提交 b061dc41 编写于 作者: P Paolo Bonzini 提交者: Andreas Färber

qom: Do not register interface "types" in the type table and fix names

There should be no need to look up nor enumerate the interface "types",
whose "classes" are really just vtables.  Just create the types and
add them to the interface list of the parent type.

Interfaces not registering their type anymore means that accessing
superclass::interface by type name will fail when initializing
subclass::interface.  Thus, we need to pre-initialize the subclass's
parent_type field before calling type_initialize.  Apart from this, the
interface "types" should never be used and thus it is harmless to leave
them out of the hashtable.

Further, the interface types had a bug with interfaces that are
inherited from a superclass:  The implementation type name was wrong
(for example it was subclass::superclass::interface rather than
just subclass::interface).  This patch fixes this as well.
Reported-by: NIgor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NIgor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
上级 0ab4c94c
......@@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ struct InterfaceClass
ObjectClass parent_class;
/*< private >*/
ObjectClass *concrete_class;
Type interface_type;
};
#define TYPE_INTERFACE "interface"
......
......@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static TypeImpl *type_table_lookup(const char *name)
return g_hash_table_lookup(type_table_get(), name);
}
static TypeImpl *type_register_internal(const TypeInfo *info)
static TypeImpl *type_new(const TypeInfo *info)
{
TypeImpl *ti = g_malloc0(sizeof(*ti));
int i;
......@@ -122,8 +122,15 @@ static TypeImpl *type_register_internal(const TypeInfo *info)
}
ti->num_interfaces = i;
type_table_add(ti);
return ti;
}
static TypeImpl *type_register_internal(const TypeInfo *info)
{
TypeImpl *ti;
ti = type_new(info);
type_table_add(ti);
return ti;
}
......@@ -206,22 +213,25 @@ static bool type_is_ancestor(TypeImpl *type, TypeImpl *target_type)
static void type_initialize(TypeImpl *ti);
static void type_initialize_interface(TypeImpl *ti, const char *parent)
static void type_initialize_interface(TypeImpl *ti, TypeImpl *interface_type,
TypeImpl *parent_type)
{
InterfaceClass *new_iface;
TypeInfo info = { };
TypeImpl *iface_impl;
info.parent = parent;
info.name = g_strdup_printf("%s::%s", ti->name, info.parent);
info.parent = parent_type->name;
info.name = g_strdup_printf("%s::%s", ti->name, interface_type->name);
info.abstract = true;
iface_impl = type_register(&info);
iface_impl = type_new(&info);
iface_impl->parent_type = parent_type;
type_initialize(iface_impl);
g_free((char *)info.name);
new_iface = (InterfaceClass *)iface_impl->class;
new_iface->concrete_class = ti->class;
new_iface->interface_type = interface_type;
ti->class->interfaces = g_slist_append(ti->class->interfaces,
iface_impl->class);
......@@ -251,8 +261,10 @@ static void type_initialize(TypeImpl *ti)
ti->class->interfaces = NULL;
for (e = parent->class->interfaces; e; e = e->next) {
ObjectClass *iface = e->data;
type_initialize_interface(ti, object_class_get_name(iface));
InterfaceClass *iface = e->data;
ObjectClass *klass = OBJECT_CLASS(iface);
type_initialize_interface(ti, iface->interface_type, klass->type);
}
for (i = 0; i < ti->num_interfaces; i++) {
......@@ -269,7 +281,7 @@ static void type_initialize(TypeImpl *ti)
continue;
}
type_initialize_interface(ti, ti->interfaces[i].typename);
type_initialize_interface(ti, t, t);
}
}
......@@ -285,8 +297,6 @@ static void type_initialize(TypeImpl *ti)
if (ti->class_init) {
ti->class_init(ti->class, ti->class_data);
}
}
static void object_init_with_type(Object *obj, TypeImpl *ti)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册