correct not to let the total number of
registers skyrocket in an SMP scenario through a static variable, the
distinction between total register count and 'g' packet register count
(last_reg vs. num_g_regs) got lost among the way.

Fix this by introducing CPUState::gdb_num_g_regs and using that in
gdb_handle_packet().
Reported-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org (stable-1.6)
Tested-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NMax Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
(cherry picked from commit 35143f01)
Signed-off-by: NMichael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
上级 670599a0
...@@ -621,6 +621,8 @@ void gdb_register_coprocessor(CPUState *cpu, ...@@ -621,6 +621,8 @@ void gdb_register_coprocessor(CPUState *cpu,
if (g_pos != s->base_reg) { if (g_pos != s->base_reg) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error: Bad gdb register numbering for '%s'\n" fprintf(stderr, "Error: Bad gdb register numbering for '%s'\n"
"Expected %d got %d\n", xml, g_pos, s->base_reg); "Expected %d got %d\n", xml, g_pos, s->base_reg);
} else {
cpu->gdb_num_g_regs = cpu->gdb_num_regs;
} }
} }
} }
...@@ -902,7 +904,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char *line_buf) ...@@ -902,7 +904,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char *line_buf)
case 'g': case 'g':
cpu_synchronize_state(s->g_cpu); cpu_synchronize_state(s->g_cpu);
len = 0; len = 0;
for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_regs; addr++) { for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_g_regs; addr++) {
reg_size = gdb_read_register(s->g_cpu, mem_buf + len, addr); reg_size = gdb_read_register(s->g_cpu, mem_buf + len, addr);
len += reg_size; len += reg_size;
} }
...@@ -914,7 +916,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char *line_buf) ...@@ -914,7 +916,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char *line_buf)
registers = mem_buf; registers = mem_buf;
len = strlen(p) / 2; len = strlen(p) / 2;
hextomem((uint8_t *)registers, p, len); hextomem((uint8_t *)registers, p, len);
for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_regs && len > 0; addr++) { for (addr = 0; addr < s->g_cpu->gdb_num_g_regs && len > 0; addr++) {
reg_size = gdb_write_register(s->g_cpu, registers, addr); reg_size = gdb_write_register(s->g_cpu, registers, addr);
len -= reg_size; len -= reg_size;
registers += reg_size; registers += reg_size;
......
...@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct kvm_run; ...@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct kvm_run;
* @current_tb: Currently executing TB. * @current_tb: Currently executing TB.
* @gdb_regs: Additional GDB registers. * @gdb_regs: Additional GDB registers.
* @gdb_num_regs: Number of total registers accessible to GDB. * @gdb_num_regs: Number of total registers accessible to GDB.
* @gdb_num_g_regs: Number of registers in GDB 'g' packets.
* @next_cpu: Next CPU sharing TB cache. * @next_cpu: Next CPU sharing TB cache.
* @kvm_fd: vCPU file descriptor for KVM. * @kvm_fd: vCPU file descriptor for KVM.
* *
...@@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ struct CPUState { ...@@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ struct CPUState {
struct TranslationBlock *current_tb; struct TranslationBlock *current_tb;
struct GDBRegisterState *gdb_regs; struct GDBRegisterState *gdb_regs;
int gdb_num_regs; int gdb_num_regs;
int gdb_num_g_regs;
CPUState *next_cpu; CPUState *next_cpu;
int kvm_fd; int kvm_fd;
......
...@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void cpu_common_initfn(Object *obj) ...@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void cpu_common_initfn(Object *obj)
CPUState *cpu = CPU(obj); CPUState *cpu = CPU(obj);
CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(obj); CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
cpu->gdb_num_regs = cc->gdb_num_core_regs; cpu->gdb_num_regs = cpu->gdb_num_g_regs = cc->gdb_num_core_regs;
} }
static int64_t cpu_common_get_arch_id(CPUState *cpu) static int64_t cpu_common_get_arch_id(CPUState *cpu)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册