提交 1d50c8e9 编写于 作者: M Markus Armbruster 提交者: Blue Swirl

check-qjson: Test noncharacters other than U+FFFE, U+FFFF in strings

Test cases cover the two noncharacters in the BMP.  Add tests for the
other 64 noncharacters.

Three existing test cases involve noncharacters U+FFFF and U+10FFFF.
Instead of deleting them as now duplicates, adjust them to use U+FFFC
and U+10FFFFD.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NLaszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
上级 d6244e2c
......@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void utf8_string(void)
* consider using overlong encoding \xC0\x80 for U+0000 ("modified
* UTF-8").
*
* Test cases are scraped from Markus Kuhn's UTF-8 decoder
* Most test cases are scraped from Markus Kuhn's UTF-8 decoder
* capability and stress test at
* http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/UTF-8-test.txt
*/
......@@ -256,11 +256,19 @@ static void utf8_string(void)
"\xDF\xBF",
"\"\\u07FF\"",
},
/* 2.2.3 3 bytes U+FFFF */
/*
* 2.2.3 3 bytes U+FFFC
* The last possible sequence is actually U+FFFF. But that's
* a noncharacter, and already covered by its own test case
* under 5.3. Same for U+FFFE. U+FFFD is the last character
* in the BMP, and covered under 2.3. Because of U+FFFD's
* special role as replacement character, it's worth testing
* U+FFFC here.
*/
{
"\"\xEF\xBF\xBF\"",
"\xEF\xBF\xBF",
"\"\\uFFFF\"",
"\"\xEF\xBF\xBC\"",
"\xEF\xBF\xBC",
"\"\\uFFFC\"",
},
/* 2.2.4 4 bytes U+1FFFFF */
{
......@@ -303,10 +311,10 @@ static void utf8_string(void)
"\"\\uFFFD\"",
},
{
/* last one in last plane: U+10FFFF */
"\"\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBF\"",
"\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBF",
"\"\\u43FF\\uFFFF\"", /* bug: want "\"\\uDBFF\\uDFFF\"" */
/* last one in last plane: U+10FFFD */
"\"\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBD\"",
"\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBD",
"\"\\u43FF\\uFFFF\"", /* bug: want "\"\\uDBFF\\uDFFD\"" */
},
{
/* first one beyond Unicode range: U+110000 */
......@@ -589,9 +597,14 @@ static void utf8_string(void)
"\"\\u07FF\"",
},
{
/* \U+FFFF */
"\"\xF0\x8F\xBF\xBF\"",
"\xF0\x8F\xBF\xBF", /* bug: not corrected */
/*
* \U+FFFC
* The actual maximum would be U+FFFF, but that's a
* noncharacter. Testing U+FFFC seems more useful. See
* also 2.2.3
*/
"\"\xF0\x8F\xBF\xBC\"",
"\xF0\x8F\xBF\xBC", /* bug: not corrected */
"\"\\u03FF\\uFFFF\"", /* bug: want "\"\\uFFFF\"" */
},
{
......@@ -736,6 +749,7 @@ static void utf8_string(void)
"\"\\uDBFF\\uDFFF\"", /* bug: want "\"\\uFFFF\\uFFFF\"" */
},
/* 5.3 Other illegal code positions */
/* BMP noncharacters */
{
/* \U+FFFE */
"\"\xEF\xBF\xBE\"",
......@@ -748,6 +762,64 @@ static void utf8_string(void)
"\xEF\xBF\xBF", /* bug: not corrected */
"\"\\uFFFF\"", /* bug: not corrected */
},
{
/* U+FDD0 */
"\"\xEF\xB7\x90\"",
"\xEF\xB7\x90", /* bug: not corrected */
"\"\\uFDD0\"", /* bug: not corrected */
},
{
/* U+FDEF */
"\"\xEF\xB7\xAF\"",
"\xEF\xB7\xAF", /* bug: not corrected */
"\"\\uFDEF\"", /* bug: not corrected */
},
/* Plane 1 .. 16 noncharacters */
{
/* U+1FFFE U+1FFFF U+2FFFE U+2FFFF ... U+10FFFE U+10FFFF */
"\"\xF0\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF0\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF0\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF0\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF0\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF0\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF1\x8F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF1\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF1\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF1\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF2\x8F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF2\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF2\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF2\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF3\x8F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF3\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF3\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF3\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBF\"",
/* bug: not corrected */
"\xF0\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF0\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF0\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF0\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF0\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF0\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF1\x8F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF1\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF1\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF1\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF1\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF2\x8F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF2\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF2\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF2\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF2\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF3\x8F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\x9F\xBF\xBE\xF3\x9F\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\xAF\xBF\xBE\xF3\xAF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF3\xBF\xBF\xBE\xF3\xBF\xBF\xBF"
"\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBE\xF4\x8F\xBF\xBF",
/* bug: not corrected */
"\"\\u07FF\\uFFFF\\u07FF\\uFFFF\\u0BFF\\uFFFF\\u0BFF\\uFFFF"
"\\u0FFF\\uFFFF\\u0FFF\\uFFFF\\u13FF\\uFFFF\\u13FF\\uFFFF"
"\\u17FF\\uFFFF\\u17FF\\uFFFF\\u1BFF\\uFFFF\\u1BFF\\uFFFF"
"\\u1FFF\\uFFFF\\u1FFF\\uFFFF\\u23FF\\uFFFF\\u23FF\\uFFFF"
"\\u27FF\\uFFFF\\u27FF\\uFFFF\\u2BFF\\uFFFF\\u2BFF\\uFFFF"
"\\u2FFF\\uFFFF\\u2FFF\\uFFFF\\u33FF\\uFFFF\\u33FF\\uFFFF"
"\\u37FF\\uFFFF\\u37FF\\uFFFF\\u3BFF\\uFFFF\\u3BFF\\uFFFF"
"\\u3FFF\\uFFFF\\u3FFF\\uFFFF\\u43FF\\uFFFF\\u43FF\\uFFFF\"",
},
{}
};
int i;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册