提交 5ca9d21b 编写于 作者: K Kevin Wolf

block-backend: Fix potential double blk_delete()

blk_unref() first decreases the refcount of the BlockBackend and calls
blk_delete() if the refcount reaches zero. Requests can still be in
flight at this point, they are only drained during blk_delete():

At this point, arbitrary callbacks can run. If any callback takes a
temporary BlockBackend reference, it will first increase the refcount to
1 and then decrease it to 0 again, triggering another blk_delete(). This
will cause a use-after-free crash in the outer blk_delete().

Fix it by draining the BlockBackend before decreasing to refcount to 0.
Assert in blk_ref() that it never takes the first refcount (which would
mean that the BlockBackend is already being deleted).
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NFam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
上级 fe5258a5
......@@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ int blk_get_refcnt(BlockBackend *blk)
*/
void blk_ref(BlockBackend *blk)
{
assert(blk->refcnt > 0);
blk->refcnt++;
}
......@@ -447,7 +448,13 @@ void blk_unref(BlockBackend *blk)
{
if (blk) {
assert(blk->refcnt > 0);
if (!--blk->refcnt) {
if (blk->refcnt > 1) {
blk->refcnt--;
} else {
blk_drain(blk);
/* blk_drain() cannot resurrect blk, nobody held a reference */
assert(blk->refcnt == 1);
blk->refcnt = 0;
blk_delete(blk);
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册