提交 5fda043f 编写于 作者: I Igor Mitsyanko 提交者: Blue Swirl

exec.c: fix dirty bitmap reallocation

For each newly created RAM block, dirty bitmap is reallocated with g_realloc, which doesn't
make any promises on initial content of new extra data in returned buffer. In theory,
we initialize this new data with cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range() call. The
problem is, cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range() has a side effect of incrementing
ram_list.dirty_pages variable, but only for pages which are not already dirty. And
page "cleanliness" is determined using the same not yet uninitialized dirty bitmap
we've just reallocated. This results in inconsistency between real dirty page number
and value in ram_list.dirty_pages variable, which in turn could (and will) result
in errors during VM migration.
Zero initialize new dirty bitmap bytes to fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: NIgor Mitsyanko <i.mitsyanko@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
上级 0521d375
......@@ -2550,6 +2550,8 @@ ram_addr_t qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr(ram_addr_t size, void *host,
ram_list.phys_dirty = g_realloc(ram_list.phys_dirty,
last_ram_offset() >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
memset(ram_list.phys_dirty + (new_block->offset >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
0, size >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(new_block->offset, size, 0xff);
if (kvm_enabled())
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册