提交 61f0ed1d 编写于 作者: F Fam Zheng 提交者: Kevin Wolf

vmdk: Fix index_in_cluster calculation in vmdk_co_get_block_status

It has the similar issue with b1649fae. Since the calculation
is repeated for a few times already, introduce a function so it can be
reused.
Signed-off-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
上级 bc85ef26
......@@ -1248,6 +1248,17 @@ static VmdkExtent *find_extent(BDRVVmdkState *s,
return NULL;
}
static inline uint64_t vmdk_find_index_in_cluster(VmdkExtent *extent,
int64_t sector_num)
{
uint64_t index_in_cluster, extent_begin_sector, extent_relative_sector_num;
extent_begin_sector = extent->end_sector - extent->sectors;
extent_relative_sector_num = sector_num - extent_begin_sector;
index_in_cluster = extent_relative_sector_num % extent->cluster_sectors;
return index_in_cluster;
}
static int64_t coroutine_fn vmdk_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
{
......@@ -1285,7 +1296,7 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn vmdk_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
break;
}
index_in_cluster = sector_num % extent->cluster_sectors;
index_in_cluster = vmdk_find_index_in_cluster(extent, sector_num);
n = extent->cluster_sectors - index_in_cluster;
if (n > nb_sectors) {
n = nb_sectors;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册